SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

Effects of manufacturing type on control performance of multiple tunedmass dampers under harmonic excitation

O. ARAZ
V. KAHYA
Pages
117–127
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, a robustness analysis of optimally designed MTMD systems to investigate their performance under errors in the tuned frequencies is also performed in detail.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Using different optimization techniques, the optimum characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) for reducing the dynamic response of primary structure due to various excitations are studied by many researchers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results obtained illustrate that the optimum MTMD-1 and MTMD-4 have nearly the same control performance and provide higher effectiveness than all the other types of MTMDs of the same mass ratio in reducing the displacement response of primary structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, a robustness analysis of optimally designed MTMD systems to investigate their performance under errors in the tuned frequencies is also performed in detail.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Using different optimization techniques, the optimum characteristics of multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) for reducing the dynamic response of primary structure due to various excitations are studied by many researchers. In this paper, the five practical MTMD models are considered which consist of different combinations of the mass, damping, stiffness coefficient and damping ratio in the MTMD. The criteria selected for the optimality is the minimization of the maximum value of the displacement dynamic magnification factor (DMF) of the primary structure with the MTMD system under external harmonic excitation. The optimum parameters of the MTMD systems are investigated using Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP). Results obtained illustrate that the optimum MTMD-1 and MTMD-4 have nearly the same control performance and provide higher effectiveness than all the other types of MTMDs of the same mass ratio in reducing the displacement response of primary structure. Finally, a robustness analysis of optimally designed MTMD systems to investigate their performance under errors in the tuned frequencies is also performed in detail.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAZ, O., KAHYA, V. (2022). Effects of manufacturing type on control performance of multiple tunedmass dampers under harmonic excitation. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 117–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/566422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Den Hartog JP. Mechanical vibrations, McGrawHill, New York, 1956
  2. Tsai HC, Lin GC (1993) Optimum tuned-mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 22(11): 957-973
  3. Wu JJ (2006) Study on the inertia effect of helical spring of the absorber on suppressing the dynamic responses of a beam subjected to a moving load. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 297(3-5): 981-999
  4. Bakre SV, Jangid RS (2007) Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 14(3): 448-470
  5. Leung AYT, Zhang H (2009) Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures 31(3): 715-728
  6. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2013) Mass ratio factor for optimum tuned mass damper strategies. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 71: 68-84
  7. Özsarıyıldız ŞS, Bozer A (2015) Finding optimal parameters of tuned mass dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 24(6): 461-475
  8. Nigdeli SM, Bekdaş G (2017) Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21(3): 912-922
  9. Dell’Elce L, Gourc E, Kerschen G (2018) A robust equal-peak method for uncertain mechanical systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 414: 97-109
  10. Xu K, Igusa T (1992) Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 21(12): 1059-1070
  11. Joshi AS, Jangid RS (1997) Optimum parameters of multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited damped systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 202(5): 657-667
  12. Jangid RS (1999) Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 28(9): 1041-1049
  13. Park J, Reed D (2001) Analysis of uniformly and linearly distributed mass dampers under harmonic and earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures 23(7): 802-814
  14. Poovarodom N, Kanchanosot S, Warnitchai P (2003) Application of non-linear multiple tuned mass dampers to suppress man-induced vibrations of a pedestrian bridge. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32(7): 1117- 1131
  15. Li HN, Ni XL (2007) Optimization of nonuniformly distributed multiple tuned mass damper. Journal of Sound and Vibration 308: 80- 97
  16. Lin CC, Wang JF, Lien CH, Chiang HW, Lin CS (2010) Optimum design and experimental study of multiple tuned mass dampers wi