Journals / Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Digital Parenting: Perceptions on Digital Risks

Dijital Ebeveynlik: Dijital Risklere Dair Algılar

Pages
131–157
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, according to the findings from content analysis, parents utilized several parenting strategies and they needed to be educated on both risks and opportunities of digital media for their children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, child rearing has become more complicated since the recent changes caused by digital technologies in daily lives of families.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seventy-nine parents (38 mothers and 41 fathers) of children aged 10 to 18 responded to survey on digital risks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, according to the findings from content analysis, parents utilized several parenting strategies and they needed to be educated on both risks and opportunities of digital media for their children.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, child rearing has become more complicated since the recent changes caused by digital technologies in daily lives of families. Digital media brings both new learning opportunities and risks for its consumers simultaneously. Especially, children and adolescents are susceptible for the digital risks. Parents are expected to have a mediating role for their children in adapting digital life. The purpose of the study was to investigate parents’ perceptions related to digital risks and on what aspects of digital media (risks or opportunities) they wanted to be trained. Seventy-nine parents (38 mothers and 41 fathers) of children aged 10 to 18 responded to survey on digital risks. Parents’ perceptions related to the risks involved in the digital media were investigated by forced-choice and open-ended questions and the responses analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results revealed that, parents had knowledge on digital risks and taking precautions against those risks. Besides, according to the findings from content analysis, parents utilized several parenting strategies and they needed to be educated on both risks and opportunities of digital media for their children.

Özet

Dijital teknolojideki ilerlemeler günlük hayatı doğrudan etkilemekte veözellikle bu teknolojilerin çocuklar ve gençler tarafından kullanımı,ebeveynlerin temel sorumluluğu olan çocuk yetiştirme işini karmaşıklaştırmaktadır. Dijital medya kullanıcılarına, öğrenme fırsatlarını sunarken bir yandan da dijital riskleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Ebeveynlerise çocuklarını öğrenme fırsatlarından yararlandırma ve onları dijitalrisklerden koruma arasında kalmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ebeveynlerin dijital risklere ve bu risklere yönelik tedbir almak konusundakendilerini ne kadar yeterli gördüklerine dair algılarının ve dijital medyanın çocukları tarafından kullanımına aracılık ederken hangi boyutlarda daha fazla bilgi sahibi olmak istediklerinin incelenmesidir. Buamaçla, 38 anne ve 41 babadan oluşan, çocuklarının yaşları 10 ila 18arasında değişen 79 ebeveyne, kapalı ve açık uçlu sorulardan oluşan biranket uygulanmıştır. Bu sorulardan elde edilen bulgular ise nicel ve nitel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, ebeveynlerin risklerhakkında bilgili olduklarını, önlemler konusunda da kendilerini bilgisahibi olarak değerlendirdiklerini gösterirken, yapılan içerik analiziebeveynlerin dijital ebeveynlik stratejilerini ve dijital medyanın risklerive olanaklarına dair hangi noktalarda daha fazla bilgi sahibi olmak istediklerini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, G. İ., Bayraktar, D. M., Yılmaz, Ö. (2022). Digital Parenting: Perceptions on Digital Risks. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 131–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/570222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anderson, C. and Bushman, B. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353-359.
  2. Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoğlu, A., Sarıbeyoğlu, S., Çıplak, S., Yılmaz, N. and Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253-261.
  3. Aslan, A. (2016). The changes in safer internet use of children in Turkey between the years of 2010-2015 and impacts of related implementations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences. Austin, E. W. (1990). Effects of family communication on children’s interpretation of television. In J. Bryant and J. A. Bryant, (Eds.). Television and the American family (377-395).
  4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Bartholow, B. D. and Anderson, C. (2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 283-290.
  5. Berson, I. R. and Berson, M. J. (2005). Challenging online behaviors of youthfindings from a comparative analysis of young people in the United States and New Zealand. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 29-38.
  6. Bornstein, M. H. (2001). Parenting: Science and practice. Parenting, 1(2), 1- 4. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2001.9681208. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68-76.
  7. Chaudron, S., Beutel, M. E., Donoso Navarrete, V., Dreier, M., Fletcher-Watson, B., Heikkilä, A. S. and Mascheroni, G. (2015). Young children (0- 8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries (EUR-Scientific and Technical Research Reports). Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from; http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239.
  8. Cheng, C. and Li, A. Y. (2014). Internet addiction prevalence and quality of real life: A meta-analysis of 31 nations across seven world regions. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking, 17, 755-760.
  9. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343.
  10. Cohen, L. Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge. Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbacılık. Çetin, A. B. and Ceyhan, A.