Journals / Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Seismic performance evaluation of a precast concrete structure with deformation-based limit criterions

Pages
140–150
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The performance evaluation results using average deformations show that there is a significant difference between plastic rotation and reinforcing bar strain performance limits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In precast reinforced concrete buildings, which constitute an important part of the industrial buildings in Turkey, the force flow between the structural elements is provided by beam-column connections with or without transferring moments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In recent years, performance based seismic design and evaluation approach also gained attention which provides numerical estimation of the damage in structural elements subjected to earthquake loading.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The performance evaluation results using average deformations show that there is a significant difference between plastic rotation and reinforcing bar strain performance limits.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In precast reinforced concrete buildings, which constitute an important part of the industrial buildings in Turkey, the force flow between the structural elements is provided by beam-column connections with or without transferring moments. In general, moment resisting beam-column connections with mechanical or emulative components are applied at the mezzanine level. For precast concrete structures, strength-based design is the most common design approach in engineering practice. In recent years, performance based seismic design and evaluation approach also gained attention which provides numerical estimation of the damage in structural elements subjected to earthquake loading. This study presents the performance based seismic assessment of a two-story precast building based on the seismic evaluation requirements of Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018. For this purpose, numerical simulation model has been established by using lumped plasticity models for connections and distributed plasticity models for columns. Strong ground motion records are scaled based on TBEC-2018 acceleration spectrum for a specific location, and nonlinear time history analyses are performed in x and y directions simultaneously. The performance evaluation results using average deformations show that there is a significant difference between plastic rotation and reinforcing bar strain performance limits.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mısır, İ. S., Girgin, S. C., Göksoy, C., Daş, E. (2022). Seismic performance evaluation of a precast concrete structure with deformation-based limit criterions. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 140–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/566365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Atmaca B, Demir S, Günaydın M, Altunışık AC, Hüsem M, Ateş Ş, Adanur S., Angın Z. (2020) Lessons learned from the past earthquakes on building performance in Turkey. J. Struct. Eng. Appl. Mech 3(2):61-84
  2. Saatcioglu M, Mitchell D, Tinawi R, Gardner NJ, Gillies AG, Ghobarah A et al. (2001) The August 17, 1999 Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake-damage to structures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 28(4):715–737
  3. Senel S, Palanci M (2013) Structural aspects and seismic performance of 1-story precast buildings in Turkey. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 27(4):437-449
  4. TBEC (2018) Turkish Earthquake Building Code. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ankara
  5. ASCE SEI Committee 41 (2006) Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, ASCE/SEI 41, Reston, VA, USA
  6. Girgin SC, Misir IS, Kahraman S (2017) Experimental cyclic behavior of precast hybrid beam-column connections with welded components. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials 11(2):229-245
  7. Magliulo G, Fabbrocino G, Manfredi G (2008) Seismic assessment of existing precast industrial buildings using static and dynamic nonlinear analyses. Engineering Structures 30(9):2580-2588
  8. Kayhan AH, Şenel ŞM (2010) Fragility curves for single story precast industrial buildings. Teknik Dergi 21(104):5161-5184 (in Turkish)
  9. Deyanova M, Pampanin S, Nascimbene R (2014) Assessment of single-storey precast concrete industrial buildings with hinged beam-column connections with and without dowels. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, İstanbul
  10. Casotto C, Silva V Crowley H, Pinho R, Nascimbene R (2014) Scenario damage analysis of RC precast industrial structures in Tuscany, Italy. In Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul
  11. TEHM (2018) Turkey Earthquake Hazard Maps Interactive Web Application. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency.
  12. Mısır İS, Girgin SC, Daş D, Göksoy C, Eraslan F, Demirbaş H, Koçbulut H (2019) Force and deformation-based design of precast reinforced concrete industrial buildings within the scope of Turkish Earthquake Code 2019. 5th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (in Turkish)
  13. Wilson EL, Habibullah A (2019) SAP 2000 Software, Version V20.2.0. Computer and Structures, Inc. (CSI), Berkeley
  14. Yüksel E, Özkaynak H, Soydan C, Güllü A (2019) In-plane beha