Journals / Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11

Pre‑Service Science Teachers'ʹ Pedagogical Orientations of Science Inquiry Continuum

Pages
1–36
Publication Date
2015-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that when it is considered that the pre-­‐‑service teachers were more oriented in a teacher-­‐‑centered pedagogy; changes must be made in theirinquiry experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the pedagogical orientation of a group of Turkish pre-­‐‑service teachers towards inquiry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants in the study were 587 pre-­‐‑service science teachersenrolled in five state universities in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that when it is considered that the pre-­‐‑service teachers were more oriented in a teacher-­‐‑centered pedagogy; changes must be made in theirinquiry experience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:science inquiry · inquiry teaching · levels of inquiry

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the pedagogical orientation of a group of Turkish pre-­‐‑service teachers towards inquiry. The participants in the study were 587 pre-­‐‑service science teachersenrolled in five state universities in Turkey. The researcher developed a Pedagogy of Science InquiryContinuum Test (PoSICT). The PoSICT consists of six items designated as the six inquirycharacteristics of problem/question, procedures/design, results analysis, conclusions, alternativeconclusions, results communication. Each item of the test requires choosing one out of four choicesthat correspond to changing levels of inquiry, starting from confirmation inquiry and ending withopen inquiry. The results of the research showed that the pre-­‐‑service teachers’ orientations were at thestructured inquiry level. Even though this orientation of the pre-­‐‑service teachers did not correspond toa lower level of inquiry such as the confirmation level, the study found that the characteristics thatwould require the student to think independently were given to the student by the teacher. Thereasons the pre-­‐‑service teachers gave for choosing their inquiry levels were students'ʹ prior knowledge,the student'ʹs role and the teacher'ʹs role. These results indicate that when it is considered that the pre-­‐‑service teachers were more oriented in a teacher-­‐‑centered pedagogy; changes must be made in theirinquiry experience.

Özet

The purpose of this study is to determine the pedagogical orientation of a group of Turkish pre-­‐‑service teachers towards inquiry. The participants in the study were 587 pre-­‐‑service science teachersenrolled in five state universities in Turkey. The researcher developed a Pedagogy of Science InquiryContinuum Test (PoSICT). The PoSICT consists of six items designated as the six inquirycharacteristics of problem/question, procedures/design, results analysis, conclusions, alternativeconclusions, results communication. Each item of the test requires choosing one out of four choicesthat correspond to changing levels of inquiry, starting from confirmation inquiry and ending withopen inquiry. The results of the research showed that the pre-­‐‑service teachers’ orientations were at thestructured inquiry level. Even though this orientation of the pre-­‐‑service teachers did not correspond toa lower level of inquiry such as the confirmation level, the study found that the characteristics thatwould require the student to think independently were given to the student by the teacher. Thereasons the pre-­‐‑service teachers gave for choosing their inquiry levels were students'ʹ prior knowledge,the student'ʹs role and the teacher'ʹs role. These results indicate that when it is considered that the pre-­‐‑service teachers were more oriented in a teacher-­‐‑centered pedagogy; changes must be made in theirinquiry experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

FEYZİOĞLU, E. Y. (2015). Pre‑Service Science Teachers'ʹ Pedagogical Orientations of Science Inquiry Continuum. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 11, 1–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/55799

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). The liberal art of science: agenda for action: Washington, DC. Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807-­‐‑830). London: Routledge. Arslan, A. (2014). Transition between open and guided inquiry instruction. Procedia -­‐‑ Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 407-­‐‑412. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7). 30-­‐‑33. Biggers, M. & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: Preservice elementary teachers’ ideas about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205-­‐‑2229. Bodzin, A. M. & Beerer, K. M. (2003). Promoting inquiry based science instruction: The validation of the Science Teacher Inquiry Rubric (STIR). Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15 (2), 39-­‐‑49. Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52-­‐‑58. Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-­‐‑1959.
  2. Chabalengula, V. M. & Mumba, F. (2012). Inquiry-­‐‑based science education: A scenario on zambia'ʹs high school science curriculum. Science Education International, 23(4), 307-­‐‑327. Cheung, D. (2007). Facilitating chemistry teachers to implement inquiry-­‐‑based laboratory work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 107-­‐‑130. Cheung, D. (2011). Teacher beliefs about implementing guided-­‐‑inquiry laboratory experiments for secondary school chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1462-­‐‑ 1468. Chinn, C. A. & Hmelo-­‐‑Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: introduction to the special section. Science Education, 86, 171-­‐‑174. Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B. A., Mugaloglu, E. Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching test: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, 36 (13), 2265-­‐‑2288. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morr