Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

The concept of functıon ın textbooks: the turkısh and the french samples

Ders kitaplarında fonksiyon kavramı: Türkiye ve Fransa örneği

Pages
199–220
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, while in the Turkish textbooks control structure is not included, in the French textbooks it is considered important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to present mathematics organizations related to the notion of function in textbooks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study which is carried out by using document analysis method, two Turkish and two French textbooks are analyzed by comprising to each other.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, while in the Turkish textbooks control structure is not included, in the French textbooks it is considered important.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present mathematics organizations related to the notion of function in textbooks. In this study which is carried out by using document analysis method, two Turkish and two French textbooks are analyzed by comprising to each other. The results of the study revealed that in the analyzed textbooks, there are many differences from the curriculums. However, apart from those differences it is also determined that mathematics organizations related to the definitions and properties used in both countries differ from one another. Especially, it attracts the attention that the French course books include varied kinds of problems and because of it they present a rich content. Moreover, while in the Turkish textbooks control structure is not included, in the French textbooks it is considered important.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ders kitaplarında fonksiyon kavramı ile ilgili sunulan matematik organizasyonlarını ortaya koymaktır. Doküman analizi yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan bu çalışmada iki Türk iki de Fransız ders kitabı karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Ders kitaplarında öğretim programlarından kaynaklanan farklılıklar vardır. Fakat bunların dışında da her iki ülkede ortak olarak kullanılan tanım ve özelliklerle ilgili matematik organizasyonlarında da önemli farklılıkların olduğu saptanmıştır. Özellikle Fransız ders kitaplarında çok farklı problem tiplerine yer verildiği ve dolayısıyla zengin bir içeriğin sunulduğu dikkat çekmektedir. Ayrıca Türk ders kitaplarında kontrol yapısına hiç yer verilmezken, Fransız ders kitaplarında bu durumun önemsendiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞTÜRK, S., YAVUZ, İ. (2022). The concept of functıon ın textbooks: the turkısh and the french samples. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 199–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/572567

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Teters, P. and Gabel, D. (1984), 1982-83 Results of the NSTA survey of the needs of elementary teachers regarding their teaching of science, Washington, National Science Teachers Association
  2. Sheldon, L.E.(1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials, ELT Journal 42, 237–246
  3. Sharp, A. (1999) Aspects of English medium textbook use in Hong Kong, New Horizons in Education 40, 93–102
  4. Pepin, B. and Haggarty, L. (2001) Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms, Zentrablatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik 33, 158–175
  5. Skiersko, A. (1991) Textbook selection and evaluation, in M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, Boston, Heinle & Heinle, pp. 432-453
  6. Rymarz, R. and Engebretson, K. (2005) Putting textbooks to work, British Journal of Religious Education 27, 53–63
  7. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  8. Tanner, D. (1988) The textbook controversies, in L.N. Tanner (ed.), Critical Issues in Curriculum (Eighty-SeventhYearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I), National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, 122–147
  9. Dörfler,W. and McLone, R.R. (1986) Mathematics as a school subject, in B. Christiansen, A.G. Howson and M. Otte (eds.), Perspectives in Mathematics Education, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 49–97
  10. Farrell, J.P. and Heyneman, S.P. (1994) Planning for textbook development in developing countries, in T. Hus´en and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., Vol. 2), BPC Wheatons, pp. 6360–6366
  11. Woodward, A. (1994) Textbooks, in T. Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite(eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., Vol. 2),Exeter, pp.6366–6371
  12. Herbst, P. (1995) The Construction of the Real Number System in Textbooks: A Contribution to the Analysis of Discursive Practices in Mathematics, unpublished master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens
  13. Ball, D.L. and Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988) Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators, Curriculum Inquiry 18, 401–423
  14. Burstein, L.(ed.), (1993) The IEA Study of Mathematics 3: Student Growth and Classroom Processes, Pergamon Press, Oxford
  15. Kuhs, T.M. and Freeman, D.J. (1979) The Potential Influence of Textbooks on Teachers’ Selection of Content for Elementary School Mathematics, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American