Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6

The Validity and Reliability Study of The Turkish Version of The Preparedness to Teach Scale

Öğretmenliğe Hazır Olma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Pages
2311–2326
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It may be suggested that the Turkish version of the Preparedness to Teach Scale is a valid and reliable instrument which can be used to determine prospective teachers’ preparedness to teach

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to adapt the Preparedness to Teach Scale into Turkish and investigate the psychometric properties of the scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted in the academic year of 2015-2016 with the participation of a total of 535 prospective teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It may be suggested that the Turkish version of the Preparedness to Teach Scale is a valid and reliable instrument which can be used to determine prospective teachers’ preparedness to teach
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to adapt the Preparedness to Teach Scale into Turkish and investigate the psychometric properties of the scale. The research was conducted in the academic year of 2015-2016 with the participation of a total of 535 prospective teachers. In the adaptation process, first of all the linguistic equivalence of the translation of the scale was examined. Then a positive, strong and significant correlation was detected between the Turkish and English forms of the scale. As a result of the validity and reliability study, a fourfactor scale with 20 items was formed. It may be suggested that the Turkish version of the Preparedness to Teach Scale is a valid and reliable instrument which can be used to determine prospective teachers’ preparedness to teach

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Öğretmenliğe Hazır Olma Ölçeğini Türkçe'ye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Araştırma 2015-2016 Öğretim Yılı Güzdöneminde toplam 535 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Ölçeğin Türkçe'ye uyarlanması sürecinde ilk olarak ölçeğin çevirisine ilişkin dilsel eşdeğerliği incelenmiş ve İngilizce ile Türkçe formlara ilişkin puanlar arasında pozitif yönde, yüksek düzeyde ve anlamlı bir korelasyon saptanmıştır. Sonrasında yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları neticesinde 20 maddeden oluşan dört faktörlü bir ölçek elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, Öğretmenliğe Hazır Olma Ölçeği Türkçe formunun öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenliğe hazır olma durumlarını ölçmek amacıyla kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KALMAN, M., YILDIRIM, İ. (2022). The Validity and Reliability Study of The Turkish Version of The Preparedness to Teach Scale. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 6, 2311–2326. https://ajindex.com/articles/571878

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aypay, A. (2009). Teachers’ evaluation of their pre-service teacher training. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1113-1123.
  2. Balkar, B. (2014). Klinik temelli yaklaşımın bilgi alanlarını kapsayan araştırma-temelli öğretmen eğitimi politikasına ilişkin öğretmen algıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(4), 28-45.
  3. Beare, P., Torgerson, C., Marshall, J., Tracz, S., & Chiero, R. (2012). Examination of alternative programs of teacher preparation on a single campus. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(4), 55-74.
  4. Bernardi, R. A. (1994). Validating research results when Cronbach’s alpha is below.70: A methodological procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 766-775.
  5. Blomberg, S. & Knight, B. A. (2015). Investigating novice teacher experiences of the teaching dynamics operating in selected school communities in Finland. Improving Schools, 18(2), 157-170.
  6. Brown, A. L., Lee, J., & Collins, D. (2015). Does student teaching matter? Investigating pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy and preparedness. Teaching Education, 26(1), 77-93.
  7. Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. London: Sage. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (13. Baskı). Ankara:
  8. PegemAkademi. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge. Çapa, Y. (2005). Factors influencing first-year teachers’ sense of efficacy. unpublished doctoral dissertation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Ohio State University. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum Press.
  9. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (3. Baskı). Ankara:
  10. PegemAkademi Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173.
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
  12. Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302.
  13. Darling-Hammond, L., Eiler, M., & Marcus, A. (2002). Perceptions of preparation: Using survey data to assess teacher education outcomes. Issues in Teacher Education, 11(1), 65-84.
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.