SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Ahmet AKIN
Ümran AKIN
Banu YILDIZ
Pages
49–62
Publication Date
2014-07-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The responsibility lies with the authors of papers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education (BUJFED) is a international refereed journal that is published two times a year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education (BUJFED) is a international refereed journal that is published two times a year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The responsibility lies with the authors of papers
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler akademik potansiyel inanç ve duyguları · geçerlik · güvenirlik

Abstract

Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education (BUJFED) is a international refereed journal that is published two times a year. The responsibility lies with the authors of papers

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğini (Patall, Awad, & Cestone, 2014) Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 355 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçları, 10 madde ve iki alt boyuttan oluşan modelin (akademik potansiyel memnuniyeti ve algılanan akademik potansiyel) iyi uyum verdiğini göstermiştir (x²= 59.60, sd= 29, RMSEA= .056, CFI= .97, IFI= .98, GFI= .97, SRMR= .036). Ölçeğin iç tutarlık güvenirlik katsayıları, akademik potansiyel memnuniyeti alt ölçeği için .75, algılanan akademik potansiyel alt ölçeği için .81 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular, ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin sağlandığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, A., AKIN, Ü., YILDIZ, B. (2014). Akademik Potansiyele Yönelik İnanç ve Duygular Ölçeğinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 49–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/55637

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anderson, C. A., & Jennings, D. L. (1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attributing failure to ineffective strategies. Journal of Personality, 48, 393–405.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Beane, J. A. (1994). Cluttered terrain: The schools’ interest in the self. In T. M. Brinpthaupt & R. P. Lipka (Eds.), Changing the self: Philosophies, techniques, and experiences. SUNY Series: Studying the self (pp. 69–87). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  3. Beery, R. G. (1975). Fear of failure in the student experience. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 54, 190–203.
  4. Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405–417.
  5. Berzonsky, M. D., & Kuk, L. S. (2005). Identity style, psychosocial maturity, and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 235–247.
  6. Berzonsky, M. D. (1990). Self-construction over the life span: A process perspective on identity formation. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 155–186).
  7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  8. Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research, 4, 268–282.
  9. Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in causal attributions by college students of performance on course examinations. Current Psychology, 17(4), 346-358.
  10. Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139–153.
  11. Boyd, V. S., Patricia, H. F., Kandell, J. J., & Lucas, M. S. (2003). Relationship between identity processing style and academic success in undergraduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 155–167.
  12. Cadely, H., Pittman, J. F., Kerpelman, J. L., & Adler-Baeder, F. (2011). The role of identity styles and academic possible selves on academic outcomes for high school students. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 11, 267–288.
  13. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Dillon, R. L., & Tinsley, C. H. (2008). How near-misses influence decision making under risk: A missed opportunity for learning. Management Science, 8, 1425–1440.
  15. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psyc