SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Chemical Metrology / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Proficiency testing for determination of pH and electrolytic conductivity in water and soil samples

Emrah UYSAL
Lokman LİV
Fatma AKÇADAĞ
Pages
29–38
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the results of the participants, they have a chance to improve the accuracy and reliability oftheir measurement results as observing the performances of other laboratories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: According to ISO 17025:2017, the testing laboratories are required to confirm the measurementaccuracy with proficiency testings or international comparisons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study,the preparation and analysis of the samples according to BS EN ISO 10523:2012, ISO 7888:1985, ISO10390:2005 and ISO 11265:1996 and the evaluation of the results according to ISO 17043:2010 were carriedout. pH and electrolytic conductivity (EC) values were determined by a pH meter and a conductivity meter forthis study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the results of the participants, they have a chance to improve the accuracy and reliability oftheir measurement results as observing the performances of other laboratories.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: According to ISO 17025:2017, the testing laboratories are required to confirm the measurementaccuracy with proficiency testings or international comparisons. For this purpose, the proficiency testings for pHand conductivity measurements in water and soil are organized by TUBITAK UME twice a year. In this study,the preparation and analysis of the samples according to BS EN ISO 10523:2012, ISO 7888:1985, ISO10390:2005 and ISO 11265:1996 and the evaluation of the results according to ISO 17043:2010 were carriedout. pH and electrolytic conductivity (EC) values were determined by a pH meter and a conductivity meter forthis study. Based on the results of the participants, they have a chance to improve the accuracy and reliability oftheir measurement results as observing the performances of other laboratories.

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, E., LİV, L., AKÇADAĞ, F. (2022). Proficiency testing for determination of pH and electrolytic conductivity in water and soil samples. Journal of Chemical Metrology, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 29–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/560764

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). (1996). Trace elements in human nutrition and health, WHO, Switzerland
  2. Queeney, K (2007). The importance of pH measurement in assuring product quality. https://www.manufacturing.net/article/2007/06/importance-pH-measurement-assuring-product-quality Accessed 13.05.2019 [3] P. Spitzer and B. Werner, (2002). Improved realibility of pH measurements, Anal. Bioanal. Chem, 374, 787-795
  3. H. D. Jensen (2000). Towards and improved primary standard for electrolytic conductivity. DFM, Denmark
  4. P. Bedson, T.J. Farrant, S. L. R. Ellison and V. J. Barwick (2009). Practical statistics for the analytical scientist: A bench guide, Royal Society Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2005). ISO 13528:2005 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, ISO, Switzerland
  6. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2010). ISO/IEC 17043:2010 Conformity assessment - General requirements for proficiency testing, ISO, Switzerland
  7. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2005). ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO, Switzerland
  8. R. E. Lawn, M.Thompson and F.R. Walker (1997). Proficiency testing in analytical chemistry, Royal Society Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  9. T. Näykki, L. Jalukse, I. Helm and I. Leito (2013). Dissolved oxygen concentration interlaboratory comparison: What can we learn? Water, 5, 420-442
  10. R. P. Buck, S. Rondinini, A.K. Covington, F.G.K. Baucke, C.M.A. Brett, M.F. Camões, M.J.T. Milton, T. Mussini, R. Naumann, K.W. Pratt, P. Spitzer and G.S. Wilson (2002). Measurement of pH. Definition, standards, and procedures, Pure Appl. Chem., 74, 2169-2200
  11. British Standards Institution (BSI). (2012). BS EN ISO 10523:2012 Water quality - Determination of pH, ISO, Switzerland
  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1985). ISO 7888:1985 Water quality - Determination of electrical conductivity, ISO, Switzerland
  13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2005). ISO 10390:2005 Soil quality - Determination of pH, ISO, Switzerland
  14. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1996). ISO 11265:1996 Soil quality - Determination of the specific electrical conductivity, ISO, Switzerland
  15. E. Uysal, F. Akçadağ and N. Tokman (2014). Proficiency testing for determina