Journals / Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE'DE YAYINLANAN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK RAPORLARININ GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI) TARAFINDANYAYINLANANSTANDARTLARAUYUMUNUN TESPİTİNE YÖNELİK AMPRİK BİR ÇALIŞMA

ANEMPRICALSTUDYFORDETERMININGTHE COMPLIANCE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTS PUBLISHED IN TURKEY WITH STANDARS PUBLISHEDBY GLOBALREPORTINGINITIATIVE (GRI)

Pages
393–420
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the findings of study revealed that sustainability reports are not at sufficient level in terms of independent audit and there are deficiencies in compliance with the GRI-G4 Standards

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Thanks to rapid advances in communication technologies, consumers and investors have become more sensitive to environmental issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, businesses started to pay attention to the price of products purchased, their profits as well as their environmental awareness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the findings of study revealed that sustainability reports are not at sufficient level in terms of independent audit and there are deficiencies in compliance with the GRI-G4 Standards
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Thanks to rapid advances in communication technologies, consumers and investors have become more sensitive to environmental issues. Therefore, businesses started to pay attention to the price of products purchased, their profits as well as their environmental awareness. In the context of these developments, businesses have begun to publish their sustainability reports on behalf of their consumers and investors. In this paper, sustainability reports of companies operating in Turkey were studied and interpreted by means of content analysis. As a result, the findings of study revealed that sustainability reports are not at sufficient level in terms of independent audit and there are deficiencies in compliance with the GRI-G4 Standards

Özet

İletişim teknolojilerinin gelişmesi ile birlikte tüketiciler ve yatırımcılar çevresel etkilere daha duyarlı hale gelmiş, aldığı ürün veya menkul kıymetin fiyatı ve getirisinin yanında işletmenin çevresel duyarlılığına da dikkat etmeye başlamıştır. İşletmeler bu durum karşısında tüketicilere ve yatırımcılara yönelik sürdürülebilirlik raporları yayınlamaya başlamışlardır. Çalışmamızda, Türkiye'de faaliyet gösteren şirketler tarafından yayınlanan sürdürülebilirlik raporları içerik analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilip sonuçlar yorumlanmıştır. Çalışmamızın sonucunda, sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının bağımsız denetiminin yetersiz olduğu ve ayrıca GRI-G4 standartlarına uyumda yetersizlikler olduğu tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLAK, B., GÖNEN, S. (2022). TÜRKİYE'DE YAYINLANAN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK RAPORLARININ GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI) TARAFINDANYAYINLANANSTANDARTLARAUYUMUNUN TESPİTİNE YÖNELİK AMPRİK BİR ÇALIŞMA. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 393–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/582359

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Asia Development Bank. 2012. World Sustainable Development Timeline. Bansal, P. and R. D. J. Mark. 2014. "Business sustainability: It is about time", Strategic Organization, 12(1). Basiago, A. D. 1999. "Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice", The Environmentalist,19. Caymaz, E., S. Soran, F. ve Erenel. 2014. "The Relationship in between Responsibility in Business: Global Compact Turkey", Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics,1(3). Corporate Social Dyllick, T., K. Hockerts. 2002. "Beyond the Case for Corporate Sustainability", Business Strategy and the Environment. Dutta S., A. R Lawson, and J. D. Marcinko. 2016. "A Management Control System to Support Corporate Sustainability Strategies", Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting. Ergüden, E.A., C.T. Kaya. 2014. "Deficiencies of Turkish SMEs with Regard to Sustainability, Corporate Governance and Accounting Policies", Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 3(1). Fauzi, H., S. Goran and A. R. Azhar. 2010. "Triple Bottom Line as Sustainable Corporate Performance", Sustainability, 2. Feijoo, B F., S. Romero and S Ruiz. 2014. " Effect of Stakeholders' Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framwork", Journal of Business Ethics, 122. Fonseca, A., M. McAllister, and P. Fitzpatrick. 2014. "Sustainability Reporting Among Mining Corporations: A Constructive Critique of the GRI Approach", Journal of Cleanar Production, 84. Hahn, T., P. Lutz, P. Jonatan and F. Frank. 2015. "Cognitive Frames in Corporate Paradoxical and Business Case Frames", Academy of Management Review, 4015. Managerial Sensemaking with Higgins C, J. M. Markus and G. Bernadine. 2015. "The Uptake of Sustainability Reporting in Australia", Journal of Business Ethics,129. Higgins, C. and C. Brian. 2016. "Improving How Sustainability Reports Drive Change: A Critical Discourse Analysis", Journal of Cleaner Production. James, M. L. 2015. "The Benefits of Sustainability and Integrated Reporting: An Investigation of Accounting Majors Perceptions", Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 18(1). Jones, P., C. Daphne and H. David. 2016. "Materiality in Corporate Sustainability Reporting within UK Retailing", Journal of Public Affairs,16(1). Junior, R. M., J.B. Peter and C. Julie. 2014. "Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon", J Bus Ethics, 120. Karataş Çetin Ç., S