Journals / Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi / 2022 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

Retrospective Analysis of Histopathological Results ofOral Mucosal Lesions

Oral Mukozal Lezyonlara Ait Histopatolojik Sonuçların Retrospektif Analizi

Pages
117–124
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean age of premalignant and malignant lesions was found to be significantly higher than the mean age of patients with benign lesions (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The first evaluation according to the morphological features of the oral mucosal lesion gives us important information in terms of diagnosis and follow-up, however, the accurate diagnosis can be made after histopathological examination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: The histopathological results of patients who underwent oral mucosal biopsies between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated according to the frequency of occurrence, localization, age and gender distribution of the diagnoses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean age of premalignant and malignant lesions was found to be significantly higher than the mean age of patients with benign lesions (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The first evaluation according to the morphological features of the oral mucosal lesion gives us important information in terms of diagnosis and follow-up, however, the accurate diagnosis can be made after histopathological examination. In this study, the histopathological diagnoses of patients who underwent biopsy for oral mucosal lesions were evaluated. Material and Methods: The histopathological results of patients who underwent oral mucosal biopsies between 2009 and 2016 were evaluated according to the frequency of occurrence, localization, age and gender distribution of the diagnoses. Lesions were also grouped according to their characteristics of being benign non-neoplastic, benign neoplastic, premalignant, and malignant, and data were analyzed within groups. Results: Of the 340 patients, 193 (56.8%) were female and 147 (43.2%) were male. When the histopathological diagnoses were evaluated according to the groups, 177 (52.1%) patients had benign non-neoplastic, 126 (37.1%) patients had benign neoplastic, 14 (4.1%) patients had premalignant, and 23 (6.8%) patients had malignant lesions. Most of the malignant lesions were squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age of premalignant and malignant lesions was found to be significantly higher than the mean age of patients with benign lesions (p

Özet

Amaç: Oral mukozal lezyonun morfolojik ozelliklerine go ̈ re ya- ̈ pılan ilk degerlendirme bize tan ̆ ı ve takip acı̧sından onemli bilgi ver- ̈ mektedir, bununla birlikte kesin tanı alınan biyopsi sonrasında yapılan histopatolojik inceleme sonucu konabilmektedir. Bu cal ̧ ısmada, oral mu- ̧ kozal lezyon nedeniyle biyopsi alınan hastaların histopatolojik tanıları degerlendirildi. ̆ Gerec ve Yo ̧ ntemler: ̈ 2009 ve 2016 yılları arasında oral mukozadan oral mukozal lezyon nedeniyle biyopsi alınan hastaların histopatoloji sonuclar ̧ ı tanıların gorü lme s ̈ ıklıgı̆na, lokalizasyonuna, yaş ve cinsiyet dagı̆lımlarına gore deg ̈ erlendirildi. Lezyonlar ayr ̆ ıca benign nonneoplazik, benign neoplazik, premalign ve malign lezyon olma ozelliklerine go ̈ re grupland ̈ ırılarak her grup icin veriler incelendi. ̧ Bulgular: Uc̈ yu ̧ z k ̈ ırk hastanın 193’u (%56,8) kad ̈ ın, 147’si (%43,2) erkekti. Histopatolojik tanılar gruplara göre değerlendirildiğinde 177 (%52,1) hastada benign nonneoplazik lezyon, 126 (%37,1) hastada benign neoplazik lezyon, 14 (%4,1) hastada premalign lezyon ve 23 (%6,8) hastada malign lezyon izlendi. Malign lezyonların buyü k c ̈ oģ unlug ̆ unu ̆ skuamoz hu ̈ creli karsinom olus ̈ turmaktayd ̧ ı. Premalign ve malign lezyonlarda yas ortalamas ̧ ı, benign lezyonlara sahip hastaların yas ortala- ̧ masına gore anlaml ̈ ı derecede yuksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, N., AKKOCA, Ö., ÜNLÜ, C. E. (2022). Retrospective Analysis of Histopathological Results ofOral Mucosal Lesions. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 117–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/576584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mumcu G, Cimilli H, Sur H, Hayran O, Atalay T. Prevalence and distribution of oral lesions: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. Oral Dis. 2005
  2. 11(2):81-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] 2. Lin HC, Corbet EF, Lo EC. Oral mucosal lesions in adult Chinese. J Dent Res. 2001
  3. 80(5):1486-90. [Crossref] [PubMed] 3. Kovac-Kovacic M, Skaleric U. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in a population in Ljubljana, Slovenia. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000
  4. 29(7):331- 5. [Crossref] [PubMed] 4. Oivio UM, Pesonen P, Ylipalosaari M, Kullaa A, Salo T. Prevalence of oral mucosal normal variations and lesions in a middle-aged population: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. BMC Oral Health. 2020
  5. 20(1):357. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 5. Reichart PA. Oral mucosal lesions in a representative cross-sectional study of aging Germans. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000
  6. 28(5):390-8. [Crossref] [PubMed] 6. Dundar N, Ilhan Kal B. Oral mucosal conditions and risk factors among elderly in a Turkish school of dentistry. Gerontology. 2007
  7. 53(3):165-72. [Crossref] [PubMed] 7. Błochowiak K, Farynowska J, Sokalski J, Wyganowska-Świątkowska M, Witmanowski H. Benign tumours and tumour-like lesions in the oral cavity: a retrospective analysis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2019
  8. 36(6):744- 51. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 8. Tam S, Fu S, Xu L, Krause KJ, Lairson DR, Miao H, et al. The epidemiology of oral human papillomavirus infection in healthy populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2018
  9. [Crossref] [PubMed] 9. Chaturvedi AK, Graubard BI, Broutian T, Pickard RKL, Tong ZY, Xiao W, et al. Effect of prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on oral hpv ınfections among young adults in the united states. J Clin Oncol. 2018
  10. 36(3):262-7. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 10. Torres-Domingo S, Bagan JV, Jiménez Y, Poveda R, Murillo J, Díaz JM, et al. Benign tumors of the oral mucosa: a study of 300 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008
  11. 13(3):E161-6. [PubMed] 11. Carneiro TE, Marinho SA, Verli FD, Mesquita AT, Lima NL, Miranda JL. Oral squamous papilloma: clinical, histologic and immunohistochemical analyses. J Oral Sci. 2009
  12. 51(3):367-72. [Crossref] [PubMed] 12. Hassan Saad R, Halawa SM, Zidan AM, Emara NM, Abdelghany OA. Malignant transformation of oral squamous cell papilloma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020
  13. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC] 13. Tsikopoulos A, Festas C, Fountarlis A, Sidiropoulou V, Chaitidis N, Symeonidis A, et al. Large irritation fibroma