Journals / Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Trafiğin yol boykesiti doğrultusundaki akım karekteristikleri üzerine bir literatür derlemesi

An overview of longitudinal characteristics of road traffic flow

Pages
247–254
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the paper underlines a number of possible areas for future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As multi-lane roadways have been widely used in many countries for years, analysis of two-dimensional vehicular interactions acquires special importance in highway design and operation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The simultaneous consideration of both lateral and longitudinal movements of traffic flow becomes vital in many aspects of traffic engineering, like modelling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the paper underlines a number of possible areas for future research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As multi-lane roadways have been widely used in many countries for years, analysis of two-dimensional vehicular interactions acquires special importance in highway design and operation. The simultaneous consideration of both lateral and longitudinal movements of traffic flow becomes vital in many aspects of traffic engineering, like modelling. The former component was reviewed elsewhere. In this paper, previous work on longitudinal characteristics of multi-lane traffic flow is scrutinised. Non-existence of such a review in recent literature was the main motive of the work, and it is hoped that it forms a reference report for other traffic analysts. In addition, the paper underlines a number of possible areas for future research.

Özet

Çok şeritli yolların birçok ülkede uzun yıllardan beri kullanılmasıyla, araç etkileşimlerinin iki boyutlu incelenmesi, yolların planlanması ve işletilmesi noktalarında özel bir önem sergilemiştir. Trafiğin yol enkesiti ve boy kesiti doğrultusundaki akım karakteristiklerinin aynı anda gözönüne alınması modelleme gibi birtakım trafik mühendisliği uygulamaları açısından hayatiyet arzetmektedir. Birinci kısım, yani enine yöndeki araç hareketleri üzerine bir literatür derlemesi daha önceden yayınlanmıştı. Bu makalede çok şeritli trafik akımı boylamasına olarak incelenecektir. Henüz böyle bir literatür taramasının yapılmamış olması bu çalışmanın ilk motivasyonunu oluşturmuştur ve diğer trafik mühendisleri için referans bir yayın olacağı ümid edilmektedir. Ayrıca makalede, gelecekte yapılabilecek araştırma alanlarının da altı çizilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, B. (2022). Trafiğin yol boykesiti doğrultusundaki akım karekteristikleri üzerine bir literatür derlemesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 247–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/653350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Anonymous, 1985. TRB. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board National Research Council. Anonymous, 1975. TRRL. The Minimum Braking Distance Obtained With Some Cars and Heavy Goods Vehicles. TRRL lealet, LF 537. Bell, M. G. H. 1995. Information Technology in Transport. MSc Unpublished Lecture Notes, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne. Benekohal, R. F. and J. Treiterer 1988. CARSIM: Car-Following Model For Simulation of Traffic in Normal and Stop-and-go Conditions. Transportation Research Record 1194, 99-111.
  2. Branston, D. 1977. Some Factors Affecting the Capacity of a Motorway. Traffic Engineering and Control 18 (6), 304-307.
  3. Bunker, J. M. and R. J. Troutbeck 1995. Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Within Freeway Lanes. Transportation Research Record 1510, 19-25.
  4. Ceder, A. 1976. A Deterministic Traffic Flow Model For the Two-Regime Approach. Transportation Research Record 567, 16-30.
  5. Chandler, R. E., R. Herman and E. W. Montroll 1958. Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following. Operations Research 6 (2), 165-184.
  6. Chishaki, T. and Y. Tamura 1984. “Headway Distribution Model Based on the Distinction Between Leaders and Followers” The Ninth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Delft, The Netherlands, Utrecht. Colbourn, C. J., I. D. Brown and A. K. Copeman 1978. Drivers' Judgments of Safe Distances in Vehicle Following. Human Factors 20 (1), 1-11.
  7. Davies, E. 1968. Traffic Engineering and Practice. E. & F. N. Spon Ltd. London.Edie, L. C. 1961. Car-Following and Steady-State Theory For Noncongested Traffic. Operations Research 9 (1), 66-76.
  8. Evans, L. and R. Rothery 1976. The Influence of Forward Vision and Target Size on Apparent Inter- Vehicular Spacing. Transportation Science (10), 85-101.
  9. Forbes, T. W. 1963. Human Factor Considerations in Traffic Flow Theory. Highway Research Record (15), 60-66.
  10. Gazis, D. C., R. Herman and R. B. Potts 1959. Car-Following Theory of Steady-State Traffic Flow. Operations Research 7 (4), 499-505.
  11. Gazis, D. C., R. Herman and G. H. Weiss 1962. Density Oscillations Between Lanes of a Multilane Highway. Operations Research 10, 658-667.
  12. Gipps, P. G. 1981. A Behavioral Car Following Model For Computer Simulation. Transportation Research 15B, 105-111.
  13. Golias, J. and D. Tsamboulas 1995. Macrolevel Estimation of Highway Lane Usage. Journal of Transportation Engineering 121 (1), 40-49.
  14. Gunay, B., M. G. H. Bell and K. Sung 1997. A Simulation Analogy For Untidy Multi-Lane Traffic Flows. Journal of the East