SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 20 Issue: 1

Micro-shear Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Universal Adhesives

Gülbike Demirel(ANKARA UNIVERSITY)
Gürkan Gür(ANKARA UNIVERSITY)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Repair of composite restorations with universal adhesives cannot suggest without additional silane application.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study evaluated the effect of two different universal adhesives on the repair bond strength of aged resin composite.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Forty-four composite resin disks were prepared (5 mm x 3 mm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Repair of composite restorations with universal adhesives cannot suggest without additional silane application.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Universal adhesives · composite repair · microshear bond strength

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of two different universal adhesives on the repair bond strength of aged resin composite. Materials and Methods: Forty-four composite resin disks were prepared (5 mm x 3 mm). The composite disks randomly assigned into four groups after aging. Specimens were repaired with resin composite using four different repair procedure; Porcelain primer + Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, Single Bond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, then they were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (p<0.05). Results: Additional silane treatment significantly affected the repair bond strengths (p<0.05). No statistical difference was found in repaired groups with universal adhesives. One-step self-etch adhesive showed lower bond repair strength values in aged composite repair (p<0.05). Conclusion: Repair of composite restorations with universal adhesives cannot suggest without additional silane application.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirel, G., Gür, G. (2019). Micro-shear Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Universal Adhesives. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 20 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2018.43760

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
  2. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Shen C. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 273-8.
  3. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry--a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 1-12.
  4. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 358-60.
  5. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 2012; 40: 513-21.
  6. Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral Repair of Direct and Indirect Restorations: Procedures and Guidelines. Oper Dent 2016; 41: S68-S78.
  7. Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Van Meerbeek, Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 2011; 27: 701-9.
  8. Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater 2011; 27: e20-7.
  9. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 299-308.
  10. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 282-92.
  11. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 Suppl 1: 31-44.
  12. Üstün Ö, Büyükhatipoğlu IK, Seçilmiş A. Shear Bond Strength of Repair Systems to New CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Prosthodont 2018; 27: 748-54.
  13. Al-Thagafi R, Al-Zordk W, Saker S. Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols on Reparability of CAD/CAM Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2016; 18: 135-41.
  14. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015; 34: 161-7.
  15. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-51.
  16. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1276-82.
  17. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26: 685-94.
  18. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite–composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 2003; 31: 521-5.
  19. Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008; 36: 969-76.
  20. Hannig C, Laubach S, Hahn P, Attin T. Shear bond strength of repaired adhesive filling materials using different repair procedures. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 35-40.
  21. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 122-6.
  22. Lucena-Martín C, González-López S, Navajas-Rodríguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 481-8.
  23. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 442-51.
  24. Liu Y, Liu X, Xu X, Cen Y. Chemical injuries caused by hydrofluoric acid leak. Burns 2016; 42: 705-6.
  25. Loomans BA, Mine A, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, et al. Van Meerbeek, Hydrofluoric acid on dentin should be avoided. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 643-9.
  26. Szep S, Gerhardt T, Gockel HW, Ruppel M, Metzeltin D, Heidemann D. In vitro dentinal surface reaction of 9.5% buffered hydrofluoric acid in repair of ceramic restorations: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 668-74.
  27. Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 200-2.
  28. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 155-64.
  29. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.