Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and C reactive protein for infection and sepsis in elderly patients

Pages
2649–2656
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key words: Aged, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, infections, sepsis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Biomarkers are useful for diagnosing infection and sepsis in adults, but data are limited in elderly patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In this single-center and prospective observational study, patients older than 65 years were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key words: Aged, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, infections, sepsis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Biomarkers are useful for diagnosing infection and sepsis in adults, but data are limited in elderly patients. Furthermore, clinical symptoms of infection in elderly patients are usually atypical or unclear. We aimed to assess the usefulness of PCT, CRP, and WBC in distinguishing elderly patients infected with sepsis from infected without sepsis and those with no-infection. We also aimed to find a cut-off value for diagnosing sepsis and infection without sepsis in elderly critically ill patients. Materials and methods: In this single-center and prospective observational study, patients older than 65 years were enrolled. Serum levels of PCT, CRP, and WBC were measured within 24 h. Patients were allocated into sepsis (S), infected without sepsis (IWS), and noinfection (NI) groups. Data were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: We analyzed 188 patients with a mean age of 77.05 ± 7.4 in the study; 95 (50.5%) of them were women. Sixty-four (34%) of whom were classified as IWS, 29 (15%) as S, and 95 (50.5%) as NI group. There were significant differences in the PCT, CRP levels between the IWS and NI, S and NI (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively). The PCT levels were significantly different when the NI group was compared to IWS (p < 0.001) and S (p < 0.001) groups. The CRP levels were also different when the NI group was compared to both IWS (p < 0.001) and S (p < 0.001). The PCT cut-off values were 0.485 μ/L and 1.245 μg/L for the discrimination of patients with IWS and S, respectively. The cut-off values of CRP level were 59.45 mg/L and 57.50 mg/L for infected without sepsis and sepsis, respectively.Conclusion: PCT was found to be a more valuable marker than CRP and WBC for the discrimination of elderly patients with infected without sepsis and sepsis. Key words: Aged, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, infections, sepsis

🔖

Cite This Article

ZİNCİRCİOĞLU, Ç., ÖZKARAKAŞ, H., SARITAŞ, A., ERSAN, G., ROLLAS, K., ŞENOĞLU, N., GÜLDOĞAN, I. K. (2022). Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and C reactive protein for infection and sepsis in elderly patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5, 2649–2656. https://ajindex.com/articles/609336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Flaatten H, De Lange DW, Artigas A, Bin D, Moreno R et al. The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Medicine 2017
  2. 43 (9): 1319-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4718-z 2. Heppner HJ, Sieber C, Walger P, Bahrmann P, Singler K. Infections in the elderly. Critical Care Clinics 2013
  3. 29 (3): 757- 774. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2013.03.016 3. Opal SM, Girard TD, Ely EW. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2005
  4. 41 (7): 504–512. doi: 10.1086/432007 4. Van Duin D. Diagnostic challenges and opportunities in older adults with infectious diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2012
  5. 54 (7): 973–978. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir92 5. Bassettı M, Montero JG, Paıva JA. When antibiotic treatment fails. Intensive Care Medicine 2018
  6. 44 (1): 73-75. doi: 10.1007/ s00134-017-4962-2 6. Bassettı M, Alessandro R, Elda R, Elisabetta D, Maria M et al. Role of procalcitonin in bacteremic patients and its potential use in predicting infection etiology. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 2019
  7. 17 (2): 99-105. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1562335 7. Hoeboer SH, Geestet JV, Nieboer D, Groeneveld ABJ. The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2015
  8. 21 (5): 474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.026 8. Tan M, Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhang L. The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 2019
  9. 120 (4): 5852-5859. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27870 9. Lee SH, Chan RC, Wu JY, Chen HW, Chang SS et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin for bacterial infection in elderly patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2013
  10. 67 (12): 1350-1357. doi: 10.1111/ ijcp.12278 10. Steichen O, Bouvard E, Grateau G, Bailleul S, Capeau J et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in acutely hospitalized elderly patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2009
  11. 28 (12): 1471–1476. doi: 10.1007/ s10096-009-0807-4 11. Ticinesi A, Lauretani F, Nouvenne A, Porro E, Fanelli G et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement in geriatric patients hospitalized for acute infection. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2017
  12. 37 (1): 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.08.026 12. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Internationa