Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 5

Bimanual Capsulorhexis Using a New Hand Tool: An Experimental Study in Sheep Eye

Yeni Bir El Aleti Kullanarak Bimanuel Kapsüloreksis: Koyun Gözünde Deneysel Çalışma

Pages
769–774
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study showed that CCC was performed using the newly designed PLAhand tool more successfully than the classical method by the beginning surgeon

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to design a cheap and easy-to-use hand tool that allows a better-centered capsulorhexis of consistent shapeand size for inexperienced and experienced surgeons in cataract surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty-five eyes of dead adult sheep from a local slaughterhousewere grouped as; group 1, the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) group (n: 15); group 2, the cerclage wire group (n: 15); and group3, the polylactic acid (PLA) hand tool group (n: 15).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study showed that CCC was performed using the newly designed PLAhand tool more successfully than the classical method by the beginning surgeon
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design a cheap and easy-to-use hand tool that allows a better-centered capsulorhexis of consistent shapeand size for inexperienced and experienced surgeons in cataract surgery. Forty-five eyes of dead adult sheep from a local slaughterhousewere grouped as; group 1, the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) group (n: 15); group 2, the cerclage wire group (n: 15); and group3, the polylactic acid (PLA) hand tool group (n: 15). In group 1, one corneal incision was made. In groups 2 and 3, two incisions were made at3:00 and 11:00 o’clock directions. Methylene blue was used for capsular staining. After injecting viscoelastic into the anterior chamber andthe capsule was punctured, the devices were inserted at 3:00 o’clock. All capulorhexes were performed using the Utrata forceps following theinternal contour of the devices. As a result of the study, capsulorhexes were successfully performed in 9 of 15 eyes in group 1; 2 of 15 eyes ingroup 2; and 12 of 15 eyes in group 3. Statistically, the correlation between the distributions of groups 1 and 2 (χ²=7.033, P=0.008); and forgroups 1 and 3 (χ²=6.171, P=0.002) were found to be significant. This study showed that CCC was performed using the newly designed PLAhand tool more successfully than the classical method by the beginning surgeon

Özet

Bu çalışma, katarakt cerrahisinde deneyimsiz ve deneyimli cerrahlar için kullanımı kolay, ucuz ve uygun şekil ve boyutta sentralize bir kapsüloreksis yapılabilmesine olanak tanıyan bir el aleti tasarlamak amacıyla yapıldı. Yerel bir mezbahaneden toplanan 45 ölü koyun gözü; grup 1, sürekli eğrisel kapsüloreksis (CCC) grubu (n: 15); grup 2, serklaj tel grubu (n: 15); ve grup 3, polilaktik asit (PLA) aleti grubu (n: 15) olarak ayrıldı. Grup 1’de bir korneal ensizyon yapıldı. Grup 2 ve 3’te, saat 3:00 ve 11:00 yönlerinde iki ensizyon yapıldı. Kapsül, metilen mavisi ile boyandı. Ön kamaraya viskoelastik enjekte edildikten sonra kapsül delindi, cihazlar saat 3: 00 yönünden yerleştirildi. Tüm kapsüloreksisler, cihazların iç kontürünü izleyen Utrata forsepsi kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Çalışma sonucunda, grup 1’deki 15 gözün 9’u, grup 2’deki 15 gözün 2’si; ve grup 3’teki 15 gözün 12’sinde kapsüloreksis başarıyla gerçekleştirildi. İstatistiksel olarak, grup 1 ve 2’nin (χ²=7.033, P=0.008); ve grup 1 ve 3’ün (χ²=6.171, P=0.002) dağılımları arasındaki korelasyon anlamlı bulundu. Bu çalışma, deneyimsiz cerrah tarafından yeni tasarlanmış PLA cihaz kullanılarak yapılan CCC’nin klasik yönteme göre daha başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAYI, K., GÜLTEKİN, Ç., AYTAÇ, E. (2022). Bimanual Capsulorhexis Using a New Hand Tool: An Experimental Study in Sheep Eye. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 5, 769–774. https://ajindex.com/articles/569817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Little BC, Smith JH, Packer M: Little capsulorhexis tear-out rescue. J Cataract Refract Surg, 32 (9): 1420-1422, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs. 2006.03.038 Mohammadpour M, Erfanian R, Karimi N: Capsulorhexis: Pearls and pitfalls. Saudi J Ophthalmol, 26 (1): 33-40, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j. sjopt.2011.10.007 Mohammadpour M: Management of radial tears during capsulorhexis. Tech Ophthalmol, 4 (2): 56-60, 2006. Mohammadpour M: Rescue of an extending capsulorrhexis by creating a midway tangential anterior capsular flap: A novel technique in 22 eyes. Can J Ophthalmol, 45 (3): 256-258, 2010. DOI: 10.3129/i09-260 Tahi H, Fantes F, Hamaoui M, Parel JM: Small peripheral anterior continuous curvilinear capsulohexis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 25 (6): 744- 747, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00041-3
  2. Sengupta S, Dhanapal P, Nath M, Haripriya A, Venkatesh R: Goat’s eye integrated with a human cataractous lens: A training model for phacoemulsification. Indian J Ophthalmol, 63 (3): 275-277, 2015. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.156937 Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M: Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg, 25 (12): 1052-1060, 2009. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04
  3. Nuutinen JP, Clerc C, Virta T, Törmälä P: Effect of gamma, ethylene oxide, electron beam, and plasma sterilization on the behaviour of SRPLLA fibres in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 13 (12): 1325-1336, 2002. DOI: 10.1163/15685620260449723 Lunt J: Large-scale production, properties and commercial applications of polylactic acid polymers. Polym Degrad Stab, 59 (1-3): 145-152, 1998. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00148-1
  4. Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Planell JA, Navarro M: 3D printed PLAbased scaffolds: A versatile tool in regenerative medicine. Organogenesis, 9 (4): 239-244, 2013. DOI: 10.4161/org.26048 Rankin TM, Giovinco NA, Cucher DJ, Watts G, Hurwitz B, Armstrong DG: Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: Are we there yet? J Surg Res, 189 (2): 193-197, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.02.020 Kondor S, Grant CG, Liacouras P, Schmid MJR, Parsons LM, Rastogi VK, Macedonia C: On demand additive manufacturing of a basic surgical kit. J Med Devices, 7 (3): 030916, 2013. DOI: 10.1115/1.4024490 Fedorovich NE, Alblas J, Hennink WE, Öner FC, Dhert WJ: Organ printing: The future of bone regeneration? Trends Biotechnol, 29 (12): 601- 606, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.07.001 Hooshmand J, Abell RG, Allen P, Vote BJ: Thermal capsulotomy: Initial clinical experience