Journals / Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30

Paradoxes in the macrocosm and the microcosm

Büyük ve küçük evrenlerdeki paradokslar

Pages
265–276
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Modern science has confirmed this theory, by talking about quarks, which are unextended and massless.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Author deals with the subject paradox which has a special interest in Kant’s philosophy, by referring to works of the important people in the philosophy of science, and argues the subject scientifically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After emphasizes on various meanings of paradox, he mentions paradox or antinomy in philosophical and scientific fields.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Modern science has confirmed this theory, by talking about quarks, which are unextended and massless.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Author deals with the subject paradox which has a special interest in Kant’s philosophy, by referring to works of the important people in the philosophy of science, and argues the subject scientifically. After emphasizes on various meanings of paradox, he mentions paradox or antinomy in philosophical and scientific fields. In this writing, it is suggested that philosophers in a certain sense have already resolved the scientific developments in our time. The finest example of this is Leibniz’s theory of monad. Modern science has confirmed this theory, by talking about quarks, which are unextended and massless.

Özet

Yazar, Kant felsefesinde özel bir öneme sahip olan paradoks konusunu bilim felsefesinin önemli şahsiyetlerinin eserlerine başvurarak ele almakta ve konuyu bilimsel açıdan tartışmaktadır. Paradoksun çeşitli anlamları üzerinde durduktan sonra, felsefe ve bilim alanlarındaki paradokstan yani antinomiden bahsetmektedir. Bu yazıda, çağımızdaki bilimsel gelişmelerin daha önce filozoflar tarafından belli anlamda çözümlendiği ileri sürülmektedir. Bunun en güzel örneği Leibniz’in monad kuramıdır. Modern bilim, uzamsız ve kütlesiz atomlar olan kuarklardan bahsederek bu kuramı doğrulamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNER, İ. (2022). Paradoxes in the macrocosm and the microcosm. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 30, 265–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/585376

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Shaw, W. David, Elegy and Paradox: Testing the Conventions (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994).
  2. Kainz, Howard P., Paradox, Dialectic and System: A Contemporary Reconstruction of the Hegelian Problematic (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1988).
  3. Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965).
  4. Hoyle, Fred, The Nature of the Universe (New York: Harper, 1950);
  5. Herman Bondi, Cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952); Georges La- maître, L’Hypothèse de l’Atom Primitif (Paris: Dunoid, 1946).
  6. Hoyle, Fred‚The Universe: Past and Present Reflections‛, Engineering and Science, November 1981.
  7. Davies, Paul, The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992).
  8. Augustine, Confessions, trans. Edward B. Pusey (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britanni- ca, 1952).
  9. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, The Monadology, trans. Robert Latta (Irvine, CA: World Library Electronic Texts, 1994).
  10. Lederman, Leon & Dick Teresi, The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question? (New York: Bantam Doubleday, 1994).
  11. Capra, Fritjof, The Tao of Physics (Boston: Shambala, 1991).
  12. Jaki, Stanley, The Bible and Science (Front Royal, VA: Christendom Press, 1996).