Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Uçuçu kül ve fosfoalçının yapı elemanı üretiminde kullanım olanakları

Usability of fly ash and phosphogypsum in manufacturing of building products

Pages
273–278
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the basis of the test results, it was concluded that phosphogypsum decreased the compressive and flexural strength while fly ash increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the class-C fly ash, lime and phosphogypsum were used with water to produce fly ash-limephosphogypsum (FaL-G) based binders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The dry unit weight, water absorption, compressive and flexural strength of the specimens was determined after 28 days of their preparation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the basis of the test results, it was concluded that phosphogypsum decreased the compressive and flexural strength while fly ash increased.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the class-C fly ash, lime and phosphogypsum were used with water to produce fly ash-limephosphogypsum (FaL-G) based binders. The dry unit weight, water absorption, compressive and flexural strength of the specimens was determined after 28 days of their preparation. On the basis of the test results, it was concluded that phosphogypsum decreased the compressive and flexural strength while fly ash increased. It was also concluded that the curing conditions have an important influence on the strengths of FaL-G specimens. These binders gain furthers strength after 28 days. For the strength requirements, phosphogypsum content should be constant as 20%. The water absorption and thermal conductivity of the specimens increases with the increase in phosphogypsum content. Also the increase in the amount of phosphogypsum addition caused a reduction in the dry unit weight of the specimens. The test results show that these binders may be utilized in production of construction elements such as blocks, masonry mortars and controlled low-strength materials.

Özet

Bu çalışmada uçucu kül, kireç ve fosfoalçı kullanılarak uçucu kül-kireç-fosfoalçı esaslı bir bağlayıcı üretilmiştir. 28 günlük numunelerin su emme, kuru birim ağırlık, basınç ve çekme dayanımları tayin edilmiştir. Deney sonuçlarına göre fosfojips basınç ve çekme dayanımını azaltırken, uçucu kül dayanımları arttırmaktadır. Kür koşulları da dayanımlar üzerinde etkili olmaktadır. Uçucu kül-kireç-fosfoalçı esaslı bu bağlayıcı 28 günden sonra dayanım kazanmaktadır. Dayanım gerekliliği nedeniyle fosfoalçı oranı %20 olarak sabit tutulmalıdır. Numunelerin su emmesi ve ısı iletkenliği fosfoalçı oranı ile artmaktadır. Aynı zamanda fosfoalçı oranındaki artış birim ağırlığın azalmasına neden olmaktadır. Deney sonuçları geliştirilen bağlayıcının blok eleman, harç ve düşük dayanımlı malzeme üretiminde kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUCU, A., DEĞİRMENCİ, N. (2022). Uçuçu kül ve fosfoalçının yapı elemanı üretiminde kullanım olanakları. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 273–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/583323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altun I. A., Sert Y. 2004. “Utilization of Weathered Phosphogypsum as Set Retarder in Portland Cement” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 34, pp. 677-680. Anonymous, 1977. TS 2848 Mortar for Masonry, TSI, Ankara. Anonymous, 1979. TS 704 Clay Bricks (Wall Tile), TSI, Ankara. Anonymous, 1985. TS 705 Solid Bricks and Vertically Perforated Bricks, TSI, Ankara. Anonymous, 1994a. ASTM C618-92a. “Standard Specification for Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as Mmineral Admixture in Portland Cement” Concrete.Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.02, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. Anonymous, 1994b. EN 450, “Fly Ash for Concrete-Definitions, Requirement and Quality Control”, Brussels. Anonymous, 1994c. ACI 229R-94 Report. Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM). Concrete International. 16, 55-64. Anonymous, 1998. TS EN 450-1,
  2. Fly Ash for Concrete, Definitions, Requirement and Quality Control. TSI, Ankara. Anonymous, 2002. TS EN 196-1, Methods of Testing Cement-Part 1; Determination of Strength. TSI, Ankara.
  3. Atiş, C.D., Sevim, U.K., Özcan, F., Bilim, C., Karahan, O., Tanrikulu A.H., Ekşi, A. 2004 “Strength Properties of Roller Compacted Concrete Containing a Non-standard High Calcium Fly Ash” Materials Letters. Vol. 58, pp.1446-1450.
  4. Kumar, S. 2002. “A Perspective Study on the Fly Ash-Lime-Gypsum Bricks and Hollow Blocks for Cost Housing Development” Construction and Building Materials Vol.16, pp. 519-525.
  5. Kumar, S. 2003. “Fly Ash-Lime-Phosphogypsum Hollow Blocks for Walls and Partitions” Building and Environment. Vol. 38, pp. 291-295.
  6. Oner, A., Akyuz, S., Yildiz R. 2005. “An Experimental Study on Strength Development of Concrete Containing Fly Ash and Optimum Usage of Fly Ash in Concrete” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol 35, pp. 1165-1171.
  7. Singh M., Garg M. 2000. “Making of Anhydrite Cement from Waste Gypsum” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 30, pp. 571-577.
  8. Singh, M. 2002. “Treating Waste Phosphogypsum for Cement and Plaster Manufacture” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 32, pp.1033-1038.
  9. Singh, M., Garg, M. 1999. “Cementitious Binder from Fly Ash and Other Industrial Wastes” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, pp. 309-314.
  10. Smadi, M.M., Haddad, R.H., Akour, A.M. 1999. “Potential Use of Phoshogypsum in Concrete” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, pp. 1419-1425.
  11. Verbeek, C. J. R. W., Du Plesis, B. J. G. 2005. “Density and Flexural Strength of Phosphogypsumpolymer Composites” Construction and Building Materials. Vol.19, pp. 265-274.
  12. Yazıcı H., Yiğiter, H., Aydın