SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Different In-Canal Environments On theAccuracy of Apex Locaters

Farklı Kanal İçi Ortamların Apeks Bulucuların DoğruluğuÜzerine Etkisi

Tuğrul ASLAN
Burak SAĞSEN
Asena OKUR
Pages
859–867
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to summarize theeffects of different in-canal environments on the measurementaccuracy of electronic apex locaters, in light of this literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For a successful endodontic treatment, precise determination ofthe actual canal length is one of the top priorities for properpreparation and effective disinfection of the root canal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Electronicapex locaters (EAL) have been brought to the agenda due toproblems in root canal length detection by radiographic method.Irrigation solutions used during chemomechanical preparation,root canal content and change in root canal anatomy due topathological factors have been considered as factors affectingthe accuracy of measurements made by EALs and many studieshave been done.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to summarize theeffects of different in-canal environments on the measurementaccuracy of electronic apex locaters, in light of this literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

For a successful endodontic treatment, precise determination ofthe actual canal length is one of the top priorities for properpreparation and effective disinfection of the root canal. Electronicapex locaters (EAL) have been brought to the agenda due toproblems in root canal length detection by radiographic method.Irrigation solutions used during chemomechanical preparation,root canal content and change in root canal anatomy due topathological factors have been considered as factors affectingthe accuracy of measurements made by EALs and many studieshave been done. The aim of this review is to summarize theeffects of different in-canal environments on the measurementaccuracy of electronic apex locaters, in light of this literature.

Özet

Başarlı bir endodontik tedavi için gerçek kanal uzunluğunun tamolarak belirlenmesi, kök kanalının uygun bir şekildeşekillendirilmesini ve etkili dezenfeksiyonu için en önceliklişartlardan biridir. Radyografik yöntemle çalışma boyutu tespitindekiproblemler nedeniyle elektronik apeks bulucular (EAB) gündemegelmiştir. Kemo-mekanik şekillendirme esnasında kullanılan yıkamasolüsyonları, kök kanal içeriği ve patolojik faktörlerden kaynaklanankök kanal anatomisindeki değişim EAB'ler tarafından yapılanölçümlerin doğruluğunu etkileyen faktörler olarak düşünülmüş vebununla ilgili pek çok çalışma yapılmıştır. Bu derlemenin hedefi, buliteratür bilgisi ışığında, farklı kanal içi ortamların elektronik apeksbulucuların ölçüm hassasiyetine etkilerinin özetlenmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, T., SAĞSEN, B., OKUR, A. (2022). The Effect of Different In-Canal Environments On theAccuracy of Apex Locaters. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 859–867. https://ajindex.com/articles/591381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J. 1998; 31(6): 394- 409
  2. Kaval ME, Dönmez H. Elektronik Apeks Bulucular. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg. 2013; 34(2): 73-8 3. Tınaz C. Kanal tedavisinde çalışma boyutu. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;18(1):31-7
  3. Welk AR, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod. 2003; 29(8): 497-500
  4. Gordon MP, Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(7): 425-37
  5. Khadse A, Shenoi P, Kokane V, Khode R, Sonarkar S. Electronic Apex Locators- An overview. IJCE. 2017; 2(2): 35-40
  6. Dimitrov S, Roshkev D. Sixth generation adaptive apex locator. Journal of IMAB-Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers). 2009; 15(2009): 75-8
  7. ŞEN ÖG. Endodontide Çalışma Boyunun Doğruluğunu Araştırmada Kullanılan Yöntemler. Türkiye Klinikleri Endodonti-Özel Konular. 2017;3(1):38-41
  8. Nekoofar M, Ghandi M, Hayes S, Dummer P. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):595-609. 10.Özsezer E, İnan U, Aydın U. In vivo evaluation of ProPex electronic apex locator. J Endod. 2007; 33(8): 974-7. 11.Wesselink P, Bergenholtz G. Treatment of the necrotic pulp. PROBAB ENG INFORM SCI.2003:156-175 12.Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. St. Louis (MO): Mosby. Elsevier; 2006. 13.Khursheed I, Bansal R, Bansal T, Singh HP, Yadav M, Reddy KJ. A comparative evaluation of working length with digital radiography and third generation apex locator (ProPex) in the presence of various intracanal irrigants: An in vivo/ex vivo study. Dent Res J. 2014; 11(1): 56 14.Swapna DV, Krishna A, Patil AC, Rashmi K, Pai VS, Ranjini MA. Comparison of third generation versus fourth generation electronic apex locators in detecting apical constriction: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(4): 288-91. 15.Stoll R, Urban‐Klein B, Roggendorf M, Jablonski‐ Momeni A, Strauch K, Frankenberger R. Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen. Int Endod J. 2010; 43(9): 808-17. 16.Vasconcelos BCd, Araújo RBR, Luna-Cruz SM, Duarte MAH, Fernandes CAdO. In vivo accuracy of two electronic foramen locators based on different operation systems. Braz Dent J. 2014; 25(1): 12-6. 17.Duran‐Sindreu F, Gomes S, Stöber E, Mercadé M, Jané L, Roig M. In vivo evaluation of the iPex and Root ZX electro