Journals / Praksis / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30-31

New Institutionalism(s) as the Mainstream of Social and Labour Market Policy Studies: Employment Policy Transformations in Greece, Spain and Turkey in the 2000s

Sosyal politika ve emek piyasası politikaları incelemelerinde anaakım yaklaşım olarak yeni kurumsalcılık(lar): 2000'lerde Yunanistan, İspanya ve Türkiye'de istihdam politikalarında dönüşüm

Journal
Praksis
Pages
199–220
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of this paper such common tendencies are mainly focused on and the tensions immanent in the policies that are in line with the mainstream framework are pointed out.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There have been extensive transformations in the fields of social and labour market policies on a global scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In that respect the employment policy transformations in Turkey, Spain and Greece in the 2000s are critically examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of this paper such common tendencies are mainly focused on and the tensions immanent in the policies that are in line with the mainstream framework are pointed out.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There have been extensive transformations in the fields of social and labour market policies on a global scale. These transformation processes that have witnessed reform initiatives in changing forms and degrees have at the same time intensively become subject of social scientific knowledge production. This paper aims to lay bare the limits of new institutionalist perspectives that have gained a central place in the fields of social and labour market policies on the one hand and their points of convergence with the mainstream approaches and policies on the other hand. In that respect the employment policy transformations in Turkey, Spain and Greece in the 2000s are critically examined. These cases have witnessed intensive labour reform initiatives and implementations especially within the context of the 2007-2009 global economic crisis. These policy making processes that have been shaped around the main postulates of new institutionalism(s) imply differences as well as important commonalities. Within the scope of this paper such common tendencies are mainly focused on and the tensions immanent in the policies that are in line with the mainstream framework are pointed out.

Özet

Küresel ölçekte sosyal politika ve emek piyasası politikaları alanında önemli dönüşümlerin gerçekleştiği bir dönemden geçmekteyiz. Farklı biçim ve derecelerde reform girişimlerine sahne olan bu dönüşüm süreçleri, aynı zamanda yoğun biçimde sosyal bilimlerde bilgi üretiminin de konusu olmaktadır. Bu yazı sosyal politika ve emek piyasası politikaları bağlamında hakim bir yer edinmiş olan yeni kurumsalcı yaklaşımların, söz konusu politika alanlarındaki anaakım yaklaşım ve politikalarla örtüşme noktalarını ve sınırlarını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye, İspanya ve Yunanistanda 2000lerde gerçekleşen istihdam politika dönüşümleri eleştirel bir incelemeye tabi tutulmaktadır. Söz konusu ülke örnekleri, özellikle 2007-2009 küresel kriziyle birlikte yoğun emek reformu girişimlerine ve uygulamalarına sahne olmuştur. Yeni-kurumsalcılık(lar)ın temel önermeleri etrafında şekillenen bu politika yapma süreçleri, farklılıkların yanı sıra önemli ortaklıklara da işaret etmektedir. Bu yazı kapsamında ağırlıklı olarak söz konusu ortak eğilimlere odaklanılmakta ve anaakım çerçeveye uyan politikaların taşıdığı gerilimlere işaret edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, S. (2022). New Institutionalism(s) as the Mainstream of Social and Labour Market Policy Studies: Employment Policy Transformations in Greece, Spain and Turkey in the 2000s. Praksis, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30-31, 199–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/588570

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Arts, W. ve J. Gellssen (2002) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-Art Report", Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (2): 137-158.
  2. Aspinwall, M. D. ve G. Schneider (2000) "Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and The Study Of European Integration", European Journal of Political Research, 38:1 -36. Banyuls, J„ F. Miguelez, A. Recio, E. Cano ve R. Lorente (2009) The Transformation of the Employment System in Spain: Towards a Mediterranean Neoliberalism?", Bosch, G., S. Lehndorff ve J. Rubery (der.), Eu ropean Employment Models in Flux: A Comparison of Institutional Change in Nine European Countries içinde, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 247- 269. Barbieri, P. (2009) "Flexible Employment and Inequality in Europe", European Sociologica Review, 25 (6): 621-628.
  3. Becker, J. ve J. Jâger (2011) "From an Economic Crisis to a Crisis of European Integration", Neoliberalism and the Crisis of Economic Science Konferansı'na sunulmuş tebliğ, IIPPE, Istanbul, 20-22
  4. Mayıs. Blavoukos, S. ve G. Pagoulatos (2008) The Limits of EMU Conditionality: Fiscal Adjustment in Southern Europe", Journal of Public Policy, 28 (2): 229-253.
  5. Bonoli, G. (2009) "Adapting Employment Policies to Postindustrial Labour Market Risks", Guigni, M. (der.). The Politics of Unemployment in Europe: Policy Responses and Collective Action içinde, Surrey, Burlington: Ashgate, 35-51.
  6. Bozkurt, S. ve G. Yalman (2011) "Case Study: AKP Governments and the Social and Labour Market Policy Transformations in Turkey in the 2000s", httpy/www.emerginacQuntries.org/Ddf/labour%20market.so-cial%20policy.Turkey.pdf. indirilme tarihi: 15 Haziran 2012.
  7. Bradley, D. ve J. D. Stephens (2006) "Employment Performance in OECD Countries: A Test of Neo-Uberal and Institutionalist Hypotheses", 15. International Conference of Europeanists'a sunulmuş tebliğ, Chicago, 29 Mart-2 Nisan. Bruff, I, (2011) "What about the Elephant in the Room? Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties in Capitalism", New Political Economy, 16 (4): 481-500.
  8. Buğra, A. ve Ç. Keyder (2003) New Poverty and the Changing Welfare Regime of Turkey, http://www.undp. org.tr/DublicationsDocumpnts/new oovertv.odf. indirilme tarihi: 10 Aralık 2011.
  9. Buğra, A. ve Ç. Keyder (2006) "The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation", Journal of European Social Policy, 16 (3): 211-228. BSB [Bağımsız Sosyal Bilimciler] (2011) Ücretli Emek ve Sermaye: Derinleşen Küresel Kriz ve Türkiye'ye Yansımaları, İstanbul: Yordam. Cam