Journals / Journal of critical and intensive care (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Sepsis Foci and Procalcitonin Values in Intensive Care Patients

Pages
42–49
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A higher mortality rate was encountered in the infections with two or multiple foci (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Anatomic localizations of septic foci and the relationship between these localizations andprocalcitonin (PCT) in the clinical picture of sepsis/septic shock induced by these foci is not a sufficientlyinvestigated topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to determine the relationship between sepsis foci and procalcitonin values inintensive care patients.Methods: Data of the patients who were admitted in the intensive care unit and diagnosed with sepsis/septic shock between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A higher mortality rate was encountered in the infections with two or multiple foci (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: Anatomic localizations of septic foci and the relationship between these localizations andprocalcitonin (PCT) in the clinical picture of sepsis/septic shock induced by these foci is not a sufficientlyinvestigated topic. We aimed to determine the relationship between sepsis foci and procalcitonin values inintensive care patients.Methods: Data of the patients who were admitted in the intensive care unit and diagnosed with sepsis/septic shock between 2016 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were grouped based onthe localization of the infectious foci as respiratory system, urinary system, blood-catheter, soft tissue andabdominal. Additionally, the patients were grouped also based on number of foci and growing microorganisms.Subsequently, the relationship between septic foci and routine laboratory parameters, primarily PCT, wasinvestigated statistically.Results: Totally 630 infection periods were analyzed in 424 patients who were diagnosed with sepsis/septicshock in the intensive care unit. Incidence of sepsis/septic shock was 36.5% while mortality rate was 65.6% inthese patients. A higher mortality rate was encountered in the infections with two or multiple foci (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEKÇİ, F., KARA, İ., ÜNDAR, H. N., SEVEN, F., KALEM, F., URAL, G. (2022). The Relationship Between Sepsis Foci and Procalcitonin Values in Intensive Care Patients. Journal of critical and intensive care (Online), Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 42–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/562319

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801–10. [CrossRef] 2. Jeganathan N, Yau S, Ahuja N, et al. The characteristics and impact of source of infection on sepsis-related ICU outcomes. J Crit Care 2017;41:170–6. [CrossRef] 3. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Crit Care 2010;14:R15. [CrossRef] 4. Lee H. Procalcitonin as a biomarker of infectious diseases. Korean J Intern Med 2013;28:285–91. [CrossRef] 5. Yan ST, Sun LC, Jia HB, et al. Procalcitonin levels in bloodstream infections caused by different sources and species of bacteria. Am J Emerg Med 2017;35:579–83. [CrossRef] 6. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580–637. [CrossRef] 7. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 2006;34:344– 53. [CrossRef] 8. Stevenson EK, Rubenstein AR, Radin GT, et al. Two decades of mortality trends among patients with severe sepsis: a comparative meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2014;42:625–31. [CrossRef] 9. Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. JAMA 1995;274:968–74. [CrossRef] 10. Leligdowicz A, Dodek PM, Norena M, et al. Association between source of infection and hospital mortality in patients who have septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:1204–13. [CrossRef] 11. Rello J, Ricart M, Mirelis B, et al. Nosocomial bacteremia in a medical-surgical intensive care unit: epidemiologic characteristics and factors influencing mortality in 111 episodes. Intensive Care Med 1994;20:94–8. [CrossRef] 12. Blanco J, Muriel-Bombím A, Sagredo V, et al. Incidence, organ dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis: a Spanish multicentre study. Crit Care 2008;12:R158. [CrossRef] 13. Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, et al. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:206– 17. [CrossRef] 14. Oksuz L, Somer A, Salman N, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differantiating to contamination from bacteremia. Braz J Microbiol 2014;45;1415–21. [CrossRef] 15. Leli C, Ferranti M, M