Journals / Türk Patoloji Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Clinical and Histopathological Findings in Microscopic Colitis

Pages
275–283
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Given that microscopic colitis is a common treatable cause of chronic diarrhea, awareness of the aforementioned histopathological features is of utmost importance for accurate diagnosis and not to miss incomplete cases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by a triad of chronic diarrhea, endoscopy without significant abnormality, and distinct histopathological features.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Histopathologically, microscopic colitis is divided into 3 subtypes; collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis, incomplete microscopic colitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Given that microscopic colitis is a common treatable cause of chronic diarrhea, awareness of the aforementioned histopathological features is of utmost importance for accurate diagnosis and not to miss incomplete cases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Microscopic colitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by a triad of chronic diarrhea, endoscopy without significant abnormality, and distinct histopathological features. Histopathologically, microscopic colitis is divided into 3 subtypes; collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis, incomplete microscopic colitis. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the detailed clinicopathological parameters of microscopic colitis cases in the Turkish population. Material and Method: The clinicopathological parameters were evaluated in 53 microscopic colitis cases (37 collagenous colitis, 7 lymphocytic colitis, 9 incomplete microscopic colitis) diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. Results: All cases had lymphoplasmacytosis. The presence of ≥20 eosinophils/high power field in the lamina propria was remarkable in 75.7%, 57.1%, and 11.1% of collagenous colitis, lymphocytic colitis, and incomplete microscopic colitis cases, respectively. One of the striking findings was the presence of concomitant Celiac disease in 29% of the lymphocytic colitis cases. In terms of drug use, proton pump inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly used drugs. Conclusion: The mean age in our series is lower than the literature and a distinct male predominance was observed in lymphocytic colitis and incomplete microscopic colitis, contrary to the literature. These suggest that susceptibility to microscopic colitis may differ between ethnic groups. The presence of overt lymphoplasmacytosis, eosinophilic infiltration and epithelial damage are the microscopic features which should alert the pathologist for the diagnosis of complete microscopic colitis. Given that microscopic colitis is a common treatable cause of chronic diarrhea, awareness of the aforementioned histopathological features is of utmost importance for accurate diagnosis and not to miss incomplete cases.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPEL, G., CAKIR, E., AYDIN, I., DILEK, F. H., SARI, A. A. (2022). Analysis of Clinical and Histopathological Findings in Microscopic Colitis. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 275–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/655194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Langner C, Aust D, Ensari A, Villanacci V, Becheanu G, Miehlke S, Geboes K, Münch A; Working Group of Digestive Diseases of the European Society of Pathology (ESP) and the European Microscopic Colitis Group (EMCG). Histology of microscopic colitis-review with a practical approach for pathologists. Histopathology. 2015;66:613-26
  2. Stoicescu A, Becheanu G, Dumbrava M, Gheorghe C, Diculescu M. Microscopic colitis - a missed diagnosis in diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Maedica (Bucur). 2012;7(1):3-9
  3. Olesen M, Eriksson S, Bohr J, Järnerot G, Tysk C. Microscopic colitis: A common diarrhoeal disease. An epidemiological study in Örebro, Sweden, 1993-1998. Gut. 2004;53:346-50. Tong J, Zheng Q, Zhang C, Lo R, Shen J, Ran Z. Incidence, prevalence, and temporal trends of microscopic colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:265
  4. Shor J, Churrango G, Hosseini N, Marshall C. Management of microscopic colitis: Challenges and solutions. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:111-20
  5. Münch A, Langner C. Microscopic colitis: Clinical and pathologic perspectives. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:228-36
  6. Boland K, Nguyen GC. Microscopic colitis: A review of collagenous and lymphocytic colitis. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;13:671-7
  7. Münch A, Aust D, Bohr J, Bonderup O, Fernández Bañares F, Hjortswang H, Madisch A, Munck LK, Ström M, Tysk C, Miehlke S; European Microscopic Colitis Group (EMCG). Microscopic colitis: Current status, present and future challenges: Statements of the European Microscopic Colitis Group. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6:932-45
  8. Rasmussen J, Heiberg Engel PJ, Wildt S, Fiehn AMK, Munck LK. The temporal evolution of histological abnormalities in microscopic colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:262-8
  9. Engel PJH, Fiehn AMK, Munck LK, Kristensson M. The subtypes of microscopic colitis from a pathologist’s perspective: Past, present and future. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:69
  10. Pardi DS. Diagnosis and management of microscopic colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:78-85
  11. Nielsen OH, Vainer B, Muckadell OB. Microscopic colitis: A missed diagnosis? Lancet. 2004;364:2055-7
  12. Fiehn AMK, Bjørnbak C, Warnecke M, Engel PJH, Munck LK. Observer variability in the histopathologic diagnosis of microscopic colitis and subgroups. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:2461-6
  13. Nyhlin N, Wickbom A, Montgomery SM, Tysk C, Bohr J. Long- term prognosis of clinical symptoms and health-related quality of life in microscopic