SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 19

Categorical investigation of researches in psychological capital between 2003-2011 years

Psikolojik sermaye konusunda 2003-2011 yıllarında yapılan çalışmaların kategorik olarak incelenmesi

Turhan ERKMEN
Emel ESEN
Pages
89–103
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results of the study, the studies were conducted between 2010 and 2010 years in America at education sector, mostly likert type scale used, correlation and multiple regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis were selected.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the publications categorically about psychological capital which is a new subject in Organizational Behavior area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By this purpose, 35 journals, 2 master thesis and 12 dissertation thesis were searched, total 49 publications, 44 empirical, 5 theoretic were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results of the study, the studies were conducted between 2010 and 2010 years in America at education sector, mostly likert type scale used, correlation and multiple regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis were selected.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the publications categorically about psychological capital which is a new subject in Organizational Behavior area. By this purpose, 35 journals, 2 master thesis and 12 dissertation thesis were searched, total 49 publications, 44 empirical, 5 theoretic were examined. In content analysis, a classification was conducted according to years, countries, sectors, sampling, analysis techniques, scale and related variables with psychological capital. According to results of the study, the studies were conducted between 2010 and 2010 years in America at education sector, mostly likert type scale used, correlation and multiple regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis were selected.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2003-2011 yılları arasında Örgütsel Davranış alanında yeni bir çalışma alanı olan psikolojik sermaye konusunda yapılan çalışmaların kategorik olarak incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla, psikolojik sermaye konusunda ulaşılabilen 35 dergi, 2 yüksek lisans ve 12 doktora tezi taranarak, 44 tane uygulamalı, 5 tane teorik olmak üzere toplam 49 çalışma içerik analizi ile incelenmiştir. İçerik analizinde, yayınların yıllara, ülkelere, sektörlere, örnekleme, kullanılan analiz türüne, kullanılan ölçek türüne ve psikolojik sermaye ile ilişkili değişkenlere göre sınıflandırılması yapılmıştır. Çıkan sonuçlara göre, 9 yıllık zaman dilimi içerisinde, en çok 2010 ve 2011 yıllarında psikolojik sermaye ile ilgili çalışmaların yapıldığı, en çok Amerikada ve özellikle eğitim sektöründe, üniversitelerde bu konu üzerine çalışıldığı, çok büyük örneklem yapıları ile çalışılmasa da, ölçek türü olarak en fazla likert tipi ölçek, analiz olarak ise, korelasyon, çoklu regresyonun, doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin sıklıkla kullanıldığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKMEN, T., ESEN, E. (2022). Categorical investigation of researches in psychological capital between 2003-2011 years. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 19, 89–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/583003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abdullah, M. C. (2009). Leadership and Psycap: A Study of the Relationship Between Positive Leadership Behaviors and Followers’ Positive Psychological Capital. Doktora Tezi, Capella University, USA. Avey, J., Wernsing, T. ve Luthans, F. (2008). ‘‘Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors’’. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48- 70. Avey, J., Patera, J. L. ve West, B. J. (2006). ‘‘The Implications of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Absenteeism’’. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13 (2), 42-60.
  2. Avey, J., Luthans F. ve Jensen, S. (2009). ‘‘Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource for Combating Employee Stress and Turnover’’. Human Resource Management, 48 (5), 677-693.
  3. Avey, J., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F. ve Mhatre, K. H. (2011). ‘‘Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviors, and Performance’’. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127- 152. Avey, J., Wernsing, T., Luthans, F. (2008). ‘‘Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors’’. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48- 70. Avey, J., Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. (2008). ‘‘The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviors’’. Journal of Management, 36, 430-452.
  4. Avey, J. (2007). The Performance Impact of Leader Positive Psychological Capital and Situational Complexity, University of Nebraska, Doktora Tezi. Bartee, L. M. (2011). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Psychological Capital in Urban High Schools. Doktora Tezi, Walden University. Brewer, J. F. (2010).
  5. Leader Character Quality, Goal Achivement, Psychological Capital, and Spirituality among The American Physical Therapy Association. Doktora Tezi, Dallas Baptist University. Caza, A., R. P. Bagozzi, L. Wooley, L. Levy ve B. B. Caza (2010). ‘‘Psychological Capital and Authentic Leadership’’. Asia- Pasific Journal of Business Management, 2,1, 53-70.
  6. Clapp- Smith, R., Luthans, F. ve Avolio, B. (2006). ‘‘The Role of Psychological Capital in Global Mindset Development’’. Advances in International Management, 19, 105-130.
  7. Çetin, F. (2011). ‘‘The Effects of the Organizational Psychological Capital on the attitudes of Commitment and Satisfaction: A Public Sample in Tur