Journals / Journal of Contemporary Medicine / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 6

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Polikistik Over Sendromu Fenotipleri Arasında Kardiyovasküler ve Metabolik Risk Profillerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
307–314
Publication Date
2025-11-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although glucose and overall HbA1c were similar between PCOS and controls, HbA1c was significantly higher in the PCO+OA subgroup compared with HA+OA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder affecting 5–10% of women of reproductive age and is increasingly recognized as a female-specific cardiometabolic condition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 240 women diagnosed with PCOS based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria and 116 healthy controls aged 18–42 years were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although glucose and overall HbA1c were similar between PCOS and controls, HbA1c was significantly higher in the PCO+OA subgroup compared with HA+OA.
🔬Design:Text.Serial.Journal
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Polikistik over sendromu · fenotipler · insülin direnci

Abstract

Aim: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine disorder affecting 5–10% of women of reproductive age and is increasingly recognized as a female-specific cardiometabolic condition. Although metabolic risk factors such as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension are well established in PCOS, their distribution across distinct phenotypes remains controversial. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 240 women diagnosed with PCOS based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria and 116 healthy controls aged 18–42 years were evaluated. Patients with PCOS were categorized into four phenotypes: (i) hyperandrogenism + oligo/anovulation + polycystic ovaries (HA+OA+PCO), (ii) hyperandrogenism + oligo/anovulation (HA+OA), (iii) hyperandrogenism + polycystic ovaries (HA+PCO), and (iv) polycystic ovaries + oligo/anovulation (PCO+OA). Anthropometric measurements, hormonal profiles, lipid panels, glucose-insulin parameters, and HOMA-IR indices were compared between groups. Results: Compared with controls, women with PCOS had significantly higher triglycerides, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, total testosterone, DHEAS, and LH/FSH ratio, while HDL cholesterol was lower (all p<0.05). Waist-to-hip ratio was elevated in the PCOS group despite similar BMI. Mean systolic BP was comparable, whereas diastolic BP was slightly lower in PCOS; both SBP and DBP varied significantly across phenotypes. Lipid and hormone profiles did not differ among subgroups. Although glucose and overall HbA1c were similar between PCOS and controls, HbA1c was significantly higher in the PCO+OA subgroup compared with HA+OA. Conclusion: PCOS is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk factors independent of phenotype. These findings underscore the need for early cardiometabolic screening in all women with PCOS, while larger multicenter studies are warranted to delineate subtle inter-phenotypic variations.

Özet

Amaç: Polikistik over sendromu (PCOS), üreme çağındaki kadınların %5–10’unu etkileyen heterojen bir endokrin bozukluktur ve giderek kadınlara özgü bir kardiyometabolik durum olarak tanınmaktadır. İnsülin direnci, dislipidemi ve hipertansiyon gibi metabolik risk faktörleri PCOS’ta iyi tanımlanmış olsa da, bunların farklı fenotipler arasındaki dağılımı tartışmalıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 2003 Rotterdam kriterlerine göre PCOS tanısı almış 240 kadın ve 18–42 yaş aralığında 116 sağlıklı kontrol değerlendirildi. PCOS’lu hastalar dört fenotipe ayrıldı: (i) hiperandrojenizm + oligo/anovulasyon + polikistik overler (HA+OA+PCO), (ii) hiperandrojenizm + oligo/anovulasyon (HA+OA), (iii) hiperandrojenizm + polikistik overler (HA+PCO), (iv) polikistik overler + oligo/anovulasyon (PCO+OA). Gruplar arasında antropometrik ölçümler, hormonal profiller, lipid panelleri, glukoz-insülin parametreleri ve HOMA-IR indeksleri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Kontrollerle karşılaştırıldığında, PCOS’lu kadınlarda trigliserid, açlık insülini, HOMA-IR, total testosteron, DHEAS ve LH/FSH oranı anlamlı derecede yüksek; HDL kolesterol ise daha düşüktü (tümü p<0,05). VKİ benzer olmasına rağmen bel/kalça oranı PCOS grubunda daha yüksekti. Ortalama sistolik kan basıncı benzerken, diyastolik kan basıncı PCOS’ta biraz daha düşüktü; hem SBP hem de DBP fenotipler arasında anlamlı farklılık gösterdi. Lipid ve hormon profilleri alt gruplar arasında farklılık göstermedi. Glukoz ve HbA1c genel olarak PCOS ve kontroller arasında benzer olsa da, HbA1c PCO+OA alt grubunda HA+OA’ya göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti. Sonuç: PCOS, fenotipten bağımsız olarak olumsuz kardiyometabolik risk faktörleri ile ilişkilidir. Bu bulgular, tüm PCOS’lu kadınlarda erken kardiyometabolik taramanın önemini vurgulamaktadır. İnter-fenotipik ince farklılıkları ortaya koymak için daha geniş çok merkezli çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aksu, E., Gül, A. (2025). Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Profiles Across Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 6, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1794476

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Deswal R, Narwal V, Dang A, Pundir CS. The prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome: a brief systematic review. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020;13(4):261-71
  2. Melson E, Davitadze M, Malhotra K, Mousa A, Teede H, Kempegowda P, et al. A systematic review of models of care for polycystic ovary syndrome highlights the gap in the literature, especially in developing countries. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1217468
  3. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602-18
  4. Carmina E, Nasrallah MP, Guastella E, Lobo RA. Characterization of metabolic changes in the phenotypes of women with polycystic ovary syndrome in a large Mediterranean population from Sicily. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019;91(4):553-60
  5. Baptiste CG, Battista MC, Trottier A, Baillargeon JP. Insulin and hyperandrogenism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;122(1-3):42-52
  6. Luque-Ramírez M, Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome as a paradigm for prehypertension, prediabetes, and preobesity. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16(12):500
  7. Moran L, Teede H. Metabolic features of the reproductive phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(4):477-88
  8. Shroff R, Syrop CH, Davis W, Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Risk of metabolic complications in the new PCOS phenotypes based on the Rotterdam criteria. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(5):1389-95
  9. Guastella E, Longo RA, Carmina E. Clinical and endocrine characteristics of the main polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2197-201
  10. Wiltgen D, Spritzer PM. Variation in metabolic and cardiovascular risk in women with different polycystic ovary syndrome phenotypes. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2493-6
  11. Matthews D.R. et al. (1985). Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia, 28(7): 412–419
  12. Radikova Z. et al. (2006). Insulin sensitivity indices: a proposal of cut-off points for simple identification of insulin-resistant subjects. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 114(5): 249–256
  13. Barrea L, Frias-Toral E, Verde L, Ceriani F, Cucalón G, Garcia-Velasquez E, et al. PCOS and nutritional approaches: differences between lean and obese phenotype. Metab Open. 2021;12:100123
  14. Tosi F, Di Sarra D, Kaufma