Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE CAPITAL, SPILLOVER EFFECTS AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY

Pages
293–309
Publication Date
2016-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, capital goods imports do not cause a knowledgetransfer from G7 economies to countries with relatively and significantly lower level of productivity.The paper is expected to contribute the literature by using labor productivity instead of total factorproductivity when the effects of externalities are investigated in samples with different set of countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In growth literature the part and the variations of the growth rates unexplained by the changes in theamount of labor and capital, named as Solow Residual, has been continuing to be one of the mainconcerns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Spillover effects through capital goods imports and domestic R&Dcapital stock on labor productivity are empirically investigated in this study for 23 countries between2002 and 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, capital goods imports do not cause a knowledgetransfer from G7 economies to countries with relatively and significantly lower level of productivity.The paper is expected to contribute the literature by using labor productivity instead of total factorproductivity when the effects of externalities are investigated in samples with different set of countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Total Factor Productivity · Labor Productivity · R&D Capital

Özet

In growth literature the part and the variations of the growth rates unexplained by the changes in theamount of labor and capital, named as Solow Residual, has been continuing to be one of the mainconcerns. Technological advances and improvements in human capital have been the main candidatesin investigating the sources of the unexplained part of the growth phenomenon. However the channelsthrough which technology is transferred among countries still need more investigation. Most part ofthe literature is focused on the Total Factor Productivity (TFP), the main determinants of which areconsidered to be the research and development (R & D) and human capital. More recently spillovereffects as the way to transfer the technology through the import of capital and Foreign Direct Investment(FDI) have become the central theme. Spillover effects through capital goods imports and domestic R&Dcapital stock on labor productivity are empirically investigated in this study for 23 countries between2002 and 2011. Results of panel data analysis indicated that technology transfer is significant andpositive for a large and heterogeneous sample. However, capital goods imports do not cause a knowledgetransfer from G7 economies to countries with relatively and significantly lower level of productivity.The paper is expected to contribute the literature by using labor productivity instead of total factorproductivity when the effects of externalities are investigated in samples with different set of countries.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜALP, M. N., DURMAZ, C. F. (2016). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE CAPITAL, SPILLOVER EFFECTS AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 293–309. https://ajindex.com/articles/6419

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. XU Bin, J. W. Capital Goods Trade and R&D Spillovers in the OECD. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1258-1274, 1999.
  2. VAN POTTELSBERGHE Bruno, F. L., Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology Across Borders? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 490-497, 2001.
  3. HELPMAN E., Coe, D. T. & Hoffmaister, W., International R&D Spillovers and Institutions. NBER Working Paper Series, 14069, 2008
  4. HELPMAN E., David T. Coe,., International R&D Spillovers. Working Paper International Bureau of Economic Research, 1993
  5. HELPMAN E., David T. Coe, International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, 859 – 887, 1995
  6. HELPMAN E., David T. Coe, North-South R&D Spillovers. The Economic Journal, 134-149, 1997
  7. HELPMAN E., David T. Coe, International R&D Spillovers and Institutions. IMF Working Paper, 2008
  8. HELPMAN E., Gene M. GROSSMAN, Quality Ladder in the Theory of Growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 43-61, 1991
  9. HELPMAN E., G. M., Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 43-61, 1991
  10. DRISCOLL J., A. C., Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 549-560, 1998
  11. BITZER Jürgen, M. K., Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology Across Borders? Economic Letters 100, 355-358, 2008
  12. BECK. N., J. K., Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifiying and Estimating Time Series Cross Section Models. Poltical Analysis 6, 1-36, 1996
  13. PARKS, R. W., Efficient Estimation of a System of Regression Equation When Distrubance are Both Serially and Contemporaneously Correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 500-509, 1966
  14. ROMER, P. M., Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1002-1037, 1986
  15. ROMER, P. M., Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990
  16. SOLOW, R. M., A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65-94, 1956