SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

THE NEXUS BETWEEN EMBODIED TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND PRODUCTIVITY: KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION

ŞEKİLLENMİŞ TEKNOLOJİ YAYILIMI İLE VERİMLİLİK ARASINDAKİ BAĞLANTI: BİLGİ ÜRETİMİ

Cemil Faruk DURMAZ
Pages
20–35
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We observe that labor productivity soars with direct and indirect utilization of technology transfer via knowledge production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines embodied technology flows through intermediate good transactions between industries in various economies and focuses on the ambiguity about their link to innovation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Simultaneous equations results support the system we introduce, indicating that both channels of embodied technology spillovers are significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We observe that labor productivity soars with direct and indirect utilization of technology transfer via knowledge production.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teknoloji Yayılımı · Bilgi Üretimi · Eşzamanlı Denklemler

Abstract

This study examines embodied technology flows through intermediate good transactions between industries in various economies and focuses on the ambiguity about their link to innovation. The model consists of two equations measuring labor productivity and knowledge production, and knowledge production is measured as the explanatory variable of productivity. We compare direct effect of embodied research transfer on labor productivity through intermediate good transactions between industries and its indirect effect via knowledge creation. We use input-output tables as a proximity mechanism for research capital and utilize production function approach. Simultaneous equations results support the system we introduce, indicating that both channels of embodied technology spillovers are significant. We observe that labor productivity soars with direct and indirect utilization of technology transfer via knowledge production.

Özet

Bu çalışma, çeşitli ekonomilerde sektörler arası ara mal işlemleri yoluyla şekillenmiş teknoloji akışlarını incelemekte ve bunların inovasyonla olan bağlantılarına ilişkin belirsizliğe odaklanmaktadır. Şekillenmiş araştırma transferi’nin endüstriler arasındaki ara mal işlemleri yoluyla emek verimliliği üzerindeki doğrudan etkisi ile bilgi yaratma yoluyla dolaylı etkisini karşılaştırıyoruz. Araştırma sermayesi için bir ağırlıklandırma yöntemi olarak girdi-çıktı tablolarını ve çoklu denklem GMM yaklaşımını kullanıyoruz. Model, emek verimliliğini ve bilgi üretimini ölçen iki denklemden oluşmakta, bilgi üretimi verimliliğin açıklayıcı değiskeni olarak ölçülmektedir. Eşzamanlı denklem sonuçlarımız, şekillenmiş teknoloji yayılmalarının her iki kanalının da anlamlı olduğunu göstererek, tanıttığımız sistemi desteklemektedir. Bilgi üretimi yoluyla teknoloji transferinin doğrudan ve dolaylı kullanımı aracılığıyla emek verimliliğinin arttığını gözlemliyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMAZ, C. F. (2022). THE NEXUS BETWEEN EMBODIED TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND PRODUCTIVITY: KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 20–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/578606

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aldieri, L. (2013). Knowledge technological proximity: evidence from US and European patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(8), 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438.599.2013.788838
  2. Aldieri, L., Sena, V., & Vinci, C. (2018). Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for US, Europe and Japan. International Journal of Production Economics, 198, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpe.2018.01.015 Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., & van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81(4), 1347-1393. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9466
  3. Gonçalves, E., & B. Ferreira Neto, A. (2016). Intersectoral flows of technological knowledge in emerging countries: An input-output analysis. CEPAL review. https://ideas.repec.org/s/ecr/col070.html
  4. Gonçalves, E., Perobelli, F., & Araújo, I. (2017). Estimating intersectoral technology spillovers for Brazil. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1377-1406. https://ideas.repec.org/s/kap/jtecht.html
  5. Griliches, Z. (1976). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
  6. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298044
  7. Hu, A. G., & Jaffe, A. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849-880.
  8. Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value. American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001. http://www.nber.org/papers/w1815
  9. Los, B., & Verspagen, B. (2000). R&D spillovers and productivity: Evidence from U.S. manufacturing microdata. Empirical Economics, 25, 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001.810.050007 Neuhäusler, P., Frietsch, R., & Kroll, H. (2019). Probabilistic concordance schemes for the re-assignment of patents to economic sectors and scientific publications to technology fields. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 60. Oikawa, K. (2017). Inter-firm technological proximity and knowledge spillovers. Public Policy Review, 13(3). https://ideas.repec.org/s/tcr/wpaper.html
  10. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. https://www. jstor.org/stable/2937632 Terleckyj, N. (1980). Effects of