Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Galaktozemili yenidoğan olgularımızın değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of our newborns with galactosemia

Pages
394–401
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides these clinical and laboratory findings, early diagnosis can be established by keeping in mind that galactosemia may present in infants having these findings

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to help clinicians in the recognition and follow-up of galactosemia by emphasizing that this disease may manifest with different clinical pictures in the neonatal period Materials and Methods: This retrospective uncontrolled study included 19 patients diagnosed with galactosemia and followed-up between January 1994 and January 2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Reductant agents in urine were evaluated using Benedict test, while galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) was measured with kinetic, enzymatic, colorimetric measurement method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides these clinical and laboratory findings, early diagnosis can be established by keeping in mind that galactosemia may present in infants having these findings
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to help clinicians in the recognition and follow-up of galactosemia by emphasizing that this disease may manifest with different clinical pictures in the neonatal period Materials and Methods: This retrospective uncontrolled study included 19 patients diagnosed with galactosemia and followed-up between January 1994 and January 2014. Five of them had been previously diagnosed. Reductant agents in urine were evaluated using Benedict test, while galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) was measured with kinetic, enzymatic, colorimetric measurement method. GALT mutation analysis was performed with the Tetraprimer Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction (ARMS-PCR) method. Galactose and free galactose were studied with the modified Diepenbrock colorimetric microassay method. Results: Eight (42.1%) of the patients were female and 11 (57.9%) male. Time of the suspicion for galactosemia was found as 11.5±6.3 days, while one patient (5.3%) had a familial history of galactosemia. The most common findings were nutritional intolerance (n=17, 89.5%), hypotonia (n=17, 89.5%) and organomegaly (n=15, 78.9%). The most commonly seen genetic disorder was GALT enzyme deficiency (n=12, 85.7%) and the most common mutation was the Q188R mutation (n=8, 66.6%). Conclusion: Galactosemia is a life threatening, but treatable disease with early diagnosis as well as being one of the metabolic diseases which cause confusion when clinically nonspecific findings are observed. Besides these clinical and laboratory findings, early diagnosis can be established by keeping in mind that galactosemia may present in infants having these findings

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, galaktozeminin yenidoğan döneminde farklı klinik tablolar ile ortaya çıkabileceğini vurgulayarak hastalığın tanınmasında ve izlenmesinde klinisyenlere yardımcı olmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamız retrospektif kontrolsüz olarak planlandı. Ocak 1994 ile Ocak 2014 tarihleri arasında galactosemia tanısı konularak takip edilmiş ondokuz hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bu hastaların beş tanesi eski tanısı konmuş hastalardı. İdrarda redüktan madde Benedict testiyle, galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) ölçümü kinetik, enzimatik kolorimetrik ölçüm metoduyla, GALT mutation analizi Tetra-primer Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polimeraze Chain Reaction (ARMS-PCR) metodu ile galaktoz ve serbest galaktoz ölçümleri modifiye Diepenbrock kolorimetrik mikroassay yöntemiyle çalışıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 8 (%42,1) kız 11 (%57,9) erkek idi. Galaktozemiden şüphelenme zamanı 11.5±6.3 gün ve ailede galaktozemi hikayesi 1 (%5,3) hastada vardı. En fazla tesbit edilen bulgular beslenme intoleransı (n=17, %89,5), hipotoni (n=17, %89,5), organomegali (n=15, %78,9) olarak dikkat çekti. En fazla görülen genetik bozukluk olarak GALT enzim eksikliği (n=12, %85,7) ve en fazla görülen mutasyon Q188R mutasyonu (n=8, %66,6) olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Galaktozemi hayatı tehdit eden ancak erken tanı ile tedavi edilebilen bir hastalık olamasının yanında, klinikte nonspesifik bulgular görüldüğünde tanısında kafa karışıklığına neden olabilen metabolik hastalıklardan biridir. Tüm bu klinik ve laboratuar bulgularının yanında, galaktozemi hastalığının bu bulguları taşıyan yenidoğanlarda akla getirilebilmesi de erken tanıyı sağlayabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, L., BASTUG, O., GUNES, T., AKİN, M. A., DAAR, G., ASCİOGLU, M. E., KARDAS, F., OZDEMİR, A., KURTOGLU, S., OZTURK, M. A., KORKUT, S., KENDİRCİ, M. (2022). Galaktozemili yenidoğan olgularımızın değerlendirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 394–401. https://ajindex.com/articles/549233

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bosch AM. Classical galactosaemia revisited. J Inherit Metab Dis 2006;29(4):516-25.
  2. Boonyawat B, Kamolsilp M, Phavichitr N. Galactosemia in Thai patient at Phramongkutklao Hospital: a case report. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88:275-80. Timmers I, van den Hurk J, Di Salle F, Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Jansma BM. Language production and working memory in classic galactosemia from a cognitive neuroscience perspective: future research directions. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34:367-76.
  3. Hughes J, Ryan S, Lambert D, Geoghegan O, Clark A, Rogers Y, et al. Outcomes of siblings with classical galactosemia. J Pediatr 2009;154(5):721-6.
  4. Holton JB, Walter JH, Tyfield LA. Galactosemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Vale D, eds. The Metabolic and Moleculer Bases of Inherited Disease, 8th ed. Vol. 1. The McGraw-Hill Companies 2001; p1562-74. Fridovich-Keil JL, Walter JH. Galactosemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Moleculer Bases of Inherited Disease. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division; 2008; p.72. Moyer V, Freese DK, Whitington PF, Olson AD, Brewer F, Colletti RB, et al. Guideline for the evaluation of cholestatic jaundice in infants: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 39(2):115-28. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Hyperbilirubinemia. Management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn infant 35 or more weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2004;114:297-316.
  5. Calderon FR, Phansalkar AR, Crockett DK, Miller M, Mao R. Mutation database for the galactose-1- phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) gene. Hum Mutat 2007;28(29):939-43.
  6. Holton JB, Walter JH, Tyfield LA. Galactosemia. In: Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, 8th ed, Scriver, CR, Beaudet, AL, Sly, WS, Valle, D (Eds), McGraw-Hill, New York 2001:1553. Farrag HM, Cowett RM. Hypoglycemia in the newborn. In: Lifshitz F (ed). Pediatric Endocrinology (5th ed). New York: Informa Healthcare, 2007:329-58.
  7. Murray KF, Kowdley KV. Neonatal hemochromatosis. Pediatrics 2001;108(4):960-4.
  8. Pearson L, Bissinger R, Romero KR. Neonatal hemochromatosis: a case report. Adv Neonatal Care 2009;9(2):72-6. Bosch AM. Classic galactosemia: dietary dilemmas. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34(2):257-60. Shin YS. Galactose metabolites and disorders of galactose metabolism. In: Hommes FA, ed. Techniques in diagnostic human biochemical genetics: a laboratory manual. New York: Wiley-Liss; 19