SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Micro-shear Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Universal Adhesives

Farklı Üniversal Adezivlerle Tamir Edilen Yaşlandırılmış Kompozit Rezinin Mikro-Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımı

Gülbike DEMİREL
Pages
7–12
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study evaluated the effect of two different universal adhesives on the repair bond strength of aged resin composite.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Forty-four composite resin disks were prepared (5 mm x 3 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of two different universal adhesives on the repair bond strength of aged resin composite. Materials and Methods: Forty-four composite resin disks were prepared (5 mm x 3 mm). The composite disks randomly assigned into four groups after aging. Specimens were repaired with resin composite using four different repair procedure; Porcelain primer + Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, Single Bond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, then they were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma iki farklı üniversal adeziv sistemin yaşlandırılmış rezin kompozitlerin tamir bağlanma dayanımı üzerindeki etkileri incelemektedir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kırk dört adet kompozit disk hazırlanmıştır (5 mm x 3 mm). Kompozit disklerin yaşlandırılmasının ardından (ısıl-döngü 10.000), rastgele dört gruba ayrılmıştır. Örnekler rezin kompozit ile dört farklı tamir prosedürü izlenerek tamir edilmiştir: Porselen primer + Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, Single Bond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, ardından mikro-makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi uygulanmıştır. Veriler ANOVA ve Tukey’s HSD kullanılarak analiz edilmişlerdir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, G. (2022). Micro-shear Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Universal Adhesives. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 7–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/579048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508
  2. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Shen C. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 273-8
  3. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 1-12
  4. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 358-60. 5. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 2012; 40: 513-21
  5. Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral Repair of Direct and Indirect Restorations: Procedures and Guidelines. Oper Dent 2016; 41: S68-S78
  6. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Van Meerbeek, Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 2011; 27: 701-9
  7. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater 2011; 27: e20-7
  8. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 299-308
  9. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 282-92
  10. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 Suppl 1: 31-44
  11. Üstün Ö, Büyükhatipoğlu IK, Seçilmiş A. Shear Bond Strength of Repair Systems to New CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 748-54
  12. Al-Thagafi R, Al-Zordk W, Saker S. Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols on Reparability of CAD/CAM Zirconiareinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 135- 41
  13. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 161-7
  14. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 44