Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

A COMPARISON OF INTERNAL AUDITING PRACTICES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS OF TURKEY

TÜRKİYE'DE İÇ DENETİMİN KAMU VE ÖZEL SEKTÖR UYGULAMALARI AÇISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI*

Pages
119–142
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results of the independent sample t-tests applied to 252 surveys, suggest that there are major differences in the organizational positions and in relations with senior management of internal auditors in two sectors, in which public sector auditors are less satisfied

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims inter-sectoral comparison of internal audit activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, futures examined include recruitment of internal auditors, organizational position of the department, duties, powers and responsibilities, relationships with senior management, external auditors and reporting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results of the independent sample t-tests applied to 252 surveys, suggest that there are major differences in the organizational positions and in relations with senior management of internal auditors in two sectors, in which public sector auditors are less satisfied
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims inter-sectoral comparison of internal audit activities. In this context, futures examined include recruitment of internal auditors, organizational position of the department, duties, powers and responsibilities, relationships with senior management, external auditors and reporting. The basis of there search is the survey which was sent to public and private sector internal auditors. Results of the independent sample t-tests applied to 252 surveys, suggest that there are major differences in the organizational positions and in relations with senior management of internal auditors in two sectors, in which public sector auditors are less satisfied

Özet

Bu çalışma, iç denetim faaliyetlerinin, sektörler arası karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda iç denetçi işe alımı, denetim biriminin kurum içi pozisyonu, denetçilerin görev, yetki ve sorumlulukları, üst yönetimle ilişkiler, dış denetçilerle ilişkiler ve raporlama başlıkları ele alınmıştır. Araştırmanın temelini, kamu ve özel sektörde çalışan iç denetçilere gönderilen anket oluş- turmaktadır. Değerlendirilen 252 ankete uygulanan bağımsız örneklem t-testi neticesinde, iç denetçilerin görüşlerine göre iç denetim uygulamaları açısından sektörlerin en çok ayrıldığı noktaların, birimin kurum içi pozisyonu ve üst yönetimle ilişkileri olduğu belirlenmiş ve bu konularda kamu iç denetçilerinin memnuniyetsizliği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜL, D. Ç. (2022). A COMPARISON OF INTERNAL AUDITING PRACTICES IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS OF TURKEY. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 119–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/582436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abbass, D. A. ve M. M.Aleqab (2013)“Internalauditors’ characteristicsandauditfees: EvidencefromEgyptianfirms” International Business Research 6(4): 67 -80. Abbott, L. J.,Parker, S. ve G. F.Peters (2012)“Auditfeereductionsfrominternalaudit-providedassistance: Theincrementalimpact ofinternalauditcharacteri stics”Contemporary Accounting Research 29(1): 94 – 118 Adel, B. ve T.Maissa (2013)“Interactionbetweenauditcommitteeandinternalaudit: evidencefromTunisia”The IUP Journalof CorporateGovernance 12(2): 59-80
  2. Allegrini, M.,G. D’onza, L. Paape, R. MelvilleveG.Sarens (2006)“TheEuropeanliteraturereview on internalauditing” Managerial Auditing Journal 21 (8): 845-853
  3. Brody, R. G. ve K. E. Frank(2000)“Thefuture of thecertifiedinternalauditorandtheinternalauditingposition” Journal of Educationfor Business 85(4): 215- 218 Chowdhury, R. R.,J.InnesveR. Kouhy (2005)“Thepublicsectorauditexpectationsgap in Bangladesh”Managerial Auditing Journal 20(8): 893-908
  4. Cohen, A. ve G.Sayag (2010) “The effectiveness of internal auditing: an empirical examination of itsdeterminants in Israelorganisations” Australian Accounting Review 20(3): 296-307
  5. Davies, M. (2009)“Effectiveworkingrelationshipbetweenauditcommitteesandinternalaudit- thecornerstone of corporategovernance in localauthorities, a Welshperspective”Journal of Management andGovernance 13(1): 41-73
  6. Felix, W. L., A. A. Gramling ve M. J. Maletta (2001)“The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of externalauditfeesandfactorsinfluencingthiscontribution” Journal of Accounting Research 39(3): 513-534
  7. Goodwin, J. (2003)“Therelationshipbetweentheauditcommitteeandtheinternalauditfunction: evidencefromAustraliaand New Zealand” International Journal of Auditing 7(3): 263-278
  8. Goodwin, J. (2004)“A comparison of internalaudit in the private andpublicsectorManagerial Auditing Journal” 19(5): 640-650
  9. Goodwin- Stewart, J. ve P. Kent. (2006)“Relationbetweenexternalauditfees, auditcommitteecharacteristicsandinternalaudit” Accounting and Finance 46: 387–404 Hay, D. C. (2013)“Furtherevidencefrom meta-analysis of auditfeeresearch” International Journal of Auditing 17: 162 -176 Holt, T.P. ve T. De Zoort.(2009) “The effects of internal audit report disclosure on investor confidence and investment decisions” International Journal of Auditing 13(1): 61-77
  10. Kara, S. ve Ş. Sakarya (2012) “Kurumsal Risk Yönetimi Çerçevesinde Risk Odaklı İç Denetim ve İMKB Uygulaması” Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi 2012-1: 69-95
  11. Kara, S. ve A.N. Yereli (2