Journals / KBB-Forum / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF CRANIAL MRI NOISE ON INNER EAR

KRANİYAL MR GÜRÜLTÜSÜNÜN İÇ KULAK ÜZERINE ETKİSİ

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
30–36
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although the level of prestin slightly increases, cranial MRI noise does not cause hearing loss in any patient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Exposure to intense noise may result in damage to the inner ear hair cells.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, high-level noise generated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) causes concern for potential damage to the inner ear.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although the level of prestin slightly increases, cranial MRI noise does not cause hearing loss in any patient.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Exposure to intense noise may result in damage to the inner ear hair cells. Therefore, high-level noise generated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) causes concern for potential damage to the inner ear. This study aimed to evaluate any damage to the inner ear in patients undergoing cranial MRI without any ear plugs. Material and Methods: Thirty four patients who underwent cranial MRI without any ear plugs were reviewed prospectively. Audiometry , distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level and prestin-level were evaluated respectively; a) two hours before MRI, b) twentyfour hours after MRI, and c) fourteen days after MRI. Results: No statistical difference was found between three audiometric assessments in both ears for each frequency. There was no statistical difference between the three DPOAE assessments in both ears for each frequency. Although the level of prestin increased slightly in the second assessment, there was no statistical difference between the three prestin level assessments (P=0.31). Conclusion: Although the level of prestin slightly increases, cranial MRI noise does not cause hearing loss in any patient.

Özet

Amaç: Yüksek sese maruz kalmak, iç kulak tüylü hücrelerine zarar verebilir. Bu nedenle, manyetik rezonans (MR) görüntüleme tarafından üretilen yüksek seviyede gürültü, iç kulakta hasar oluşturma riski oluşturur. Bu çalışmada, kulak tıkacı kullanılmadan kraniyal MR uygulanan hastalarda iç kulak hasarın değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Yöntem ve Gereçler: Kulak tıkacı kullanılmadan kraniyal MR uygulanan 34 hasta prospektif olarak incelendi. Odyometri, distorsiyon ürünü otoakustik emisyon (DPOAE) seviyesi ve prestin seviyesi sırasıyla; a) MR'dan iki saat önce, b) MR'dan yirmi dört saat sonra ve c) MR'dan on dört gün sonra değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Her frekans için her iki kulakta yapılan üç odyometrik değerlendirme arasında istatistiksel fark bulunmadı. Her frekans için her iki kulakta üç DPOAE değerlendirmesi arasında istatistiksel bir fark yoktu. İkinci değerlendirmede prestin seviyesi biraz yükselmesine rağmen üç prestin seviyesi değerlendirmesi arasında istatistiksel bir fark yoktu. Sonuç: Prestin seviyesi hafif yükselmesine rağmen kraniyal MR gürültüsü hiç bir hastada işitme kaybına sebep olmamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULĞURCU, S., ÜNSAL, M. A., ÇEKİN, E., ERKUL, E., ÖZÇELİK, F., İNCEDAYI, M. (2022). THE IMPACT OF CRANIAL MRI NOISE ON INNER EAR. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/573068

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Waqas M, Gao S, Salam I, Ali MK, Ma Y, Li W. Inner Ear Hair Cell Protection in Mammals against the Noise-Induced Cochlear Damage Neural Plast. 2018;2018:3170801
  2. Hill K, Yuan H, Wang X, Sha SH. Noise-InducedLoss of Hair Cells and Cochlear Synaptopathy Are Mediated by the Activation of AMPK. J Neurosci. 201613;36:7497-510
  3. Lin X, Shan X, Lin S, Shu B, Wang Y, XiaoW. Is Sensorineural Hearing Loss Related to Chronic Rhinosinusitis Caused by Outer Hair Cell Injury? MedSciMonit. 2019;25:627-36
  4. Kemp DT. Otoacousticemissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. BrMedBull, 2002;63:223-41
  5. Porto MA, Gahyva DL, Lauris JR, Lopes AC. Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise. Pro-fono. 2004;16:237-50
  6. Wang Y, Yang B, Li Y, Hou L, Hu Y, Han Y. Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke ZaZhi. 2000;35:26-8
  7. Wei W, Heinze S, Gerstner DG, Walser SM, Twardella D, ReiterC, et al. Audiometric Notch and Extended HighFrequencyHearing Threshold Shift in Relation to Total Leisure Noise Exposure: An Exploratory Analysis. NoiseHealth. 2017;19: 263-269
  8. Abrashkin KA, Izumikawa M, Miyazawa T, Wang CH, Crumling MA, Swiderski DL, et al. The fate of outer hair cells after acoustic or ototoxic insults. HearRes 2006;218:20- 9
  9. Bird JE, Daudet N, Warchol ME, Gale JE. Supporting cells eliminate dying sensory hair cells to maintain epithelial integrity in the avian innerear. J Neurosci 2010;30:12545-56
  10. Parham K, Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen J. Outer Hair Cell Molecular Protein, Prestin, as a Serum Biomarker for Hearing Loss: Proof of Concept. OtolNeurotol. 2016;37:1217-22
  11. Cao X, Fischer E, Gruschke O, Korvink JG, Hennig J, Maunder AM, et al. The noise factor of receiver coil matching networks in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;37:252-9
  12. Hurwitz R, Lane SR, Bell RA, Brant?Zawadzki MN. Acoustic analysis of gradient coil noise in MR imaging. Radiology 1989;173:545-48
  13. Mollasadeghi A, Mehrparvar AH, Atighechi S, Davari MH, Shokouh P, Mostaghaci M, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss after magnetic resonance imaging. Case RepRadiol. 2013;2013:510258
  14. Govindaraju R, Omar R, Rajagopalan R, Norlisah R, KwanHoong N. Hearing loss after noise exposure. AurisNasusLarynx. 2011;38:519-22
  15. Reavis KM, McMillan G, Austin D, Gallun F, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, et al. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission test performance for