SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECT OF CONSUMER-BRAND IDENTIFICATION ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY MORE: THE ROLES OF MATERIALISM, SIMILARITY AVOIDANCE, AND IMPULSIVE BUYING

TÜKETİCİ-MARKA ÖZDEŞLEŞMESİNİN DAHA ÇOK ÖDEMEYE ETKİSİ: MATERYALİZM, BENZERLİKTEN KAÇINMA VE DÜRTÜSEL SATIN ALMANIN ROLÜ

Şerife KAZANCI SUNAOĞLU
Merve VARDARSUYU
Pages
773–802
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Contributions to the theory and practice are discussed and suggestions for future studies are offered.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Consumer-brand identification has been considered an important concept to understand the reasons for establishing long-term brand relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The proposed research model is tested with data from 210 Turkish consumers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Contributions to the theory and practice are discussed and suggestions for future studies are offered.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesi · materyalizm · benzerlikten kaçınma

Abstract

Consumer-brand identification has been considered an important concept to understand the reasons for establishing long-term brand relationships. Drawing on social identity theory, it is aimed to investigate materialism as an antecedent to and willingness to purchase as a consequence of consumer-brand identification. The moderating roles of similarity avoidance and impulsive buying are also examined. The proposed research model is tested with data from 210 Turkish consumers. Findings demonstrate that materialism increases consumer-brand identification, and this effect is stronger when consumers tend to avoid similarity. Further, consumer-brand identification results in increase in customers’ willingness to pay more. Yet, contrary to expectations, this contribution is weaker in the case of higher impulsive buying. Contributions to the theory and practice are discussed and suggestions for future studies are offered.

Özet

Tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesi, tüketicileri markaya yönlendiren motivasyonların anlaşılarak onlarla uzun vadeli ilişkilerin geliştirilmesinde üzerinde önemle durulan bir kavramdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyal kimlik teorisinden yola çıkılarak tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesinin materyalizm ile ilişkisi ve sonuç olarak da daha çok ödeme isteğine katkısının incelenmesidir. Bu kapsamda ayrıca benzerlikten kaçınma ve dürtüsel satın almanın düzenleyici rolü de araştırılmaktadır. Öne sürülen araştırma modeli 210 Türk tüketiciden toplanan veri ile test edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre materyalizm tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesini artırmaktadır ve bu etki tüketiciler benzerlikten kaçınma eğiliminde olduğunda daha güçlüdür. Bununla birlikte, tüketici-marka özdeşleşmesi tüketicilerin daha çok ödemesine neden olmaktadır. Beklenenin aksine, bu etki dürtüsel satın alma davranışı yüksek olan tüketicilerde daha zayıftır. Teoriye ve uygulamaya katkılar tartışılmış ve gelecek çalışmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUNAOĞLU, Ş. K., VARDARSUYU, M. (2022). THE EFFECT OF CONSUMER-BRAND IDENTIFICATION ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY MORE: THE ROLES OF MATERIALISM, SIMILARITY AVOIDANCE, AND IMPULSIVE BUYING. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 773–802. https://ajindex.com/articles/587871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  2. Albert, N., Merunka, D. ve Valette-Florence, P. (2013). Brand Passion: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 904-909.
  3. Anderson, J. C. ve Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H. ve Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
  4. Assiouras, I., Liapati, G., Kouletsis, G. ve Koniordos, M. (2015). The Impact of Brand Authenticity on Brand Attachment in the Food Industry. British Food Journal, 117(2), 538-552.
  5. Augusto, M. ve Torres, P. (2018). Effects of Brand Attitude and Ewom on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay in the Banking Industry: Mediating Role of Consumer-brand Identification and Brand Equity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 1-10.
  6. Baskentli, S., Sen, S., Du, S. ve Bhattacharya, C. B. (2019). Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of CSR Domains. Journal of Business Research, 95, 502-513.
  7. Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265-280.
  8. Bhattacharya, C. B. ve Sen, S. (2003). Consumer–company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
  9. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  10. Büyükdağ, N. ve Kitapçı, O. (2021). Antecedents of Consumer-brand Identification in terms of Belonging Brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102420. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Multivariate Applications Series) (2nd ed.) New York: Taylor & Francis Group. Chan, K. ve Prendergast, G. (2007). Materialism and Social Comparison among Adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(2), 213-228.
  11. Coelho, P. S., Rita, P. ve Santos, Z. R. (2018). On the Relationship between Consumer-Brand Identification, Brand Community and Brand Loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 101–110.
  12. Crespo, C. F., Ferreira, A. G. ve Cardoso, R. M. (2022). The Influence of Storytelling on the Consumer–Brand Relationship Experience. Jour