✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
In the literature, we did not find any case having patent urachus and stone together, without urachal cyst.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Authors present an 8-years-old boy with a patent urachus containing a stone at the mid-portion of the tractus.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Authors present an 8-years-old boy with a patent urachus containing a stone at the mid-portion of the tractus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the literature, we did not find any case having patent urachus and stone together, without urachal cyst.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Authors present an 8-years-old boy with a patent urachus containing a stone at the mid-portion of the tractus. In the literature, we did not find any case having patent urachus and stone together, without urachal cyst.
Özet
Patent urakus traktusunda taş içeren 8 yaşındaki bir erkek çocuk sunulmaktadır. Dünya literatürü incelendiğinde daha önce urakal kist olmaksızın içerisinde taş oluşan patent urakus olgusu bildirilmediği görülmüştür.
🔖
Cite This Article
DEMİRCAN, M., MUTUŞ, H. M., KARAMAN, A., ÇETİN, S. (2022). Patent urakus traktus'ta taş: Olgu sunumu. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 266–268. https://ajindex.com/articles/549553