SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6

Total Laparoskopik Histerektomi ve Abdominal Histerektomi Karşılaştırılması; Klinik Sonuçlar

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared with Abdominal Hysterectomy; Clinical Outcomes

Erson AKSU
Hatice ÇALIŞKAN
Didem AKKUŞ
Remzi ABALİ
Cem CELİK
Nicel TASDEMİR
Pages
490–493
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Duration of hospital stay was statistically shorterin TLH group compared to the TAH group (3.93±0.70 vs 5.26±1.63 day).Discussion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, compared to laparotomy regardingequal outcomes and lower perioperative morbidity, improvement of quality oflife, shorter hospital stay and faster return to activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this study was to confirm the positive intraoperative andpostoperative outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and totalabdominal hysterectomy (TAH).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: We presented surgicalprocedures performed at Namık Kemal University Faculty of Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between September 2010 andDecember 2012, 47 patients who underwent TLH and 30 patients whounderwent TAH were included in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Duration of hospital stay was statistically shorterin TLH group compared to the TAH group (3.93±0.70 vs 5.26±1.63 day).Discussion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, compared to laparotomy regardingequal outcomes and lower perioperative morbidity, improvement of quality oflife, shorter hospital stay and faster return to activity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to confirm the positive intraoperative andpostoperative outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and totalabdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Material and Method: We presented surgicalprocedures performed at Namık Kemal University Faculty of Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between September 2010 andDecember 2012, 47 patients who underwent TLH and 30 patients whounderwent TAH were included in the present study. Results: Operating timein TLH group was significantly longer than in the TAH group (202.56±61.53vs 138.06±40.52 min). There were no significant differences between the twogroups regarding complications, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperativebleeding. We observed no differences in reoperation and transfusion ratesbetween the two groups. Duration of hospital stay was statistically shorterin TLH group compared to the TAH group (3.93±0.70 vs 5.26±1.63 day).Discussion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, compared to laparotomy regardingequal outcomes and lower perioperative morbidity, improvement of quality oflife, shorter hospital stay and faster return to activity.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, total laparoskopik histerektomi (TLH) ve total abdominal histerektomi (TAH) nin intraoperatif ve postoperatif üstünlüklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma Namık Kemal Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi,Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalında Eylül 2010 veAralık 2012 tarihleri arasında 47 TLH ve 30 TAH yapılan hasta sunulmuştur.Bulgular: Sonuç olarak operasyon süresi TLH yapılan hastalarda TAH uygulanan hastalara oranla daha uzundu ( 202.56±61.53; 138.06±40.52 dakika).İki grup arasında intraoperative komplikasyon açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Reoperasyon ve kan transfüzyonu gerekliliği yapılan operasyondan bağımsızdı. Hospitalizasyon süresi TLH yapılan olgularda anlamlı ölçüde kısalmıştı ( 3.93±0.70 ; 5.26±1.63 gün). Tartışma: Laparoskopik histerektomi laparatomiyle kıyaslandığında daha düşük perioperatif morbidite,daha iyi yaşam standardı ve kısa süreli hospitalizasyon sonrası günlük aktivitelere hızlı dönüş sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, E., ÇALIŞKAN, H., AKKUŞ, D., ABALİ, R., CELİK, C., TASDEMİR, N. (2022). Total Laparoskopik Histerektomi ve Abdominal Histerektomi Karşılaştırılması; Klinik Sonuçlar. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6, 490–493. https://ajindex.com/articles/561196

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Reich H. New techniques in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1989;3(3):655–81
  2. Kluivers KB, Johnson NP, Chien P, Vierhout ME, Bongers M, Mol BW. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136(1):3–8
  3. Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144(1):3–7
  4. WuJM,Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(5):1091–5
  5. Boggess JF. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg 2007;1 (1):69–74
  6. Lenihan Jr JP, Kovanda C, Cammarano C. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to em- ployers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190(6):1714–20
  7. Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12(4):312–17
  8. Sokol AI, Chuang K, Milad MP. Risk factors for conversion to laparotomy during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10(4):469–73
  9. Boike GM, Elfstrand EP, DelPriore G, Schumock D, Holley HS, Lurain JR. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparision with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168(6):1690–701
  10. Jahan S, Das TR, Mahmud N, Mondol SK, Habib SH, Saha S. A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31(3):254-7
  11. Gemignani ML, Curtin JP, Zelmanovich J, Patel DA, Venkatraman E, Barakat RR. Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges. Gynecol Oncol 1999;73(1):5-11
  12. Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominalsurgery in patients with endometrial cancer—a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2001;80(2):239-44
  13. Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Total laparo- scopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2004;