SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Relationships Between Reasoning, Verbal Working Memory, and Language in Children with Early Cochlear Implantation: A Mediation Effect

Hatice Akçakaya
Filiz Aslan
Murat Doğan
Esra Yücel
Pages
485–509
Publication Date
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, activities to improve verbal working memory and receptive and expressive language skills might improve reasoning skills of children with cochlear implants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between reasoning, working memory, and language in children with cochlear implants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were twenty five children with deaf who had cochlear implant surgery before the age of 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, activities to improve verbal working memory and receptive and expressive language skills might improve reasoning skills of children with cochlear implants.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Reasoning · verbal working memory · cochlear implant

Özet

Öz The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between reasoning, working memory, and language in children with cochlear implants. A battery of tests of language, working memory, reasoning tasks, and speech perception tests was administered to each child. The participants were twenty five children with deaf who had cochlear implant surgery before the age of 3. Parallel Mediation Analysis was conducted. The cause of reasoning is the working memory, however this effect is shown with the indirect effects of receptive and expressive language skills. As a result, activities to improve verbal working memory and receptive and expressive language skills might improve reasoning skills of children with cochlear implants.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akçakaya, H., Aslan, F., Doğan, M., Yücel, E. (2018). Relationships Between Reasoning, Verbal Working Memory, and Language in Children with Early Cochlear Implantation: A Mediation Effect. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 485–509. https://ajindex.com/articles/55198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 Akçakaya, H. (2015). Evaluation of verbal working memory of early cochlear implanted children and its relationship with language. (Master's thesis), Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara. Retrieved from: http://www.openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/735
  2. Akoğlu, G., & Acarlar, F. (2014). Investigation of Turkish Nonword Repetition List for 3-9 years children. Education and Science, 39(173), 13-24. Retrieved from: http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2398/692
  3. Archibald, L. M. (2013). The language, working memory, and other cognitive demands of verbal tasks. Topics in Language Disorders, 33(3), 190-207. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e31829dd8af Aslan, F. (2016). Auditory reasoning skills in early and late cochlear implanted school aged children. (Doctoral dissertation), Hacettepe University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
  4. AuBuchon, A. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Kronenberger, W. G. (2015). Short-term and working memory impairments in early-implanted, long-term cochlear implant users are independent of audibility and speech production. Ear and hearing, 36(6), 733-737. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000189 Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of communication disorders, 36(3), 189-208. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
  5. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action (Vol. 45). New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.003.0002 Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158-173. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. Retrieved from: http://webcom.upmf-grenoble.fr/LIP/Perso/DMuller/GSERM/Articles/Journal%20of%20Personality%20and%20Social%20Psychology%201986%20Baron.pdf
  6. Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., et al., (2001). Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2), 264-