SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Her iki parçası da kırılan bükülebilir penil protez: Olgu sunumu

Fracture of both rods of a malleable penile prosthesis: A case report

Berat Cem ÖZGÜR
Musa EKİCİ
Asım ÖZAYAR
Mehmet ÇİFTÇİ
Hasan BAKIRTAŞ
Pages
154–155
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At 12 months follow-up no trouble with the new prosthesis was occurred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Only a few cases with mechanical failure has been reported with the malleable penile prosthesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 66 year old man, using the AMS 650® (American Medical Systems, Minnesota) malleable penile prosthesis for five years, was admitted with complaining a difficulty in sexual intercourse in the last weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At 12 months follow-up no trouble with the new prosthesis was occurred.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Only a few cases with mechanical failure has been reported with the malleable penile prosthesis. A 66 year old man, using the AMS 650® (American Medical Systems, Minnesota) malleable penile prosthesis for five years, was admitted with complaining a difficulty in sexual intercourse in the last weeks. Preoperative radiology and surgical exploration demonstrated a fracture in both rods. The malfunctioning penile prosthesis was removed, and a new AMS 650® malleable penile prosthesis was implanted. At 12 months follow-up no trouble with the new prosthesis was occurred.

Özet

Literatürde bükülebilir penil protezler ile ilgili sadece birkaç olguda mekanik bozukluk bildirilmiştir. Altmışaltı yaşında AMS 650® (American Medical Systems,Minnesota) marka protezi beş yıldır kullanan erkek hasta son birkaç haftadır olancinsel ilişkide zorluk şikayeti ile kliniğimize başvurdu. Preoperatif görüntüleme ve takiben yapılan cerrahi eksplorasyon ile her iki parçada kırılma tespit edildi. İşlev görmeyen protez yeni bir AMS 650® bükülebilir protez ile değiştirildi. 12 aylık takibimizde yeni protez ile ilgili herhangi bir problem gözlenmedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, B. C., EKİCİ, M., ÖZAYAR, A., ÇİFTÇİ, M., BAKIRTAŞ, H. (2022). Her iki parçası da kırılan bükülebilir penil protez: Olgu sunumu. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 154–155. https://ajindex.com/articles/561496

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Sadeghi-Nejad H. Penile prosthesis surgery: A review of prosthetic devices and associated complications. J Sex Med 2007;4(2):296–309
  2. Jonas U. The history of erectile dysfunction management. Int J Impot Res 2001;13(3):3-7
  3. Bettocchi C, Ditonno P, Palumbo F, Lucarelli G, Garaffa G, Giammusso B,et al Penile Prosthesis: What should we do about complications? Adv Urol 2008:573560
  4. Kim SC, Chang YS, Ahn SY. Bilateral fractures of Hydroflex penile prostheses: an unusual complication. J Korean Med Sci 1994;9(6):505-6
  5. Akand M, Ozayar A, Yaman O, Demirel C. Mechanical failure with malleable penile prosthesis. Urol 2007;70(5):1007.