Journals / Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Effectiveness of outrigger and belt truss systems on the seismic behaviorof high-rise buildings

Pages
180–203
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These records were scaled in accordance with theDD2 level earthquake design spectrum defined in Turkish Building Earthquake Standards (2018) and used in the analyses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The outrigger systems, which is widely used with shear wall-framed systems at the tall buildings, increase the lateral stiffness of the structural bearing system and reduce the lateral drift of the structure under lateral loads.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, the traditional outrigger systems, besides these positive contributions, also create some limitations and problems affecting the modeling of the structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These records were scaled in accordance with theDD2 level earthquake design spectrum defined in Turkish Building Earthquake Standards (2018) and used in the analyses.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The outrigger systems, which is widely used with shear wall-framed systems at the tall buildings, increase the lateral stiffness of the structural bearing system and reduce the lateral drift of the structure under lateral loads. However, the traditional outrigger systems, besides these positive contributions, also create some limitations and problems affecting the modeling of the structure. Some of these; more interior space occupying as an architect, problems arising in the connection of outrigger and center core (especially when a concrete shear-wall core is used). On the other hand, the belt trusses known as “Virtual Outriggers”which have recently been used to build high-rise structures, haveremovedthese problems. Unlike the traditional outrigger systems,belt trusses areformed between the outer columns. In this way belt trusses eliminate the problems arising from the direct connection of the outriggers to the center core and other problems associated with using outriggers. Extensive studies have been carried out on the examination of outrigger and belt truss systems used in high-rise buildings under static and dynamic loads. In this study, the linear earthquake responses of three structural models, which are shear wall-framed system, shear wall-framed system with traditional outriggers and shear wall-framed system with belt trusses, were performed by using modal time history analysis method. Lateral displacements and drifts of the structure, internal forces of the structural elements were obtained. These results of three structural models were compared with each other and the effectiveness of outrigger and belt truss systems were assessed. For earthquake input, three real earthquake records wereselected. These records were scaled in accordance with theDD2 level earthquake design spectrum defined in Turkish Building Earthquake Standards (2018) and used in the analyses.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEDEOĞLU, İ. Ö., CALAYIR, Y. (2022). Effectiveness of outrigger and belt truss systems on the seismic behaviorof high-rise buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 180–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/566372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Taranath BS (1974) Optimum belt truss location for high-rise structures. Engineering Journal AISC 11:18-21. [2]TaranathBS (1975) Optimum belt truss location for high-rise structures. Structural Engineer 53:345-347. [3]McNabb JB, Muvdi BB (1975) Drift reduction factors for belted high-rise structures. Engineering Journal AISC 12:88-91. [4]McNabb JB, Muvdi BB (1977) Discussion:drift reduction factors for belted high-rise structures. Engineering Journal AISC 14:44-47. [5]Smith BS, Salim I (1981) Parameter study of out-rigger-braced tall building structures. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division 107(10):2001-2014. [6]Nair RS (1998) Belt trusses and basement as “virtual” outriggers for tall buildings. Engineering Journal AISC FourthQuarter: 140-146. [7]Hoenderkamp JCD, Snijder HH (2000) Simplified analysis of façade rigger braced high-rise structures. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings and Special Buildings 9:309-319. [8]Hoenderkamp JCD, Bakker MCB (2003) Analysis of high-rise braced frames with outriggers. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings and Special Buildings 12:335-350. [9]Hoenderkamp JCD (2008) Second outrigger at optimum location on high-rise shear-wall. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings and Special Buildings 17:619-634. [10]Rahgozar R, Ahmedi AR, Hosseini O, Malekinejad M (2011) A simple mathematical model for static analysis of tall buildings with two outrigger-belt truss systems. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 40(1):65-84. [11]Kamath K, Divya N, Rao AU (2012) A study on static and dynamic behavior of outrigger structural system for tall buildings. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and ManagementScience 2(4):15-20. [12]NanduriRK, Suresh B, Hussein I (2013) Optimum position of outrigger system for high-rise reinforced concrete buildings under wind and earthquake loadings. American Journal of Engineering Research 2(8):76-89. [13]Zhou Y, Zhang C, Lu X (2016) An inter-story drift-based parameter analysis of the optimal location of outriggers in tall buildings. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings and Special Buildings 25:215-231. [14]Patil DM, Sangle KK (2016) Seismic behaviour of outrigger braced systems in high rise 2-D steel buildings. The Elsevier Journal Structure 8:1-16. [15]Dedeoğlu İÖ. Lateral load response of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings with outrigger system. MSc Thesis. Ege University, 2017. [16]Calayır Y, Dedeoğlu İÖ. Earthquake response of reinforced concrete tall buildings with o