SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kutadgubilig: Felsefe Bilim Araştırmaları / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23

Aristotle proof by redictio ad absurdum

Aristoteles'te abese irca yöntemiyle ispatlama

Murat KELİKLİ
Pages
91–105
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By redictio ad absurdum, all forms of Aristotle s method proved inthe first figure can be reduced to the perfect forms

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Redictio ad absurdum is an important part of Aristotle s syllogistic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It isconnected with direct proof and they are complementary methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By redictio ad absurdum, all forms of Aristotle s method proved inthe first figure can be reduced to the perfect forms
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Redictio ad absurdum is an important part of Aristotle s syllogistic. It isconnected with direct proof and they are complementary methods. All moods ofAristotle are provable by direct methods and redictio ad absurdum. In this paper,I have studied on the bases and principles of redictio ad absurdums, I showedhow to prove by redictio ad absurdum, and how to prove Aristotle by redictio adabsurdum. By redictio ad absurdum, all forms of Aristotle s method proved inthe first figure can be reduced to the perfect forms

Özet

Abese irca yöntemi, Aristotelesin mantığında önemli bir yer tutar. Bu yöntem,doğrudan ispatlama ile bağlantılı ve birbirini tamamlayıcıdır. Aristotelesintüm formları doğrudan ve abese irca yöntemleri vasıtasıyla ispatlanabilir.Çalışmamızda abese irca yönteminin temelleri ve dayanakları incelenmişolup bu yöntem vasıtasıyla nasıl ispatlama yapılacağı gösterilmiştir. Ayrıca buformların ispatlamalarını Aristotelesin nasıl verdiği göstermiş ve Aristotelesintüm formlarının abese irca yöntemi vasıtasıyla birinci şekildeki mükemmelformlara indirgenebileceği ispat edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELİKLİ, M. (2022). Aristotle proof by redictio ad absurdum. Kutadgubilig: Felsefe Bilim Araştırmaları, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23, 91–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/576947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. stotle, The Complete Works of Aristotle, Ed. J. Barnes, Princeton University Press,
  2. Vol. I, Princeton, N.J., 1991
  3. Betti, Arianna, “Lukasiewicz and Lesniewski on Contradiction”, Reports on Philosophy, No.22, 2004, pp.247-271
  4. Cohen, Marc S., “Aristotle on the Principle of Non-Contradiction”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.16, No.3, 1986, pp. 359-370
  5. Lukasiewicz, Jan, “On the Principle of Contradiction of Aristotle”, Çev. Vernan Wedin, The Review of Metaphysics, Vol.24, No.3, 1971, pp.485-509
  6. Lukasiewicz, Jan, Aristotle’s Syllogistic, Oxford University Press, London, 1957
  7. McCall, Stor, Aristotle’s Modal Syllogisms, North-Holland Publishing, 1963
  8. Patterson, Richard, Aristotle’s Modal Logic Essence and Entailment in the Organon, Cambridge, 1995
  9. Patzig, Günther, Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism: A Logico-Philogical Study of Book A of the Prior Analytics, Çev. Jonathan Barnes, Springer, 2010
  10. Patzig, Günther, “Aristotle and Syllogisms from False Premisses”, Mind, Vol.28, No.270, 1959, pp.186-192
  11. Rasmussen, Douglas B., “Aristotle and the Defense of the Law of Contradiction”, The Personalist, Vol.54, No.2, 1973, pp. 149-161
  12. Rijen, Jeroen Van, Aspects of Aristotle’s Modal Logic of Modalities, Kluwer, 1986
  13. Rini, Adriane, Aristotle’s Modal Proofs, Springer, 2011
  14. Ural, Şafak, Temel Mantık, Çantay Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1995