Journals / Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Dynamic response of a reinforced concrete minaret

Pages
62–72
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end ofthe study, the calculated displacement responses and maximum-minimum principal stresses concentrationsfor the minaret are briefly discussed and illustrated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Minarets are one of the specific structure types used commonly in Islamic Countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three-dimensional (3D)model of the minaret and its modal analysis are performed to obtain analytical frequencies and mode shapesusing ANSYS finite element program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end ofthe study, the calculated displacement responses and maximum-minimum principal stresses concentrationsfor the minaret are briefly discussed and illustrated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Minarets are one of the specific structure types used commonly in Islamic Countries. Many minarets weredamaged or collapsed during catastrophic events like earthquake. During an earthquake to understand theminarets’ behavior are so important since dynamic response of these structures depends on a detailedunderstanding of their structural characteristics, such as geometrical shape, supporting system, mode shapes,natural frequencies and modal damping ratio etc. This paper examines in detail a Turkish style reinforcedconcrete (RC) minaret, its finite element modeling, modal analysis and earthquake analysis. A reinforcedconcrete minaret which is generally built in Turkey is selected as an application. Three-dimensional (3D)model of the minaret and its modal analysis are performed to obtain analytical frequencies and mode shapesusing ANSYS finite element program. The minaret’s linear transient analysis is carried out using the 1992Erzincan earthquake ground motion record to obtain the earthquake behavior of the minaret. At the end ofthe study, the calculated displacement responses and maximum-minimum principal stresses concentrationsfor the minaret are briefly discussed and illustrated.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tonyalı, Z., Günaydın, M. (2022). Dynamic response of a reinforced concrete minaret. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 62–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/566420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Winkler E. Theory of Elasticity and Strength. Dominicus Pague, 1867, Czechoslovakia
  2. Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Altunışık AC, Türker T (2010) Earthquake analysis of reinforced concrete minarets using ambient vibration test results. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 19: 257-273
  3. Sezen H, Acar R, Doğangün A, Livaoglu R (2008) Dynamic analysis and seismic performance of reinforced concrete minarets. Engineering Structures 30: 2253-2264
  4. El-Attar AG, Saleh AM, Osman A. Seismic response of a historical Mamluk style minaret. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures, 2001, Malaga, Spain, 745-754
  5. Higazy EM (2004) Vulnerability of historical minarets investigation of their seismicassessment & retrofitting. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research 9: 59-64
  6. El-Attar AG, Saleh AM, Zaghw AH (2005) Seismic conservation of a slender historical Mamluk-style minaret by passive control techniques. Structural control and health monitoring 12: 157-177
  7. Ertek E. Structural modeling and earthquake analysis of Ottoman minarets, MSc Thesis. Gebze Institute of Technology, Gebze, Turkey, 2009
  8. Doğangün A, Acar R, Sezen H, Livaoglu R (2008) Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures. Bull Earthquake Engineering 6: 505–517
  9. Pena F, Laurenço PB, Mendes N, Oliveira DV (2010) Numerical models for the seismic assessment of an old masonry tower. Engineering Structures 32: 1466-1478
  10. Haciefendioglu K, Birinci F (2011) Stochastic dynamic response of masonry minarets subjected to random blast and earthquake-induced ground motions. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 20: 669–678
  11. Altunisik AC (2011) Dynamic response of masonry minarets strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11: 2011- 2019
  12. Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Türker T, Akköse M, Çoşkun N (2008) Modal analysis, experimental validation and calibration of a historical masonry minaret. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 36(6): 516-524
  13. Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Türker T (2009) Seismic response of a historical masonry minaret using a finite element model updated with operational modal testing. Journal of Vibration and Control 17: 129-149
  14. Portioli F, Mammana O, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM, Krstevska L, Tashkov L, Gramatikov K (2011) Seismic retrofitting of Mustafa Pasha Mosque in Skopje. Finite ele