Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6

Academicians' Career Capital and Career Satisfaction: The Mediation Effect of Research Productivity

Pages
1921–1945
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results reveal that career capital has significant effects on the research productivity of academicians and that research productivity has a mediator effect on the relationship between career capital and career satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The competitive advantages of knowledge-producing institutions are their wise, creative, enthusiastic, and excited academicians and their competences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Currently, questions come to the fore as to which variables affect the research performance of university-employed academicians, and what role does research performance have in the relationship of these variables with career satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results reveal that career capital has significant effects on the research productivity of academicians and that research productivity has a mediator effect on the relationship between career capital and career satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The competitive advantages of knowledge-producing institutions are their wise, creative, enthusiastic, and excited academicians and their competences. Currently, questions come to the fore as to which variables affect the research performance of university-employed academicians, and what role does research performance have in the relationship of these variables with career satisfaction. In answer to these questions, this study hypothesizes that career competences (capital) will positively affect academic productivity and career satisfaction, and that academic productivity will have a mediator effect on the relationship between career competencies and individual career satisfaction, using the groundwork of the competence-based career theory conceptualized as intelligent career by Arthur, Claman, and DeFillippi. With the aim of empirically testing these hypotheses, as well as hypotheses that establish the sub-dimensions of these research questions, two field studies (including one pre-study) have been carried out on academicians working for universities in Turkey. The results reveal that career capital has significant effects on the research productivity of academicians and that research productivity has a mediator effect on the relationship between career capital and career satisfaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞMUŞ, N., AYTEKİN, I., AKGÜN, A. E., ERDİL, O. (2022). Academicians' Career Capital and Career Satisfaction: The Mediation Effect of Research Productivity. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6, 1921–1945. https://ajindex.com/articles/576723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akkermans, J., Brenninkmeijer, V., Huibers, M., & Blonk, R. W. B. (2013). Competencies for the contemporary career: Development and preliminary validation of the career competencies questionnaire. Journal of Career Development, 40, 245-267.
  2. Arnold, J. (1990). Predictors of career commitment: A test of three theoretical models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 285-307.
  3. Arthur, M. B., Claman, P. H., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1995). Intelligent enterprise, intelligent careers. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 7-22.
  4. Arthur, M. B., Khapova, S. N., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Career success in a boundaryless career world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 177-202.
  5. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (1996). Introduction: The boundaryless career as a new employement principle. In The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational area (pp. 3-20).
  6. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  7. Aryee, S., & Tan, K. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of career commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 288-305.
  8. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122.
  9. Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In J. Schuster & D. Wheeler (Eds.), Enhancing faculty careers (pp. 20-40).
  10. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Ballout, H. I. (2007). Career success: The effects of human capital, person-environment fit and organizational support. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 741-765.
  11. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  12. Baruch, Y. (2004). Managing careers: Theory and practice. Harlow Essex, UK: FT-Prentice Hall, Pearson Education. Baruch, Y., & Hall, D. T. (2004). The academic career: A model for future careers in other sectors? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 241-262.
  13. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9-49.
  14. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  15. Blau, G. J. (1985). The measurement and prediction of career commitment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 277-288.
  16. Blau, G. J. (1999). Early-career job factors inf