Journals / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?

İnsizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Tekniği Güvenli Bir Yöntem midir?

Pages
342–346
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be performed by payingattention to wound problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgicalprocedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor andaffect quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated the results of thistechnique in terms of wound infection and recurrence.Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CStechnique between February 2012 and February 2014 wereincluded in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be performed by payingattention to wound problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgicalprocedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor andaffect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whethercomponent separation (CS) technique is a safe method inpatients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of thistechnique in terms of wound infection and recurrence.Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CStechnique between February 2012 and February 2014 wereincluded in the study. Demographic data, body mass index(BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, defectsize, wound complications and recurrences after one-yearfollow-up were evaluated.Results: Seventeen patients were female and 13 were male.The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years (range: 29-76). Themean BMI of the patients was 26.8 kg/m2 (range: 20.5-32.9).The mean hernia transverse diameter was 9.6 cm (range: 6.5-23). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients. Woundproblems were observed in six of 30 patients in CS repair, andrecurrence was observed in three of these patients. Recurrencewas observed in only one of the remaining 24 patients withouta wound problem. Recurrence was found to be statisticallyrelated to wound problem. There was also a significantrelationship between BMI, hernia transverse diameter, ASAscore and recurrence.Conclusion: In selected cases, CS technique is a safe techniquefor incisional hernia repair. It can be performed by payingattention to wound problems.

Özet

Amaç: Abdominal cerrahi girişimler sonrasında ortaya çıkan insizyonel herniler önemli oranda işgücü kaybına, morbiditeye neden olur, yaşam kalitesini etkiler. Bu çalışmada insizyonel hernili hastalarda Komponent Seperasyon (KS) tekniğinin güvenli bir yöntem olup olmadığını araştırdık. Bu tekniğin; yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve nüks açısından sonuçlarını değerlendirdik. Yöntemler: Şubat 2012- Şubat 2014 tarihleri arasında hastanemizde KS tekniği ile ameliyat edilen 30 insizyonel herni olgusu çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik bilgileri, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), Amerikan Anesteziyoloji Derneği (ASA) skoru, defektin boyu, yara komplikasyonları ve bir yıllık takip sonrası nüksler değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 17’si kadın, 13’ü erkekti. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 54,8 (29-76) idi. Hastaların VKİ ortalaması 26,8 kg/ m2 (20,5-32,9) idi. Bu hastaların ortalama fıtık transvers çapı 9,6 cm (6,5-23) idi. Hastaların hiçbirinde mortalite izlenmedi. KS onarımında 30 hastanın altısında yara yeri problemleri gözlenirken bu hastaların üçünde nüks gözlendi. Yara yeri problemi olmayan 24 olgunun ise sadece birinde nüks gözlendi. Yara yeri problemi olan hastalarda nüks istatistiksel olarak ilişkili bulundu. VKİ, fıtık transvers çapı yüksekliği ve ASA skoru ile de nüks arasında anlamlı ilişki saptandı. Sonuç: İnsizyonel herni onarımında uygun olgularda komponent separasyon tekniği güvenli bir tekniktir. Yara problemlerine dikkat edilerek uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLECİK, T., ARSLAN, U. (2022). Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 342–346. https://ajindex.com/articles/551973

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Van’t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, et al. Prevention of adhesion to prostetic mesh: comparison of barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 123-8
  2. Greenawalt KE, Butler TJ, Rowe EA, Finneral AC, Garlick DS, Burns JW. Evaluation of Sepramesh Biosurgical Composite in a Rabbit Hernia Repair Model. J Surg Res 2000; 94: 92-8
  3. Felemovicius I, Bonsack ME, Hagerman G, Delaney JP. Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198: 543-8
  4. Kendall SW, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ. Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 705-7
  5. Switzer NJ, Dykstra MA, Gill RS, Lim S, Lester E, de Gara C, et al. Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 787-95
  6. Sayek İ. 3. baskı Barış Tıp kitapevi, Ankara 2004. p. 1518
  7. Yahchouchy-Chouillard E, Aura T, Picone O, Etienne JC, Fingerhut A. Incisional Hernias I. Related Risk Factors. Dig Surg 2003; 20: 3-9
  8. Read RC. Development of inguinal herniorraphy. Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64: 185-96
  9. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 519-26
  10. Aksoy E, Çakmak A, Orozakunov E, Gürel M. Polipropilen meshlerin dokuya tespitinde kullanılan polipropilen dikiş, titanyum zımba ve nitinol çapa’nın kopma kuvvetlerinin karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2009; 62: 39-43
  11. Skandalakis LJ, Gadacz TR, Mansberger AR, Mitchell WE, Colborn GL, Skandalakis JE. Modern Hernia Repair, The embryological and anatomical basis of Surgery. NewYork: Parthenon; 1996
  12. Burger JWA, Luijendijk RW, Hop WCJ, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EGG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 578-85
  13. Trivellini G, Bagni CM, Sollini A, Senni M, Leone S, Contessini Avesani E. Repair of giant hernias using more prosthesis. Hernia 2001; 5: 124-8. 14. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, Bemelmans MH, de Jong D, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, et al. Components separation technique for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 32-7
  14. Jernigan TW, Fabian TC, Croce MA, Moore N, Pritchard FE, Minard G, et al. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defects: acute and long