Journals / Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Using circular stapler for treatment of grade III-IV hemorrhoid

III. ve IV. derece hemoroid tedavisinde sirküler stapler kullanımı

Pages
172–176
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The morbidity rate was low, the results are directly depend on experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate that whether stapled hemorrhoidopexy is less painful, has quick recovery to the social life, is safe and easy to perform, has less hospitalisation time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In this study between Jan 2004- Jan 2006, thirthyone patients were operated under spinal anesthesia with circular stapler.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The morbidity rate was low, the results are directly depend on experience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate that whether stapled hemorrhoidopexy is less painful, has quick recovery to the social life, is safe and easy to perform, has less hospitalisation time. METHODS: In this study between Jan 2004- Jan 2006, thirthyone patients were operated under spinal anesthesia with circular stapler. All of patients were male, mean age was 27 (20-46) years. The patients were evaluated in terms of functional recovery, hospitalization time, level of pain according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS: 1 to 10). RESULTS: Complaints of patients were; anal swelling 28, constipation 25, bleeding 23, pain around the anal region while sitting 18. Grade III hemorrhoid was confirmed in 17 patients, grade IV was confirmed in 14 patients. Mean operation time was 17,1 (16-45) minutes, mean hospitalization time was 47,2 (24-72) hours. Follow-up time was 2-24 months. Peroperatory bleeding was seen in 1 patient. Postoperative anal stricture was seen in 2 patients. Postoperative anal edema was seen in 1 patient. Postoperative urinary retantion was seen in 5 patients. Mean VAS score was 4 (1-7). Requiring analgesic was minimal level.CONCLUSION: Our results are verified obvious advantages of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in selected cases (especially for Type III hemorrhoids), allows the quick recovery, causes less pain during postoperative period, shortened the hospitalization time. The morbidity rate was low, the results are directly depend on experience.

Özet

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmada amacımız; stapler hemoroidopeksi yönteminin, daha az ağrılı, sosyal yaşantıya kısa sürede dönüşe izin veren, güvenli, uygulanması kolay ve hastanede kalış süresinin kısa olduğu bir yöntem olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. YÖNTEMLER: Bu çalışmada Ocak 2004- Ocak 2006 yılları arasında derece III-IV hemoroidi olan 31 hasta, spinal anestezi altında sirküler stapler ile ameliyat edildi. Ortalama yaşın 27 (20-46) olduğu tüm hastalar erkekti.Hastalar, fonksiyonel yaşama geri dönüş, hastanede kalma süreleri ve Vizüel Analog Skorlaması (VAS) ile ağrı düzeyleri yönünden değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Hastaların 28’inde anal şişlik, 25’inde konstipasyon, 23’ünde kanama, 18’inde ise otururken anal bölge çevresinde ağrı şikayeti mevcuttu. Hastaların 17’sinde III. derece ve 14’ünde IV. derece hemoroid saptandı. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 17,1 (16-45) dk, ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 47,2 (24-72) saat ve takip süresi 2-24 ay olarak bulundu. Peroperatuvar kanama 1 hastada, postoperatif anal striktür 2 hastada, anal ödem 1 hastada ve üriner retansiyon 5 hastada görüldü. Ortalama VAS skoru 4 (1-7) olarak tespit edildi. Analjezik ihtiyacı minimal düzeydeydi. SONUÇ: Sonuçlarımız, seçilmiş vakalarda (Özellikle III. derece hemoroidlerde) Stapler hemoroidopeksi yönteminin belirgin avantajları olduğunu doğrulamıştır; normal yaşantıya çabuk dönüş sağlamakta, ameliyat sonrası dönemde daha az ağrıya sebep olmakta ve hastanede kalış süresini kısaltmaktadır. Morbidite oranı düşük ve sonuçlar tecrübeyle doğrudan ilgilidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRBAŞ, S., ŞAHİN, A., SİNAN, H., COŞKUN, A. K., TOR, K. M., YILDIZ, R., ÖZER, M. T. (2022). Using circular stapler for treatment of grade III-IV hemorrhoid. Kolon ve Rektum Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 172–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/575393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Demirbafl S, Aktafl O, Ö¤ün ‹, Ya¤c› G. Hemorrhoidectomy by using circular stapler in grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. T Klin J Med Sci 2002;22:36-41
  2. Uras C, Baca B, Boler DE. Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy: Experience of a single center with 445 cases. World J Surg 2008;32:1783–88
  3. Pernice LM, Bartalucci B, Bencini L, et al. Early and late (Ten Years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:836-41
  4. Leventoglu S, Mentes BB, Ak›n M, Oguz M. Haemorrhoidectomy with electrocautery or ultrashears and stapled haemorrhoidopexy. ANZ J Surg 2008;78: 389–93
  5. Longo A. Pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;Dec 23-30:356;2189-90
  6. Corman ML, Gravie JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party- indications, contra-indications and tehnique. Colorectal Dis 2004;5:304-10
  7. Longo A. Stapled anopexy and stapled hemorrhoidectomy: two opposite concepts and procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:571-72
  8. Sutherland LM, Burchard AK, Matsuda K, Sweeney JL, Bokey EL, Childs PA, et al. A systematic review of stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:1395-06
  9. Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, et al. Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:360-69
  10. Sabanci U, Ogun I, Candemir G. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative foolowup. J Int Med Res 2007;35:917-21
  11. Jongen J, Eberstein A, Bock JU, et al. Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,223 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010;395:1049-54
  12. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;356:730-33
  13. Fantin AC, Hetzer FH, Christ AD, et al. Influence of stapler haemorrhoidectomy on anorectal function and on patients’ acceptance. Swiss Med Wkly 2002;132:38-42
  14. Filho FL, Macedo GM, Dos Santos AA, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy transiently decreases rectal compliance and sensitivity. Colorectal Dis 2009 Nov 2
  15. Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PHD, Malthaner R. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher longterm recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1297-05
  16. Faucheron JL, Berod AA, Riboud R, Morra I. Rectal perforat