Journals / Karya Journal of Health Science / 2022 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINING THE ATTITUDES TOWARDS INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE, GENERALIZED ANXIETY AND INFLUENCING FACTORS DURING THE QUARANTINE PROCESS DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC

COVID-19 NEDENİYLE YAŞANAN KARANTİNA SÜRECİNDE YAKIN İLİŞKİLERDE ŞİDDETE YÖNELİK TUTUMUN, YAYGIN ANKSİYETENİN VE ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN BELİRLENMESİ

Pages
126–132
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A positive relationship determined between the mean scores obtained from the Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was conducted to determine the attitudes towards intimate partner violence, generalized anxiety and the factors affecting them during the quarantine process due to COVID-19 pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study data were collected between the April 1, 2020 and the May 31, 2020 from 557 participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A positive relationship determined between the mean scores obtained from the Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yakın Partner Şiddeti · Anksiyete · COVID-19 Pandemisi

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the attitudes towards intimate partner violence, generalized anxiety and the factors affecting them during the quarantine process due to COVID-19 pandemic. Method: This study was designed as a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The study data were collected between the April 1, 2020 and the May 31, 2020 from 557 participants. The survey questions in the study were created as an online survey via Google Form and sent to the participants’ social media addresses. The study data were collected using the Personal Information Form, Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. Results: Of the participants, 43.8% experienced economic difficulties due to the epidemic, 54.3% stated that their family relations were adversely affected during the pandemic, 44.7% quarreled with other members of the family more at home during the pandemic, 26.5% stated that quarrels during the quarantine became intensified. In this study, the mean scores obtained from the Partner Violence Attitude Scale were low (35.19±8.93). The mean scores obtained from the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale were moderate (7.40±5.27). A positive relationship determined between the mean scores obtained from the Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırma COVID-19 nedeniyle yaşanan karantina sürecinde yakın ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutumunun, yaygın anksiyetenin ve bunları etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel olarak planlanan araştırmanın verileri Türkiye’de evde kalmanın zorunlu olduğu 1 Nisan 2020 ile 31 Mayıs 2020 tarihleri arasında 557 katılımcıdan toplandı. Araştırmadaki anket soruları Google Form aracılığıyla online anket olarak oluşturuldu ve katılımcılara sosyal medya üzerinden gönderildi. Araştırma verilerinin toplanmasında Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Yakın İlişkilerde Şiddete Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği ve Yaygın Anksiyete Bozukluğu Ölçeği kullanıldı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların %43.8’i salgın nedeniyle ekonomik sıkıntı yaşadığını, %54.3’ü salgın sürecinde aile içi ilişkilerinin etkilendiğini, %44.7’si salgın sürecinde ev içinde tartışma yaşadığını, %26.5’i karantinada tartışmalarının şiddetlendiğini ifade ettiler. Çalışmada katılımcıların Yakın İlişkilerde Şiddete Yönelik Tutum puan ortalaması düşük bulundu (35.19±8.93). Katılımcıların Yaygın Anksiyete Bozukluğu puan ortalamasının orta düzeyde olduğu belirlendi (7.40±5.27). Katılımcıların karantina sürecinde yakın ilişkilerde şiddete yönelik tutumu ile anksiyete bozukluğu arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, Ş., YANMIŞ, S. (2022). DETERMINING THE ATTITUDES TOWARDS INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE, GENERALIZED ANXIETY AND INFLUENCING FACTORS DURING THE QUARANTINE PROCESS DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Karya Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 126–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/571604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Miller E, McCaw B. Intimate partner violence. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):850-857. El‐Serag R, Thurston RC. Matters of the heart and mind: Interpersonal violence and cardiovascular disease in women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(4):e015479. Ingram KM, Espelage DL, Davis JP, Merrin GJ. Family violence, sibling, and peer aggression during adolescence: Associations with behavioral health outcomes. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:1-14.
  2. Boserup B, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(12):2753-2755.
  3. Hall BJ, Tucker JD. Surviving in place: The coronavirus domestic violence syndemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;53:102179. Bradley NL, DiPasquale AM, Dillabough K, Schneider PS. Health care practitioners’ responsibility to address intimate partner violence related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Can Med Assoc J. 2020;192(22):E609-E610. Mahase E. Covid-19: EU states report 60% rise in emergency calls about domestic violence. BMJ. 2020;369:m1872. Bradbury‐Jones C, Isham L. The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID‐19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(13–14):2047-2049.
  4. Roesch E, Amin A, Gupta J, García-Moreno C. Violence against women during covid-19 pandemic restrictions. BMJ. 2020;369:1-2.
  5. Cluver L, Lachman JM, Sherr L, Wessels I, Krug E, Rakotomalala S, Blight S, Hillis S, Bachman G, Green O, Butchart A, Tomlinson M, Ward CL, Doubt J, McDonald K. Parenting in a time of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):e64. Mazza M, Marano G, Lai C, Janiri L, Sani G. Danger in danger: Interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113046. Roesch E, Amin A, Gupta J, García-Moreno C. Violence against women during Covid-19 pandemic restrictions. BMJ. 2020;369:m1712. Orpinas P, Hsieh H-L, Song X, Holland K, Nahapetyan L. Trajectories of physical dating violence from middle to high school: Association with relationship quality and acceptability of aggression. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(4):551-565.
  6. Clarey A, Hokoda A, Ulloa EC. Anger control and acceptance of violence as mediators in the relationship between exposure to interparental conflict and dating violence perpetration in Mexican adolescents. J Fam Violence. 2010;25(7):619-625.
  7. Toplu Demirtaş E, Hatipoğlu Sümer Z, Fincham FD. Intimate partner violence in Turkey: The Turkish Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale-Revised. J Fam Violence. 2017;32(3):349-356.
  8. Spencer C, Mallory AB, Cafferky BM, Kimmes JG, Beck AR, Stith SM. Mental health