SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

The Effects of Two Different SelfAdjusting File Working Times and Three Different Chelating Agents on the Root Canal Filling Bond Strength

İki Farklı Self-Adjusting File Çalışma Süresinin ve Üç Farklı Şelasyon Ajanının Kök Kanal Dolgusunun Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkileri

Tuğrul ASLAN
İbrahim ŞENER
Pages
233–239
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the coronal thirds, G6 and G8 indicated significantly greater bond strength values than G1 and G5 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different self-adjusting file (SAF) working times and three different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of root canal fillings in oval root canals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Eighty mandibular premolars were selected and distributed into 8 groups (n=10): 4 min SAF (G1), 4 min SAF + 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (G2), 4 min SAF + 10% citric acid (CA) (G3), 4 min SAF + 1% peracetic acid (PAA) (G4), 6 min SAF (G5), 6 min SAF + 17% EDTA (G6), 6 min SAF + 10% CA (G7), and 6 min SAF + 1% PAA (G8).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the coronal thirds, G6 and G8 indicated significantly greater bond strength values than G1 and G5 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different self-adjusting file (SAF) working times and three different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of root canal fillings in oval root canals. Materials and Methods: Eighty mandibular premolars were selected and distributed into 8 groups (n=10): 4 min SAF (G1), 4 min SAF + 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (G2), 4 min SAF + 10% citric acid (CA) (G3), 4 min SAF + 1% peracetic acid (PAA) (G4), 6 min SAF (G5), 6 min SAF + 17% EDTA (G6), 6 min SAF + 10% CA (G7), and 6 min SAF + 1% PAA (G8). The root canals were filled using guttapercha and AH Plus root canal sealer, and the teeth were prepared for the push-out assessments using 1.0 mm thick root slices. Loading was performed with a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min; and then, collected data were analyzed statistically (α=0.05). Results: While the different chelating agents significantly affected the push-out bond strength of the root canal filling (p0.05). There were no significant differences among the groups in the apical and middle thirds of the roots (p>0.05). In the coronal thirds, G6 and G8 indicated significantly greater bond strength values than G1 and G5 (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, oval kök kanallarında iki farklı self-adjusting file (SAF) çalışma süresinin ve üç farklı şelasyon ajanının kök kanal dolgusunun push-out bağlanma dayanımı üzerine etkisinin araştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Seksen adet mandibular premolar diş seçildi ve 8 gruba dağıtıldı (n=10): 4 dk SAF (G1), 4 dk SAF + %17’lik etilendiamintetraasetik asit (EDTA) (G2), 4 dk SAF + %10’luk sitrik asit (SA) (G3), 4 dk SAF + %1’lik perasetik asit (PAA) (G4), 6 dk SAF (G5), 6 dk SAF + %17’lik EDTA (G6), 6 dk SAF + %10’luk SA (G7), 6 dk SAF + %1’lik PAA (G8). Kök kanalları güta-perka ve AH Plus kanal patı kullanılarak dolduruldu ve dişler 1,0 mm kalınlıklı kök kesitleri kullanılarak push out incelemesi için hazırlandı. Yükleme işlemi bir üniversal test cihazı kullanılarak 0,5 mm/dk hızında gerçekleştirildi ve istatistiksel yorumlamalar yapıldı (α=0,05). Bulgular: Farklı şelasyon ajanları kök kanal dolgusunun push-out bağlanma dayanımını anlamlı olarak etkilerken (p0,05). Köklerin apikal ve orta üçlülerinde gruplar arasında anlamlı farklılık yoktu (p>0,05). Koronal üçlülerde, G6 ve G8, G1 ve G5’ten anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bağlanma dayanımları gösterdi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, T., ŞENER, İ. (2022). The Effects of Two Different SelfAdjusting File Working Times and Three Different Chelating Agents on the Root Canal Filling Bond Strength. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 233–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/579059

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spangberg LS. A prognostic model for assessment of the outcome of endodontic treatment: Effect of biologic and diagnostic variables. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 913: 342-52.
  2. Kuruvilla A, Jaganath BM, Krishnegowda SC, Ramachandra PK, Johns DA, Abraham A. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using edta, etidronic acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18: 247-51.
  3. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 658-66. Elnaghy AM. Effect of QMix irrigant on bond strength of glass fibre posts to root dentine. Int Endod J 2014; 47: 280-9.
  4. Taneja S, Kumari M, Anand S. Effect of QMix, peracetic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on calcium loss and microhardness of root dentine. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17: 155-8.
  5. Paque F, Ganahl D, Peters OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2009; 35: 1056-9.
  6. Versiani MA, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Flat-oval root canal preparation with self-adjusting file instrument: a microcomputed tomography study. J Endod 2011; 37: 1002-7.
  7. Robinson JP, Lumley PJ, Cooper PR, Grover LM, Walmsley AD. Reciprocating root canal technique induces greater debris accumulation than a continuous rotary technique as assessed by 3-dimensional micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2013; 39: 1067-70. Metzger Z. From fles to SAF: 3D endodontic treatment is possible at last. Alpha Omegan 2011; 104: 36-44.
  8. Hof R, Perevalov V, Eltanani M, Zary R, Metzger Z. The selfadjusting file (SAF). Part 2: mechanical analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 691-6.
  9. Pereira RD, Brito-Junior M, Leoni GB, Estrela C, de Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of bond strength in single-cone fillings of canals with different cross-sections. Int Endod J 2017; 50: 177-83.
  10. De-Deus G, Souza EM, Barino B, Maia J, Zamolyi RQ, Reis C, et al. The self-adjusting file optimizes debridement quality in ovalshaped root canals. J Endod 2011; 37: 701-5.
  11. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paque F, Hulsmann M. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010; 36: 697-702.
  12. Paque F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M. Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans. J Endod 2009