Journals / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Prenatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed with fetal single umbilical artery

Fetal tek umbilikal arter tanısı almış gebeliklerde prenatal ve neonatal sonuçlar

Pages
217–224
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Compared with the 100 DUA fetuses, SUA was a risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm deliv- ery, Apgar scores of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the associated anomalies and outcomes of fetuses diagnosed as having a single umbilical artery (SUA) which were reported inconsistently in previous studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The data of 82 pregnancies with fetal SUA, 35 of which were complex, and 47 isolated SUA (iSUA) and 100 pregnancies with fetal double umbilical arteries (DUA) between June 2018 and July 2020 were retrieved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Compared with the 100 DUA fetuses, SUA was a risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm deliv- ery, Apgar scores of
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the associated anomalies and outcomes of fetuses diagnosed as having a single umbilical artery (SUA) which were reported inconsistently in previous studies. Methods: The data of 82 pregnancies with fetal SUA, 35 of which were complex, and 47 isolated SUA (iSUA) and 100 pregnancies with fetal double umbilical arteries (DUA) between June 2018 and July 2020 were retrieved. We compared the maternal characteristics, and pregnancy and fetal outcomes of the three groups (iSUA, SUA, and DUA). Results: Of 82 fetuses with SUA, 35 had 64 major structural abnor- malities. 20 of these 35 fetuses (57.1%) had cardiovascular malforma- tions, 12 (34.2%) had central nervous, 10 (28.5%) had genitourinary, and eight (22.8%) had gastrointestinal system malformations. Isolated SUA was present in SUA. Compared with the 100 DUA fetuses, SUA was a risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm deliv- ery, Apgar scores of

Özet

Amaç: Çal›flman›n amac›, önceki çal›flmalarda çeliflkili flekilde bildi- rilmifl olan tek umbilikal arter ( single umbilical artery, SUA) tan›s› al- m›fl fetüslerin iliflkili anomalilerini ve sonuçlar›n› araflt›rmakt›r. Yöntem: Haziran 2018 ile Temmuz 2020 aras›nda, 35’i kompleks ve 47’si izole SUA (iSUA) olan fetal SUA’l› 82 gebenin ve fetal çift umbilikal arterli (double umbilical arteries, DUA) 100 gebenin verile- ri topland›. Üç grubun (iSUA, SUA ve DUA) maternal özellikleri ile gebelik ve fetal sonuçlar› karfl›laflt›r›ld›. Bulgular: SUA’l› 82 fetüsün 35’inde 64 majör yap›sal anomali, bu 35 fetüsün 20’sinde (%57.1) kardiyovasküler malformasyonlar, 12’sinde (%34.2) merkezi sinir sistemi malformasyonlar›, 10’unda (%28.5) ge- nitoüriner sistem malformasyonlar› ve 8’inde (%22.8) gastrointesti- nal sistem malformasyonlar› mevcuttu. ‹zole SUA, SUA olgular› için- de yer almaktayd›. DUA’l› 100 fetüs ile karfl›laflt›r›ld›¤›nda, SUA in- trauterin büyüme k›s›tl›l›¤› (IUGR), preterm do¤um, 7’den küçük Apgar skorlar› ve yenido¤an yo¤un bak›m ünitesine yat›fl için bir risk oluflturmakta idi. SUA olgular›nda fetal kromozomal veya yap›sal anomaliye sahip olmak; amniyotik s›v› anomalisi, gebeli¤in sonland›- r›lmas›, intrauterin fetal ölüm, erken neonatal ölüm ve düflük canl› do¤um oran› için risk faktörü idi. Sonuç: SUA, artan bir oranda fetal yap›sal ve kromozomal ano- maliye sahiptir. Bunlar aras›nda en çok tespit edilen kardiyak mal- formasyonlar ve ikinci en yayg›n olan ise merkezi sinir sistemi malformasyonlar›d›r. Fetal SUA’l› gebelikler; IUGR, preterm do- ¤um, düflük Apgar skorlar› ve yenido¤an yo¤un bak›m ünitesine yat›fl yönünden artm›fl riske sahiptir. Ek yap›sal veya kromozomal malformasyon varl›¤›, bu advers gebelik risklerinin oran›n› art›r- maktad›r. Bu nedenle bu olgular, özel fetal ultrasonografik organ taramas›na ve yak›n prenatal takibe gereksinim duymaktad›r.

🔖

Cite This Article

OBUT, M., ÇAĞLAR, A. T., YILDIZ, G. A., AKAY, A., ÇELİK, Ö. Y., İSKENDER, C. T., ÖNCÜ, A. K., ÖZCAN, G. (2022). Prenatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies diagnosed with fetal single umbilical artery. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 217–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/588330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, Van den Hof M. Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010
  2. 843–50. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 2. Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Crane JP, Cahill AG. Single umbilical artery and its associated findings. Obstet Gynecol 2010
  3. 930–4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 3. Persutte WH, Hobbins J. Single umbilical artery: a clinical enigma in modern prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995
  4. 216–29. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 4. Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD
  5. Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
  6. Genetics Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultra- sound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005
  7. 592–636. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 5. Li TG, Wang G, Xie F, Yao JM, Yang L, Wang ML, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery and postpartum outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020
  8. 6–10. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 6. Malova J, Bohmer D, Luha J, Pastorakova A, Cierna Z, Braxatorisova T. Single umbilical artery and reproduction loss- es in Slovak population: relation to karyotype and fetal anom- alies. Bratisl Lek Listy 2018
  9. 330–4. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 7. Kim HJ, Kim JH, Chay DB, Park JH, Kim MA. Association of isolated single umbilical artery with perinatal outcomes: sys- temic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2017
  10. 266–73. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 8. Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K, Snijders RJM, Bilardo CM, Mol BW, et al. Relationship of isolated sin- gle umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013
  11. 622–8. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 9. Luo X, Zhai S, Shi N, Li M, Cui S, Xu Y, et al. The risk fac- tors and neonatal outcomes of isolated single umbilical artery in singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017
  12. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 10. Friebe-Hoffmann U, Hiltmann A, Friedl TWP, Lato K, Hammer R, Janni W, et al. Prenatally diagnosed single umbil- ical artery (SUA) – Retrospective analysis of 1169 fetuses. Ultraschall Med 2019
  13. 221–9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 11. Naveiro-Fuentes M, Carrillo-Badillo MP, Malde-Conde J, Gallo-Vallejo JL, Puertas-Prieto A. Perinatal outcomes in sin- gleton pregnancies with a single umbilical artery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016
  14. 1562–5. [PubMed] [CrossRef] 12. Caldas LM, Liao A, Carvalho MH, Francisco RP, Zugaib M. Should fetal growth be a matt