Journals / Marmara Medical Journal / 2002 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Cochlear implant results in prelingual adults

Pages
175–179
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to decide precisely about the benefits one can get from the implant, it may be useful to evaluate the patient in his/her daily activities, and his/her degree of incorporation in social life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the speech perception and speech understanding of the prelingually deafened cochlear implant users.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study consisted of nine prelingually deafened adults implanted with Nucleus 24 M cochlear implant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to decide precisely about the benefits one can get from the implant, it may be useful to evaluate the patient in his/her daily activities, and his/her degree of incorporation in social life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the speech perception and speech understanding of the prelingually deafened cochlear implant users. Methods: The study consisted of nine prelingually deafened adults implanted with Nucleus 24 M cochlear implant. Auditory performance was measured using a battery of closed and open set speech tests. Results: Although no closed set and open set speech recognition was possible before implantation, a significant improvement over time was found at the closed set speech tests for all the patients. Three patients demonstrated some improvement of open set speech performance. All except one reported subjective benefits and satisfaction from the implantation. Conclusion: Speech recognition evaluation is important but it is only one aspect in cochlear implant success criteria. In order to decide precisely about the benefits one can get from the implant, it may be useful to evaluate the patient in his/her daily activities, and his/her degree of incorporation in social life.

🔖

Cite This Article

DERİNSU, U., AKDAŞ, F., CİPRUT, A. (2022). Cochlear implant results in prelingual adults. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/578436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Qantz BJ, Tye Murray Pi, Tyler RS. Word recognition performance with single-channel and multichannel cochlear implants.Am J Otol 1989; 10:91-94
  2. Skinner M, holden L, Holden T, et al. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the wearable speech processor ( WSPHI) and mini speech processor ( MSP ) of the nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.Ear Hear 1991; 12:3-22
  3. Cohen PİL, Waltzman SB,Roland TJ,et al. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.Am J Otol 1997; 18:462- 465
  4. Clark QM, Busby PA, Roberts S A, et al. Preliminary results for the cochlear corporation multielectrode intracochlear electrode in six prelinguaiiy deaf patients. Am J Otol 1987 -,8:234-239
  5. Dawson PW, Blamy PJ, Rowland LC,et al. Cochlear implants in children,adolescents and prelinguistically deafened adults-.speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 1992,-35:401-417
  6. Waltzman SB, Cohen FİL, Shapiro WH. Use of multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitaiiy and prelinguaiiy deaf population. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:395-399
  7. Zwalon TA, riileny PR, Telian SA. Self report of cochlear implant use and satisfaction by prelinguaiiy deafened adults. Ear Hear 1996; 17:198-210
  8. Eryauf-Bertschy H,Tyler RS, Kelsay DMR, et al.Cochlear implant use by prelinguaiiy deafened children-.the influences of age at implant and lenght of device use 199?',-40:183-199
  9. Qence Z. The standardization of the speech tests for cochlear implant patients in Marmara University Medical School, Department of Audiology,2001, unpublished thesis.