Journals / Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Developments In Premedication Administered Before Chemotherapy

Kemoterapi Öncesi Uygulanan Premedikasyondaki Gelişmeler

Pages
219–225
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, more research on these topics is neces- sary as is the development of new antiemetics, thereby leading to an improvement in quality of life in patients treatedwith chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the relevant progress achieved in the last 20 years, vomiting and, especially, nausea, continue to be two of themost distressing side-effects of cancer chemotherapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the late 1990s several professional organizations publishedrecommendations on the optimal antiemetic prophylaxis in patients submitted to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, more research on these topics is neces- sary as is the development of new antiemetics, thereby leading to an improvement in quality of life in patients treatedwith chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Despite the relevant progress achieved in the last 20 years, vomiting and, especially, nausea, continue to be two of themost distressing side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. In the late 1990s several professional organizations publishedrecommendations on the optimal antiemetic prophylaxis in patients submitted to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Be- sides nausea, additional problems of antiemetic therapy such as prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced delayed nausea andvomiting, nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose chemotherapy and nausea and vomiting induced by combined chemoradiation as well as antiemetics in children remain unsolved. Therefore, more research on these topics is neces- sary as is the development of new antiemetics, thereby leading to an improvement in quality of life in patients treatedwith chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

Özet

Son yirmi yılda elde edilen gelişmelere rağmen, bulantı ve özellikle kusma, kanser kemoterapisinin en sıkıntılı iki yanetkisi olamaya devam etmektedir. 1990lı yılların sonlarında birçok profesyonel kuruluş kemoterapi ve radyoterapiuygulanacak hastalara yönelik uygun antiemetik proflaksi için öneriler yayınlamışlardır. Bulantının yanı sıra, sisplatinaracılı gecikmiş bulantı kusmada antiemetik tedavi, yüksek doz kemoterapiye bağlı bulantı ve kusma tedavisi, kom- bine kemoradyoterapi ilişkili bulantı ve kusmada tedavi ile çocuklarda kullanılacak antiemetiklerin neler olacağı gibiek sorunlar da karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu konular üzerinde daha fazla araştırmaya ihtiyaç bulunmaktadır.Yeni antiemetiklerin geliştirilmesi ile kemoterapi ve/veya radyoterapi gören hastaların yaşam kalitesi de artacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARI, E., İMAMOĞLU, G. İ., ÇOLAK, D., KÖSE, N., ALTINBAŞ, M. (2022). Developments In Premedication Administered Before Chemotherapy. Ortadoğu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 219–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/585939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Markmann M et.al. Progress in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 1441
  2. Gadducci A, Tana R, Teti G, et al. Analysis of the pattern of hyper- sensitivity reactions in patients receiving carboplatin retreatment for recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18: 615- 20
  3. Polyzos A,Tsavaris N,Gogas H,Souglakos J,Vambakas L,Vardakas N,Polyzos K,Tsigris C,Mantas D,Papachristodoulou A,Nikiteas N,Karavokyros J.G,Felekouras E, Griniatsos J,Giannopoulos A,Kouraklis G. Clinical Features of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Oxaliplatin: A 10-Year Experience Oncology 2009;76: 36–41
  4. Suenaga M, Mizunuma N, Shinozaki E, et al. Management of al- lergic reactions to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer patients. J Sup- port Oncol. 2008;6: 373–8
  5. Leguy-Seguin V, Jolimoy G, Coudert B, Pernot C, Dalac S, Vab- res P, Collet E etçal. Diagnostic and predictive value of skin testing in platinum salt hypersensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119:726-30
  6. Mariana C Castells, MD, PhDUrsula A Matulonis, MD. Infu- sion reactions to systemic chemotherapy. Allergy Asthma Proc 2011;32: 79
  7. Syrigou E et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to docetaxel: retrospec- tive evaluation and development of a desensitization protocol. Int Arch Allergy İmmunol 2011;156:3200
  8. Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH, et al: Hypersensitivity re- actions from taxol. J Clin Oncol 8:1263-1268, 1990
  9. Bookman MA, Kloth DD, Kover PE, et al. Short-course intrave- nous prophylaxis for paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Oncol 8:611-614, 1997
  10. Markman M, Kennedy A, Webster K, et al. An effective and more convenient drug regimen for prophylaxis against paclitaxel- associated hypersensitivity reactions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 125:427-429, 1999
  11. Micha JP, Rettenmaier MA, Dillman R, et al. Single-dose dexa- methasone paclitaxel premedication. Gynecol Oncol 69:122-124, 1998. 12. lmanell Jell et al. Systemic Therapy Emergencies. Semin Oncol 2000;27:347
  12. Maurie Markman, Alexander Kennedy, Kenneth Webster, Paul El- son, Gertrude Peterson. Clinical Features of Hypersensitivity Re- actions to Carboplatin. J Clin Oncol 17:1141-1145
  13. Barbara Kulp and Jerome Belinson. Paclitaxel-Associated Hyper- sensitivity Reactions: Experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. J Clin Oncol 18:102-105
  14. Burris HA et al. Optimal use of docetaxel (Taxotere): Maximizing its potential. Anticancer Drugs 1996;