Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

YAŞLANMANIN TEMPORAL ÇÖZÜNÜRLÜK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

EFFECT OF AGING ON TEMPORAL RESOLUTION

Pages
178–186
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The present study showed that temporal resolution decreases with aging and that this reduction in temporal resolution is only one of the underlying reasons of speech recognition difficulties in elderly people and it is concluded that the gaps-in-noise test is a fast and appropriate test for assessing temporal resolution in both young and elderly individuals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ntroduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in temporal resolution with aging and the effects of these age-related changes on speech recognition performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: 30 young adults with normal-hearing (aged 18 to 30 years) and 25 elderly adults with normal-hearing (aged 60 to 80 years), a total of 55 participants, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The present study showed that temporal resolution decreases with aging and that this reduction in temporal resolution is only one of the underlying reasons of speech recognition difficulties in elderly people and it is concluded that the gaps-in-noise test is a fast and appropriate test for assessing temporal resolution in both young and elderly individuals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ntroduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the changes in temporal resolution with aging and the effects of these age-related changes on speech recognition performance. Materials and Method: 30 young adults with normal-hearing (aged 18 to 30 years) and 25 elderly adults with normal-hearing (aged 60 to 80 years), a total of 55 participants, were included in the study. For each subject, Gaps in Noise Test, Acceptable Noise Level test and Speech Recognition Tests were carried out. Results: No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of Most Comfortable Level, Background Noise Level and Acceptable Noise Level while there were significant differences in terms of Gaps in Noise threshold, Total Percentage Score and Speech Recognition Scores (p=0.0001). The elderly group had a significantly higher Gaps in Noise threshold and lower Total Percentage Score compared to the younger group. Also, the mean score of speech recognition in the elderly group under all conditions was significantly lower than the younger group (p=0.0001). Conclusion: The present study showed that temporal resolution decreases with aging and that this reduction in temporal resolution is only one of the underlying reasons of speech recognition difficulties in elderly people and it is concluded that the gaps-in-noise test is a fast and appropriate test for assessing temporal resolution in both young and elderly individuals

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmada yaşlanmayla birlikte temporal çözünürlükte meydana gelen değişiklikler ve bu değişikliklerin konuşmayı ayırt etme performansı üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya normal işiten 18-30 yaşları arası 30 genç yetişkin ve 60-80 yaşları arası 25 yaşlı yetişkin olmak üzere toplam 55 katılımcı dahil edilmiş, her birine Gürültüde Boşluk Tanıma Testi, Kabul Edilebilir Gürültü Seviyesi Testi ve Konuşma Testleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında En Rahat Dinleme Seviyesi, Arka Plan Gürültü Seviyesi ve Kabul Edilebilir Gürültü Seviyesi bakımından anlamlı fark elde edilmezken; Gürültüde Boşluk Tanıma eşiği, Doğru Boşluk Tanıma oranı ve konuşmayı ayırt etme puanları bakımından anlamlı farklar elde edilmiştir (p=0.0001). Yaşlı grupta Gürültüde Boşluk Tanıma eşiği ortalaması genç gruba göre yüksek, Doğru Boşluk Tanıma oranı ortalaması ise istatistiksel olarak düşük elde edilmiştir (p=0.0001). Tüm dinleme koşullarında konuşmayı ayırt etme puanı ortalamaları yaşlı grupta genç gruba göre istatistiksel olarak düşük elde edilmiştir (p=0.0001). Sonuç: Çalışma sonunda yaşlanma ile beraber işitsel temporal çözünürlüğün azaldığı, bu azalmaların yaşlılardaki konuşmayı ayırt etme güçlüklerinin altında yatan nedenlerden sadece biri olduğu ve gürültüde boşluk tanıma testinin genç ve yaşlı bireylerde temporal çözünürlüğü değerlendirilmek üzere kullanılabilir hızlı ve uygun bir test olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CESUR, S., DERİNSU, E. U. (2022). YAŞLANMANIN TEMPORAL ÇÖZÜNÜRLÜK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 178–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/623741

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin: The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998;148:879–86. (PMID:9801018)
  2. Pichora-Fuller MK, Souza PE. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int J Audiol 2003;42(2):2S11-6. (PMID:12918623)
  3. Bahng J, Lee J. Hearing Thresholds for a geriatric population composed of Korean males and females. Journal of Audiology & Otology 2015;19(2):91-6. (PMID:26413575)
  4. Arvin B, Prepageran N, Raman R. “High frequency presbycusis”-is there an earlier onset? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;65(3):480- 4. (PMID:24427701
  5. Divenyi PL, Stark PB, Haupt KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005;118(2):1089-100. (PMID:16158663)
  6. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res and Dev 2005;42(4):9-24. (PMID:16470462)
  7. Vermeire K, Knoop A, Boel C, Auwers S, et al. Speech recognition in noise by younger and older adults: effects of age, hearing loss, and temporal resolution. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016;125(4):297-302. (PMID:26466858)
  8. Harris KC, Mills JH, Dubno JR. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hear Res 2007;228(1-2):58-68. (PMID:17344001)
  9. Van Rooıj JC, Polmp R. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. J,Acoust Soc Am 1990;88(6):2611-24. (PMID:2283434)
  10. Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36(6):1276- 85. (PMID:8114494)
  11. Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ, Yeni-Komshian GH. Auditory temporal processing and aging: implications for speech understanding of older people. Audiol Res 2011;1(1):e4. (PMID:26557313)
  12. Roberts RA, Lister JJ. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: broadband stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47(5):965-78. (PMID:15603455)
  13. Musiek FE, Bellis TJ, Chermak GD. Nonmodularity of the central auditory nervous system: implications for (central) auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol 2005;14(2):128-38; 143-50. (PMID:16489870)
  14. Durankaya SM, Şerbetçioğlu B, Dalkılıç G, et al. Development of a Turkish monosyllabic word recognition test for