SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Water Sorption-solubility and Surface Roughness of Different Bulk Fill Composite Resins

Farklı Bulk Fill Kompozitlerin Su Emilimi, Çözünürlük ve Yüzey Pürüzlülüklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Nihan GÖNÜLO
Emine ŞEN TUNÇ
Sezin ÖZER
Kemal YILDIZLI
Pages
28–33
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: WS and SO showed significant, positive correlations (r=0.612; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate and compare the water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and surface roughness (SR) of four bulk fill resin-based composites (RBCs), a conventional flowable RBC and a conventional hybrid RBC.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Disc-shaped specimens of 3 low-viscosity bulk fill RBCs (SureFil SDR flow, X-tra base, Filtek Bulk Fill flow), 1 high-viscosity bulk fill RBC (Tetric EvoCream Bulk Fill), 1 conventional low-viscosity flowable RBC (Filtek Ultimate flow) and 1 conventional hybrid RBC (Filtek Z250) (n=10) were prepared and immersed in distilled water for 28 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: WS and SO showed significant, positive correlations (r=0.612; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate and compare the water sorption (WS), solubility (SO) and surface roughness (SR) of four bulk fill resin-based composites (RBCs), a conventional flowable RBC and a conventional hybrid RBC. Materials and Methods: Disc-shaped specimens of 3 low-viscosity bulk fill RBCs (SureFil SDR flow, X-tra base, Filtek Bulk Fill flow), 1 high-viscosity bulk fill RBC (Tetric EvoCream Bulk Fill), 1 conventional low-viscosity flowable RBC (Filtek Ultimate flow) and 1 conventional hybrid RBC (Filtek Z250) (n=10) were prepared and immersed in distilled water for 28 days. Upon removal, specimens were weighed using an electronic scale to determine WS and SO based on weight gain/loss, and surface profilometry was performed to determine SR. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc tests (p=0.05). Results: WS and SO showed significant, positive correlations (r=0.612; p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı dört farklı bulk fill kompozit rezin ile bir adet geleneksel akışkan kompozit ve bir adet geleneksel hibrit kompozitin su emilimi, çözünürlük ve yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerlerini karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Üç adet düşük viskoziteli bulk fill kompozit (SureFil SDR flow, X-tra base, Filtek Bulk Fill flow), bir adet yüksek viskoziteli bulk fill kompozit (Tetric EvoCream Bulk Fill), bir adet geleneksel düşük viskoziteli akışkan kompozit (Filtek Ultimate flow) ve bir adet geleneksel hibrit kompozit (Filtek Z250) kullanılarak disk şeklinde örnekler hazırlanıp distile suda 28 gün bekletilmiştir (n=10). Örnekler elektronik bir terazide tartılarak kütle kazanım ve kayıp değerlerine göre su emilimi ve çözünürlük değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Daha sonra yüzey pürüzlülüğü ölçümü için profilometre cihazı kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey post-hoc testleri ile analiz edilmiştir (p=0,05). Bulgular: Su emilimi ve çözünürlük değerleri arasında pozitif korelasyon tespit edilmiştir (r=0,612; p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLO, N., TUNÇ, E. Ş., ÖZER, S., YILDIZLI, K. (2022). Evaluation of Water Sorption-solubility and Surface Roughness of Different Bulk Fill Composite Resins. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 28–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/579040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 227-35
  2. Dentsply (2011) SDR Scientific Compendium. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: http://www.dentsply.de/bausteine. net/f/8883/SCSDRDeTrey110815E.pdf?fd=2
  3. Ivoclar Vivadent (2013) Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill Scientific Documentation. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from: http:// www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorativematerials/tetric-evoceram-bulk fill
  4. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-25
  5. VOCO GmbH (2013) x-tra base. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from http://www.voco.com/en/product/x-tra_base/index.html. 6. 3M ESPE (2012) Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative Technical Product Profile. Retrieved online August 1, 2016 from:http:// multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/792321O/filtek-bulk fillflowable-restorative-technical-product-profile.pdf
  6. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1692-9
  7. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69
  8. Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylatebased dental resins. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 655-65
  9. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 801-9
  10. Abbas G, Fleming GJP, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003; 31: 437-44
  11. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 9-20
  12. Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on the degree of conversion of bulk fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 1207-13
  13. Han SH, Sadr A, Tagami J, Park SH. Internal adaptation of resin composites at two configurations: Influence of polymerization shrinkage and stress. Dent Mate