SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs on Efficiency of Dialogues in the 8th Grade ELT Coursebook: Sociopragmatic Problems

Öğretmen Adaylarının 8. Sınıf İngilizce Ders Kitabındaki Diyalogların Etkinliği Konusunda İnançları: Toplumedim Sorunları

H. Sezgi SÜZER SARAÇ
Pages
401–410
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, the majority of participants did not find the dialogues efficient in relation to sociopragmatics, and they proposed ways to improve the material.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, pre-service teachers’ beliefs on the efficiency of dialogues in the 8th grade ELT coursebook have been investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sociopragmatic problems observed in these dialogues are the main subject of discussion in this study. 100 prospective teachers studying at Hacettepe University, division of ELT participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, the majority of participants did not find the dialogues efficient in relation to sociopragmatics, and they proposed ways to improve the material.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, pre-service teachers’ beliefs on the efficiency of dialogues in the 8th grade ELT coursebook have been investigated. The sociopragmatic problems observed in these dialogues are the main subject of discussion in this study. 100 prospective teachers studying at Hacettepe University, division of ELT participated in the study. The means of data collection was a questionnaire composed of two parts: pre-service teachers’ beliefs on dialogues efficiency and suggestions to adapt those dialogues. According to the results, the majority of participants did not find the dialogues efficient in relation to sociopragmatics, and they proposed ways to improve the material.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, öğretmen adaylarının 8. sınıf İngilizce ders kitaplarındaki diyalogların etkinliği üzerine inançları araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın kapsamı diyaloglardaki toplumedim sorunları olarak belirlenmiştir. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, İngilizce Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalında okuyan 100 öğretmen adayı çalışmaya katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı iki kısımdan oluşan bir ankettir. İlk kısımda, diyalogların etkinliği üzerine öğretmen inancı, ikinci kısımda da materyal uyarlama ile ilgili öneriler sorgulanmaktadır. Sonuçlara göre, katılımcıların büyük çoğunluğu diyalogları toplumedim açısından etkili bulmamakta ve materyali geliştirmek için önerilerde bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARAÇ, H. S. S. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs on Efficiency of Dialogues in the 8th Grade ELT Coursebook: Sociopragmatic Problems. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 401–410. https://ajindex.com/articles/572620

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Demircan, Ö. (1990). Yabancı-Dil Öğretim Yöntemleri: Yardımcı alanlar, öğrenme ve öğretme yolları, yabancı-dil öğretiminde uygulanan yaklaşım ve yöntemler. İstanbul: Ekin Eğitim Yayıncılık
  2. Koç, S. (1979), “BAYDÖ’de Öğrencilerin Dil Gereksinimlerinin Saptanması: İşlevseliletişimsel yaklaşım,” İzlem 3. 41-49
  3. Demirel, Ö. (1990). Yabancı dil öğretimi: İlkeler, yöntemler, teknikler. Ankara: Usem Yayınları
  4. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  5. Allwright, R.L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-18
  6. Brown, G. ve Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press
  7. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman
  8. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. Language and Communication. Richards, J. C. ve Schmidt, R.W. (ed.). Longman. 2-27
  9. Harlow, L. (1990). Do they mean what they say?: Sociopragmatic competence and second language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 328-51
  10. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  11. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  12. Fromkin, V. ve Rodman, R. (1993). An introduction to language. New York: Barcourt Brace College Press
  13. Olstain, E. (1989). Apologies across language. S. Blum-Kulka, J. House ve G. Kasper (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics (s.155-173) Norwood, NJ: Ablex
  14. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
  15. Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  16. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. J. Sikula, Buttery, T.J. ve Guyton, E. (ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (s. 102-119). NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan
  17. Kagan, D. M. ve Smith, K. E. (1988). Beliefs and behaviors of kindergarten teachers. Educational Researcher, 30(1), 26-35
  18. Lonberger, R. B. (1992). The belief systems and instrutional choices of preservice teachers. Padak, N.D., Rasinksi, T. V. Ve Logan, J. (eds), Literacy research and practice, foundations for the year 2000. (s. 71-78). Pitsburg: College Reading Association
  19. Stuart, C. ve Thurlow, D. (2000). Making it their own: Preservice teachers’ experiences, beliefs, and classroom practice. Journal of T