Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 27

Britanya daki Asyalı Gençlik, Kent Protestoları ve Yerel Aidiyetler

British Asian Youth, Urban Protests and Local Belongingness

Pages
369–385
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is attimes expressed through territorialized local politics and actions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The local space has a constituting impact on the construction of identities andthe feeling of belongingness particularly of the descendants of migrants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their understanding of locality incorporates various thoughintertwined articulations of socially, culturally and emotionally marked spatial space.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is attimes expressed through territorialized local politics and actions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The local space has a constituting impact on the construction of identities andthe feeling of belongingness particularly of the descendants of migrants. In this paper Idiscuss the ways in which local spatial experiences are implicated in the process of identityformation of British Asian youth in Bradford. The youth, experience, demarcate, andutilise the local space for their self-definition. The discussion considers the contextualityof the positioning of those youth within the culturally, socially and territorially markedurban space. The youth define their belongingness according to their experiences ofand within this local space. Their understanding of locality incorporates various thoughintertwined articulations of socially, culturally and emotionally marked spatial space. Theboundaries of those localities are blurred or overlapping. They are constructed by theyouth in context, as are their identifications with different notions of locality. This is attimes expressed through territorialized local politics and actions.

Özet

Yerel mekânın özellikle göçmen kökenli gençlerin aidiyet duyguları ve kimlik in- şaları üzerinde önemli bir etkisi vardır. Bu makalede yerel mekân deneyimlerinin Britan- ya-Asyalı gençlerin kimlik oluşum sürecini nasıl etkilediğini tartışacağım. Gençler yerelmekânı deneyimlemekte, sınırlarını belirlemekte ve öz-tanımları için kullanmaktadırlar.Tartışma bu gençlerin kültürel, sosyal ve bölgesel olarak belirlenmiş bir mekân içindebağlamsal konumlanmalarını da içermektedir. Gençler aidiyetlerini bu yerel mekândakideneyimlerine göre tanımlamaktadırlar. Onların mekân anlayışları farklı ama iç içe geçmişsosyal, kültürel ve duygusal öğelerle yüklenmiş ifadeleri kapsamaktadır. Bu mekânların sı- nırları bulanıktır ve birbirleriyle örtüşürler. Bu farklı mekânlar ve mekânlarla özdeşleşme- ler gençler tarafından bağlamsal olarak inşa edilirler. Bu durum bazen bölgeselleştirilmiş(territorialized) yerel politikalar ve eylemler yoluyla ifade edilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEY, Ü. (2022). Britanya daki Asyalı Gençlik, Kent Protestoları ve Yerel Aidiyetler. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 27, 369–385. https://ajindex.com/articles/554960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alam, M.Y. and Husband, C. (2006). British-Pakistani Men f rom Bradf ord: Linking Narratives to Policy. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Alexander C., Edwards, R. and Temple, B. (2007). Contesting cultural communities: Language, ethnicity and citizenship in Britain, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 339 (5), 783-800.
  2. Alexander, C. (2005). Embodying Violence: “Riots”, Dis/order and the Private Lives of “the Asian Gang”, in C. Alexander and C. Knowles (Eds.), Making Race Matter: Bodies, Sp ace and Identity. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Alleyne, B. (2002). An idea of community and its discontents: towards a more reflexive sense of belonging in multicultural Britain, Ethnic and Racial Studies 25(4), 607-627.
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  4. Back, L. (1996) New ethnicities and urban culture: Racisms and multiculture in y oung lives. London: UCL Press.
  5. Bagguley, P. and Hussain, Y. (2008). Riotous citizens: Ethnic conf lict in multicultural Britain. Burlington: Ashgate. Barker, C. (2004). The SA GE dictionary of cultural studies. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage. Benyon, J. (1987). “Interpretations of civil disorder” in J. Solomos and J. Benyon (Eds), The Roots of Urban Unrest. Oxford: Pergamon. Bhatt, C. (1997). Liberation and Purity: Race, new Religious Movements and the Ethics of Postmodernity. London and New York: Routledge. Burlet, S. and Reid, H. (1998). A gendered uprising: political representation and minority ethnic communities, Ethnic and Racial Studies 21(2), 270-287.
  6. Cantle, T. (2001) Community cohesion: A report of the independent review team, Home Office, London: HMSO. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: Cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. London: Edward Arnold Publishers. City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council. (2001).
  7. Census. Cohen, A. P. (1985). The sy mbolic construction of community. London and New York: Routledge. Denham, J. (2001). Building cohesive communities: A rep ort of the ministerial group on p ublic order and community cohesion. Home Office, London: HMSO. Dufoix, S. (2005). More than riots: A question of sp heres. http://riotsfrance. ssrc.org/Dufoix/(last accessed: 8.2.2012).
  8. Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. P. Rabinow (Ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin. Fortier, A. (2005). Pride politics and multiculturalist citizenship. Ethnic and Racial Studies,