Journals / Journal of critical and intensive care (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A Survey of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Procedures in The Intensive Care Units of Turkey

Pages
53–59
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More definitive recommendations about PEG procedure and periprocedural care are in need.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is one of the most frequent procedures performed in the intensive care unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The survey, which consisted of 23 questions, had 101 responders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More definitive recommendations about PEG procedure and periprocedural care are in need.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is one of the most frequent procedures performed in the intensive care unit. There is no national study in day about the practice patterns of clinicians so we aimed to evaluate the most common indications and complications associated with PEG feeding and to detect variability in pratices of sedation, antibiotic prophylaxis and nutritional support protocols. Methods: A survey was sent randomly to clinicians working in national intensive care units in Turkey. The survey, which consisted of 23 questions, had 101 responders. Results: The main indication for PEG was prolonged nasogastric tube feeding. The most frequent complication was periostomal leak. The PEG tubes were most frequently placed 4-6 weeks after ICU admission. The majority reinitiated enteral feeding 24 hours after the procedure and about half initiated parenteral nutrition support in the fasting period in order to avoid inadequate calorie intake. Regarding antibiotic use before PEG, 61,4% of clinicians claimed to use prophylactic antibiotics. When asked about pre-procedural antiplatelet drugs, 59% of clinicians reported to cessate acetylsalicylic acid. Conclusion: Among intensive care units, there are differences regarding the placement of PEG tubes and there is no spesific algorythm about the procedure. More definitive recommendations about PEG procedure and periprocedural care are in need.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARITAŞ, A., ÖZKARAKAŞ, H., ŞENOĞLU, N., CİNLETİ, B. A., YAVUZ, T. (2022). A Survey of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Procedures in The Intensive Care Units of Turkey. Journal of critical and intensive care (Online), Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 53–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/562272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kurien M, McAlindon ME,Westaby D, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding. BMJ 2010
  2. c2414. [CrossRef] 2. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014
  3. 7739–51. [CrossRef] 3. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr 2019
  4. 38(1):48–79. [CrossRef] 4. Chaudhry R, Kukreja N, Tse A, et al. Trends and Outcomes of Early Versus Late Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Nationwide Population-based Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2018
  5. 251–7. [CrossRef] 5. Löser C, Aschl G, Hébuterne X, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 2005
  6. 848–61. [CrossRef] 6. Brown K, Cai C, Barreto A, et al. Predictors of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018
  7. 3200–7. [CrossRef] 7. Gundogan K, Yurci A, Coskun R, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in hospitalized patients at a tertiary care center in Turkey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014
  8. 437–40. [CrossRef] 8. Zopf Y, Konturek P, Nuernberger A, et al. Local infection after placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: a prospective study evaluating risk factors. Can J Gastroenterol 2008
  9. 987–91. [CrossRef] 9. Blomberg J, Lagergren J, Martin L, et al. Complications after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012
  10. 737–42. [CrossRef] 10. Cyrany J, Rejchrt S, Kopacova M, et al. Buried bumper syndrome: A complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016
  11. 618–27. [CrossRef] 11. Schneider AS, Schettler A, Markowski A, et al. Complication and mortality rate after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy are low and indication-dependent [Conference presentation: 36th ESPEN Congress in Leipzig, Germany on August 31st - September 3rd, 2013]. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014
  12. 891–8. [CrossRef] 12. Cobell WJ, Hinds AM, Nayani R, et al. Feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: experience of early versus delayed feeding. South Med J 2014
  13. 308–11. [CrossRef] 13. Vyawahare MA, Shirodkar M, Gharat A, et al. A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indian J Gastroenterol 20