Journals / Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Attachment Styles, Love Types, Emotional Expression and Life Satisfaction

Bağlanma Stilleri ile Aşk Tipleri, Duygusal Dışavurum ve Yaşam Doyumu Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
597–619
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed thatparticipants who were securely attached to their romantic partners preferred Eroslove type more, while participants who were insecurely attached to their romanticpartners decided on Ludus, Pragma and Mania love types.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current study examines the association between attachment styles in romanticrelations and love type preference, emotional expression, and life satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twohundred twenty-six volunteers participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed thatparticipants who were securely attached to their romantic partners preferred Eroslove type more, while participants who were insecurely attached to their romanticpartners decided on Ludus, Pragma and Mania love types.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The current study examines the association between attachment styles in romanticrelations and love type preference, emotional expression, and life satisfaction. Twohundred twenty-six volunteers participated in the study. Results showed thatparticipants who were securely attached to their romantic partners preferred Eroslove type more, while participants who were insecurely attached to their romanticpartners decided on Ludus, Pragma and Mania love types. There was no differencebetween secure and insecure attachment styles in terms of Storge and Agape lovetypes. Moreover, there was no difference between groups in terms of generalemotional expression. Participants who were securely attached had higher lifesatisfaction than those who were insecure. It is argued that differentiation power onemotional expression and life satisfaction might be obtained with studies aboutattachment styles in the romantic relationship.

Özet

Bu çalışma romantik ilişkilerde bağlanma stilleri ile aşk tipi tercihi, duygusal ifade ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışmaya 226 gönüllü katılmıştır. Sonuçlar, romantik partnerlerine güvenli bağlanmış katılımcıların Eros aşk tipini; görece güvensiz bağlanmış katılımcıların ise Ludus, Pragma ve Mania aşk tiplerini tercih ettiklerini göstermiştir. Romantik partnerlerine güvenli ve güvensiz bağlanan katılımcıların Storge ve Agape aşk tipi tercihleri arasında bir farklılık görülmemiştir. Ayrıca, partnerlerine güvenli ya da güvensiz bağlanan gruplar arasında genel duygusal dışavurum açısından anlamlı bir farklılık yoktur. Son olarak, romantik partnerlerine güvenli bağlanan katılımcıların, güvensiz olanlardan daha fazla yaşam doyumuna sahip oldukları belirlenmiştir. Romantik ilişkilerde bağlanma stillerine yönelik çalışmalar ile duygusal dışavurumlar ve yaşam doyumuna yönelik farklılaştırma gücünün elde edilebileceği tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOKSAN, S. (2022). The Relationship between Attachment Styles, Love Types, Emotional Expression and Life Satisfaction. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 597–619. https://ajindex.com/articles/570217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adil, A. and Kamal, A. (2005). Relationship between love styles, attachment styles, and narcissism among university students. Indian Psychological Review, 64, 33-52.
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1979). Infant-mother attachment. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 932-937. Doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.932. Akın, A. (2011). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Berkeley Expressivity Scale. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 27-33. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.006. Aron, A., and Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 535-551. Doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.535. Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147-178. Doi:10.1177/0265407590072001.
  3. Berscheid, E., and Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Volume I, attachment. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Volume II, separation anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Volume III, loss separation and depression. NewYork: Basic Books. Bugay, A. and Tezer, E. (2008, March). Attachment styles and loving attitudes among Turkish university students. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Global Conference: Persons, Intimacy and Love, Salzburg, Austria. Büyükşahin, A. and Hovardaoğlu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aşka ilişkin tutumlarının Lee'nin çok boyutlu aşk biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 59-72.
  4. Cassidy, J. (2008). The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver, (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 3-22).
  5. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  6. Costa, A. L., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C., Tavares, H. and Zilberman, M. L. (2015). Pathological jealousy: Romantic relationship characteristics, emotional and personality aspects, and social adjustment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 38-44. Doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.017. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. Doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. Feeney, J. A. (2016). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver, (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 435-463). Ne